Ive seen sex educators like Reid About Sex and Sexplanations use megasexual to just mean what i described in my post. I think Reud possibly couned the term as well?

I'm open to it meaning something else. I personally identify with your description, i cant form romantic bonds without a strong sexual connection first.

TW:// message with suicidal encouragement, bigotry I went to bed to this message:

Wow, what a lovely and perfectly reasonable reply to that blog 🙄 Honestly why that blog for that message? I’ve posted cheesy memes but that blog is my heartfelt explanation about common misconceptions about supersexualities. I woke up to see someone had posted this:

Joking about killing off a sexuality just because you hate them and think they shouldn’t exist, is some bigoted shit. That shouldn’t need to be explained though. The tags of this post also reference genocide. For good measure because the post wasn’t hateful enough.

This is the user, block to avoid extreme superphobia:

Short answer: no.

1) Sexuality is inherently exclusive as a concept.

All humans have their own needs and perceptions that ultimately lead to a specific, fixed sexuality as well. Having a sexuality means they are attracted to something specific- and therefore do not experience that attraction or arousal by others outside that circle. Everyone reserves the right to sexual boundaries, and no one has the right to demand explanations for these boundaries.

2) Implications of calling a sexuality [ ]-phobic

If you believe that supersexuality is transphobic, you MUST also believe that homosexuality is misandrist and misogynistic. It is the continuation of the exact same logic and there are no two ways around it. As we know, this is a bigoted viewpoint as a person's sexuality is defined by who they LOVE, not who they don't.

3) Why calling supersexuals transphobes is deeply fascist and problematic

When you question the sexuality of others, implying their love has ulterior motives, this is a form of gaslighting, coercion and conversion therapy. However unintentional, it works to guilt others into dismantling their sexual boundaries for the benefit and sexual achievement of others. It is a demand which parallels fascist interrogation and homophobia. It is to assume that their sexuality is changeable, that it is simply a preference (a common misconception). Our orientation is NOT your sexual conquest. It is NOT your fetish.

iKokichi Ouma (DRv3) is Superphobic!