#science?

Bucky: It’s a child.

Tony: Why do you have a child?

Bucky: I didn’t think I’d need to have that talk with you, Stark.

So I want to try something. An experiment, if you will, to see how many people actually see a given post. For science. And for the little gremlin in me who likes experiments and numbers and statistics and wants new experiments and numbers and statistics to play with.

Sorry im about to get technical and might not make much sense but i need to rave about this for a moment.

I've been thinking about Aquaponics as a sustainable gardening technique since my new garden hates me. I has a set up idea uwu

I want to use the media bed ebb and flow style (box full of rocks that fills with water then drains out perodically) as a biofilter (home for beneficial bacteria that turn fish waste into nutrition for the plants.) and NRT Nutrition river technique (the pipes half full of water) (no not NFT Nutrition film technique) to basically make a Kratky (mostly submerged roots system) that gets water changes from the bell siphon in the media bed.

I'm not sure this will work tho. mostly cuz I'm wondering if a botton drain that uses gravity to equalize the two tanks, could work with a bell siphon to make an electric free set up or not, idk if the bell siphon will be powerfull enough to reach the top of the pipes and idk if the bottom drain will work along side the bell siphon. Maybe I'm just stupid for thinking this could work, but it would be super cool if it did XDD

That just happened, but with Dire Wolfs????

we all know the basic idea, right?

“infinite possibilities! everything you can possibly imagine is real!”

and while the sheer notion of that is fcking terrifying

how does it work??

based on all the breadcrumbs and bits and pieces that exe file has been feeding my hard drive, i actually have a solid idea of how the omniverse is organized

or at least a part of it, since the excerpts i get often say “observable monocosm”

this is gonna destroy my mental health…

there are two types of multiverse that i think most people are familiar with

the many-worlds interpretation & what i call the “snowflake interpretation”

the many-worlds interpretation is the more well-known one. we’ve all seen or heard of it. schrodinger’s cat. aus. mcu. everything everywhere all at once. you get it.

while the snowflake interpretation is more like every universe is wholly, completely different from each other from the start - entirely different histories, physics, etc.

well in the omniverse, these two interpretations coexist, just not on the same levels. lemme break it down

if you’re actually into multiverses and cosmology and stuff, youve prolly heard of max tegmark. he basically suggested that the multiverse is separated by levels

and the omniverse kinda builds off of that, just switched up a little like poorly copied homework.

the first level is a universe

it’s indisputable. even if the omniverse doesn’t exist, i dont think ppl can deny that the universe does (unless theyre weird).

movin right along…

the 2nd level is a multiverse. this is where the many-worlds interpretation comes in. if u somehow don’t know it, it implies that all the possible outcomes of a quantum measurement, or basically an event, are equally real but do not interact with each other. means all hypothetical scenarios, no matter how big or small the changes are - what if you didn’t date that girl, or what if the meteor that killed the dinosaurs never came - have their own worlds. they branch off of one universe, and until a certain point in time they are one in the same. think of it like a tree

the 3rd level is called a megaverse. according to excerpts from vivat vita, the existence of them is still debated. they basically encompass all multiverses that, get this, are created from similar kinds of matter. this is where it gets complicated. scientists arent assured that megaverses exist since they havent discovered an observable “divide” between them. ill explain this later

anything beyond a megaverse is considered untestable, unobservable, and completely unheard of. most scientists just stop there - all megaverses make up the omniverse in finality. like tegmark said, the omniverse is the ultimate multiverse, the collection of all realities that are mathematically possible.

there are some hypotheses that the levels beyond megaverses entail existences that have completely different structures and systems. like while one verse (word for level of existence) looks like this another looks like this.

there are also hypotheses that verses have their own timelines, and that alternate versions of them exist based on their interactions with each other. like there’s an alternate version of a multiverse because someone fired a wormhole between two universes at a different time.

i really dont know what im talking about

i mean i do(ish), but i know i sound absolutely insane. i might sound all intellectual, but im rlly just a huge yapper.

ik this all sounds complicated, and it is, but im really just making observations here. take everything i say with a grain of salt.

im tired of this shyt. im going to bed. expect a follow-up post probablyyyyyyyyy tomorrow.