#riproarrude

“ but beware anyone that makes serious accusations with no proof behind it.”

This coming from the guy who called me a pedo because I know what “age of consent” means and I don’t want America butting in where they are not wanted (https://riproarrude.tumblr.com/post/164821593224/just-in-case-anyone-thought-i-was-lying-about-that#_=_)

Just in case anyone thought I was lying about that pedophile apologist thing… Apparently I was and he’s just a straight up pedo, soooo

... Ah yes, me being a pedo...when I say that having sex with someone when it is LEGAL to have sex with them and having nuance about the idea is pedophilic, which is why I advocate for the harshest penalties for pedophiles as possible and did not feel anything outside of sadistic glee when I heard that Pedophiles get targeted in prison: one of the few times I am happy aboutr the prison system in America. In all honesty, my advocating for no death penalties is rather hard for me to keep up with Pedophiles.

But go right ahead and keep accusing me even as my words contradict what you say: That’ll surely convince people. 

this is disgusting. im epescially disgusted by “if the person is of the age of consent, they are not a child anymore”. in some places, the age of consent is as low as 12 or 13. is a 12 year old not a child?

on top of that, even tho the “average” age of consent is 16 (im assuming that skews low), that is for cases between two people around the same age. there are still laws against a 16 year old and someone 19+.

kob’s instance of the difference between pedophilia and ephebophilia, never mind that ‘pedophilia’ is used as a catchall and the fact that a “ephebophile” is just as predatory and disgusting as a pedophile, is creepy at best and dangerous at worst.

unfortunately, this is just another thing in the long list of disgusting things kob defends

In our eyes, they are. In their countries eyes; no. If the people of that country find it to be a problem: Then we can step in. But ONLY then, otherwise we just look like self frighteous assholes. Oh wait, I’m talking about RWDE...

And then there are cases that cover that age gap, known as Romeo and Juilet Laws (http://sex-crimes.laws.com/statutory-rape/romeo-and-Juliet). The only problem I have with these laws is that they discriminate against homosexual relationships. I honestly cannot tell the difference between a 19 year old male and a 16 year old female (or vice verse with a 19 year old female and a 16 year old male) and one in which both sides have the same gentials besides something as stupid as the contents of their pants.

Yes, dangerous...that si why we have laws that allow it and that is why we have an age of consent that is 16 in our country and in most of the world. Because you, an idiot who can’t understand the difference between a homophobe and someone who disagrees with you, would know more than the greatest minds in our country spanning for over 200 years.

But let’s talk about that line there (Never mind that pedophila is used as a catchall-): Wanna know what else is used as a catchall? Nazis for conservates. Yeah, people have used the term “Nazi” to mean “conservative” or “Right winged”. And you wanna know happened when people did that? Actual Neo-Nazies started coming out of the wood work and speaking up. This also falls under the same term as “homophobe” being used to mean “person who doesn’t care about sexuality” which gave rise to actual homophobes. Yeah, whenever people start using a term for the extreme as a “catchall” for everything in that vincity: it does NOTHING but normalize the term. The term becomes commonplace, it loses it’s impact and the people who DO fall under the term don’t feel as ostrasized and outcast  as they should be. Like how Pedophiles nowadays are so confident when you use “Pedophile” like a Touhou Boss uses bullets, they are trying to get labeled the same as LGBT people. Yeah this is an actual thing (http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/is-the-lgbt-about-to-add-pedophilia-as-another-protected-sexual-orientation/)

I’ve already seen this happen for Nazies and Homophobes: I DON’T want this to happen to pedophiles. They need to demonized as much as possible and we CANNOT let tehm think their way of acting is in anyway normal! When I use the term “Ehebophile”, what I mean is “Someone should check that out and make sure something isn’t going on.” When I use “Pedophile”, I mean “”GET THE FUCK AWAY FROM ME< YOU SICK SON OF A BITCH BEFORE I INDULGE MY SADISM ON YOU!” I use the terms to make it clear actual Pedophiles are NOT WELCOME: That they are ENTIRELY DIFFERENT than a dubious relationship.

WHile you just make them feel at home for calling a 19 year old guy going out with a 16 year old on their 2 year anniversary while they fuck some poor helpless 10 year old Whole being a whole two decades older than them. Yeah,  know that’s not what you mean but that’s you’re doing.

