#superlesbian

'gold star lesbian' is just a different term for superlesbian

'gold star lesbian' is just a different term for superlesbian

'gold star lesbian' is just a different term for superlesbian

'gold star lesbian' is just a different term for superlesbian

'gold star lesbian' is just a different term for superlesbian

'gold star lesbian' is just a different term for superlesbian

'gold star lesbian' is just a different term for superlesbian

'gold star lesbian' is just a different term for superlesbian

'gold star lesbian' is just a different term for superlesbian

'gold star lesbian' is just a different term for superlesbian

Transphobia isn’t a sexuality

There is no such thing as the “LGBTQ+SS” community

We aren’t “superphobic”, you’re just a bigot

I don't agree with it under the principal of my dislike for MOGAI. I see "superstraight" or anything similar to be another MOGAI sexuality as it's a sexuality based on preferences beyond sexual preferences.

That said, I understand how it came to be and agree with it in a sense. People are using this to fight back against being told they must date trans people or they're transphobic. So, they fought back with the same tactic as the "enemy." That being, they created a sexuality just like MOGAIs do and used that to shield themselves from these people. It's the perfect trap and it's been years in the making. MOGAIs made the game, the rules, they set themselves up for this. To tear down superstraight (and it's sister sexualities) is to tear themselves down in the process. It's one of the reasons why they're so angry over this. They lost, their glass house is shattering every time they fight back. End of story.

Short answer: no.

1) Sexuality is inherently exclusive as a concept.

All humans have their own needs and perceptions that ultimately lead to a specific, fixed sexuality as well. Having a sexuality means they are attracted to something specific- and therefore do not experience that attraction or arousal by others outside that circle. Everyone reserves the right to sexual boundaries, and no one has the right to demand explanations for these boundaries.

2) Implications of calling a sexuality [ ]-phobic

If you believe that supersexuality is transphobic, you MUST also believe that homosexuality is misandrist and misogynistic. It is the continuation of the exact same logic and there are no two ways around it. As we know, this is a bigoted viewpoint as a person's sexuality is defined by who they LOVE, not who they don't.

3) Why calling supersexuals transphobes is deeply fascist and problematic

When you question the sexuality of others, implying their love has ulterior motives, this is a form of gaslighting, coercion and conversion therapy. However unintentional, it works to guilt others into dismantling their sexual boundaries for the benefit and sexual achievement of others. It is a demand which parallels fascist interrogation and homophobia. It is to assume that their sexuality is changeable, that it is simply a preference (a common misconception). Our orientation is NOT your sexual conquest. It is NOT your fetish.