This is one of those things that I only hear bits and pieces of, so it's quite possible I'm missing critical bits of information, but I find it endlessly amusing that Argentina's argument vis-a-vis why the Falkland Islands should be theirs boils down to the claim that the British are colonizing Indigenous Argentinian land, when Argentina itself is a country where most of the population are descendants of Spanish colonizers or (mostly European) immigrants to the country post-independence.
Stepping waaay out of my lane here as a non-Latino, but some people seem to be able to easily go "Oh, so the majority of people in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc. are descendants of British colonizers or immigrants granted permission to immigrate by the post-colony government, this is a settler colonial society" but don't understand that it's the same dynamic when the colonizing country is Spain. And taking one more step outside my lane, I suspect that part of the issue here is that a lot of people when picturing a "Latino" country are picturing somewhere like Mexico (where a lot of the population is made up of people who are a mixture of indigenous people and colonizers/immigrants), which gives undeserved cover to somewhere like Argentina (where a much bigger chunk of the population is made up of people of purely colonizer/immigrant stock)