... I am going to try to be calm and rational about this...

But let me make this clear: Going after me is one thing. I can laugh and brush that off. I’ve got a thick skin from all this. But going after my friends? Yeah...

I can’t really control myself after shit like this.

*face grows dark*

Before I begin on what REALLY bothers me about this, how about I explain a few things to you:

1. If that ephepopholla is only used by pedos and pedo apologists, why is there definitions of the word all over the fucking place (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ephebophile / http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Ephebophile / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia)

2. Teh word exists for a fucking reason: PEDOPHILIA is seen as universally wrong as all countries to not allow for the act of sexual intercourse with prepubescent children. EDHEBOPHILIA on the other hand varies from country to country, from some areas like Iowa and Missouri allowing sex at the age 16, Texas banning it until the age of 17 and California at the age of 18 whereas most of South America allows it at the age of 14, most of Europe allows it at the age of 14-15, Most of Asia has the limit at 15 while Japan has it at 14 legally while meany prefectures vary from 13-18, And the ONE area that would have EDHEPOHILLA illegal is one mass of islands far north of Japan. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#Law) Meaning that in most inst5ances, including our own fucking country, EDHEBOPHILLA is mostly legal.

You can argue the morality all you want. Personally, if the teen is beyond the age of consent but not a legal adult (18 or 21 depending on your definition), I personally believe it is up to the family themselves to judge whether or not the child should have a relationship with an adult (as they are the ones who know the people in question, not me.) By the LAW is the LAW and most of the time so when I hear someone calling PEDOPHILIA who is having sex with someone who isn’t PREPUBSCENT, I assume that the6y are trying to make everyone conform to their beliefs and ignore the inherent complexities of people and the situation. Whether or not it is harmful is up to the justice system, the people involved, the familys of both sides and teh community. Anyone else should shut their mouths because it’s not their business neither do they have all the facts.

But that’s not what I am concerned about here.

@ruprroarude

What is THAT in your tags?

guess what Jobe? the only people that actually make that distinction are pedophiles and pedophile apologists

Jobe

Where the HELL did you get that name?

I never TOLD you that name. I have told TWO people that name over the internet and I damn know that THEY wouldn’t say my real name.

I honestly find really think any of the characters have that much to duo with their inspirations, aside from Neon, who’s an annoying rainbow cat

ruby and blake are surprisingly tied to their stories, and I’m going to hand it to monty for this one. red riding hood is obvious with the red hood, beowolves, female relative dying thanks to said monsters but rrh is often seen as an aesop about young women losing their innocence and being punished for how naieve they are. a big part of ruby as a character is her childlike innocence getting in her way and clouding her view, even though shes opted to walk a dangerous path. the entire thing about huntsmen also ties heavily into rrh too.

blake obviously has her whole beauty and the beast thing as both in relation to her view of herself as a faunus and in regards to her relationship with adam. you can take it a step further and say the violent terrorist aspect of blake can also be seen as her “beast” side. she also likes reading. the beast in the story flies into a rage when beauty’s father tries to take something precious to him (a rose in story, potentially blake in series). theres also adam’s association with wilting flowers but im sure mkg arent going to do anything with that one

weiss and yang are a little weaker bc theyre the worst written but. yang has her encounter with the three bears, and in some variations a literal hunter is who saves her from the bears. i have a feeling yang losing her arm, if monty planned it, was to mimic goldilocks being punished for her hubris and being chased by said bears but the Writers and bad at their jobs.

weiss comes from a royal-esque family, with the parent who married into the family being literally evil. jacques, much like the wicked queen, shows frustration and anger over the fact weiss displays schnee family traits that he cant even hope to achieve. the queen uses multiple attempts to try and kill snow, which could be linked to jacques long lasting and ultimately futile attempts to abuse and control her, and she also has her dwarves i nthe vein of klein. i wouldnt be surprised if jacques sends out a new antagonist to drag her back ala the huntsman but we’ll have to see. snow white is also the only girl here with a traditional prince which may explain her multiple instant and awful love interests.

replied to your

post

:

‘i want an m/m ship in one of the very few f/f...

Anti bb shippers are insane, truly