did you know that when i was 13 or 14 i photoshopped images of myself and a friend i had a crush on so that we both had her body and i printed them out and wrote "dont we look nice together?" and then sent them to her in the mail and after this we continued being friends and this didnt have much of an effect on our relationship?
i wish there were more of this kind of vulnerability in the universe
fear of being punished and regulated if they dont punish and regulate is in so many people
uncertainty over whether you yourself are a good person but a faux certainty that other people can determine whether you are a good person. and you know that they are locked in the same game you are so that if you press all the buttons right and act with propriety they have to validate you as a good person or be punished for not validating someone who is by local norms clearly Valid.
maybe it began with thinking they had new, *surprising*, information about whether you made the right choice. but after a bit You learn to predict regularities in their validation algorithm and how the game is played and can game it to get the other person to mouth the sounds "you did the right thing." and You make you forget that It is pulling levers in a social punishment mexican standoff in which It knows the other person is enmeshed.
and we have the thing where You might have started asking people for their opinions about what youve done because you want to do good and you can be wrong about doing good. it ends up with you remembering that people mouthing the words "you did the right thing." makes you feel nice inside and then You make yourself forget that You know that nodes going into "you did the right thing." are "will i be ostricized from my community? will people think im an okay human if i say these words?".
as a matter of efficiency, you start feeling very uncertain about whether you are a good person or making correct actions and outsource this by asking other people if you are valid. because thats less cognitively intensive and the answer is more certain than going through a process of checking over your actions to see if you are getting what you want with them.
this also has a side-effect of you doing what you really want less often because you are checking in with a relatively simple, able-to-be-modeled-by-you, deterministic algorithm rather than checking your brain to see if this is what you want. sometimes people like certainty and are averse to changing how things are so much that they wont ask themselves if they really want to do what they thought of because the answer might be "no".
its not even submission and deference to a human being, that might be scary and surprising and they might ask you to do something unexpected or uncomfortable. it actually takes bravery to transfer your life to an agentic Master. its scary and from what ive observed most humans actually arent up for that. its deference to the output of a rigged pachinko machine.
| a lot of this is from talking with emma
the world looks a lot more interesting when you arent seeding validation from a rigged pachinko machine stored in the brains of your friends. and you can try doing a priori unanticipated and complex things that you believe in.
people who are cucked by closing a loop of auto-validation can be counted on to do a lot of things. they are very reliable because they seed actions from sources that [people like them] can predict. but they have a hard time expressing the next thing in the sequence {bdsm, asmr, trans, plurality,...} even if they experienced it.
people who have strong internal compasses can be relied upon in a very different sense.