"contradictory" labels that don't contradict any definitions, within exclus parameters.
(this doesn't mean I don't support contradictory labels that don't fit these! It's just pointing out hypocrisy from anti-contradictory labels folks)
Bi lesbian: if a lesbian is a woman or non-binary person that loves women and non-binary people, that usually means they like genders the same and different from their own. Bisexual doesn't automatically mean someone likes every gender, just at least one gender like and unlike your own. (This is still the same for the 2 gender definition)
Ex, a woman who is attracted to women and non-binary people falls under both bi and lesbian by definition.
This goes the same for bigays, mspec lesbians, and mspec gays
Lesboy & turigirl: not all women are non-men and not all men are non-women. Multigender and genderfluid people do not need to put themselves into one box to accurately label their sexuality.
Panlesbian & pangay: abrosexuals are cool and the split attraction model is not just for aspec attractions.
BiPan: see above + pansexuals fall under the definition of bisexual, many just choose to use 1 or the other. These people just use both.
Gaybian: a nblnb relationship fits both the definition criteria for gay and lesbian.
Again, these arent the only forms of these labels I support. I just want someone to stop for a second and ask themselves why they hate these. "That's not the definition!" Cannot be the answer. Stop bothering strangers because you don't personally understand their sexuality.
