Sam weighs in on the state of Magic Story and why the comparison to superhero comics isn't quite correct!...
Dominaria Key Art by Tyler Jacobson
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Philippines

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
Sam weighs in on the state of Magic Story and why the comparison to superhero comics isn't quite correct!...
Dominaria Key Art by Tyler Jacobson

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Who is Jace when all his memories are stripped away? Sam explores the meaning of
Castaway’s Despair by Chris Rahn
Take a peek behind the Black-mana veil over Diraden as Sam Keeper further explores Chandra's story!...
Chandra, Torch of Defiance by Magali Villeneuve
re: the AO3 house style, could you say more about "interiority without interiority"? I'm curious what that looks like
oh god okay, well, i am going to post mega cringe and we are all going to have to simply agree that ten years ago i was a fundamentally different person (what the fuck!!! ten years!!!). i also want to note that there are two different main strains of AO3 house style - the one evolved from chatty blogging style and the other is more evolved from the yesteryear of intellific. interiority without interiority in the latter tends to also show up in contemporary litfic.
its much simpler to do this with examples, but roughly i would say interiority without interiority has two forms. one is essentially where you have a passage that passes for introspection - it has all the signifiers of introspection - but the signifiers do not actually meaningfully connect to anything, and thus which renders the actual writing very thin. the second is i would say the result of a misapplication of show don't tell, where the author describes the bodily sensations of emotions and the fragmented consciousness of experiencing those emotions, but has not actually given us a key to unlock what the character is actually experiencing. now this can be a perfectly valid stylistic choice, but when it runs into the problem above - signs without signification - it can thin out the writing and make it weaker, than if you got into it a little bit. essentially, i think this boils down to a rookie writer problem, though there's an argument to be made more broadly for it plaguing litfic in general these days to create "character vapor".
illustrating this with examples under the cut:
I am sorry to say no actual song or dance was involved NOT EVEN GOOD JAZZ JUST LIKE THIRTY SECONDS OF JAZZ AT THE HEIGHT OF THE JAZZ AGE but hector fawley is absolutely the sort of posh twat who goes to the opera solely with the intent of fraternizing with his fellow purebloods and being able to go "ah yes the season" in his posh club with whiskey in one hand that he never drinks.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Rather, let's just think in terms of popular cultural signs--let's think semiotically and mythologically, in other words--about what it means for a woman to slide her whole hand into a man's wet, slimy hole. Mm yes we're talking about THAT scene. Like, ok, this is going to sound weirdly essentialist but there's a point to all of this, right? I'm talking here about the scene in the first film where Pepper helps Tony replace the power core in his chest, upgrading him essentially. And there's all sorts of signifiers here that are rather hard to assimilate in a traditionally defined semiotics of gender. Tony here is passive, powerless, totally vulnerable to his partner, who literally penetrates his body with her hand, all while he encourages her. The inside of Tony Stark is slimy and strange, a Cronenbergian pit that, as you watch the sequence, seems to extend far beyond what is probably biologically possible. It is a deep hole, fearsome and alien. We are witnessing the alpha male Tony Stark transformed into a vulnerable but also disturbingly alien entity. See what I mean about this being somewhat essentializing? Like, there's no way around it--there's a weird psychosexual dimension to this that draws upon traditional conceptions of male and female sex roles. But these signifiers here function much the same way that they do in some extreme queer art--as a disruptive and deconstructive force applied to an unfamiliar body in ways that confound and disturb the boundaries of traditional binaries. The vulnerability of Tony Stark stems here from a confusion of Man and Machine. Tony's process of cyberization parallels his development into a strangely fluid subject, vulnerable, hysterical, clinging to the symbols of masculinity while he is bodily transformed into an entity that, in its cyborg dependence upon those surrounding him, mirrors traditional conceptions of femininity. He is totally at the mercy of Pepper Potts, and the moments when she causes him pain (through touching the wires to the side of the casement for his cybernetic heart) that flipped power dynamic, with the woman wielding the instruments of painful penetration over the male subject, is emphasized. But all the while he asserts the masculine rationality of the scientist, asserting that the state of his own body is acceptable, expected, within anticipated parameters. So, there is a strange interplay here of signs.
Sam Keeper, “Tony Stark in the Integrated Circuit: The Iron Man films and Cyborg Feminism” (Storming the Ivory Tower)
One of the absolute best moments in the film, one of the moments where I found myself totally engaged, was when Blake/Robin found himself in a fight with two workmen who, it turned out, had been pouring dynamite-laced concrete all across the city. (This is another thing to add to the list of Intriguing Ideas Never Explored Fully--after all, you would have to have a pretty big construction company under your thumb to enable that kind of infiltration, no? Again we see the looming spectre of corporate-sponsored terrorism.) Robin shoots both of his assailants and then, realizing that he's about to lose his one lead, desperately questions the dying cement truck driver. Realizing that he has failed, he glances down at his gun and, with a look of disgust, tosses it aside. Wow. And there, ladies and gentlemen, you have one key aspect of the Batman mythos encapsulated in a single scene. It's a wonderful moment that marks a profound transformation of one character's understanding of combat, and his relationship to the legendary power of a man who rules not by fire power but by fear power. This is, of course, totally tossed out the window when Bane gets an artillery blast to the chest courtesy of Catwoman.
Mako's character development is actually almost entirely visual in nature--no one talks through her memories or explains her motivations aloud. What's more, her personality and character arc is defined strongly by color symbolism. So, while she doesn't have a huge number of lines, that doesn't make her shallow.