When someone has a poll with a “results: OP only” button, do you press it?
yes
no
results: OP only
seen from Morocco

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Mexico
seen from Mexico
seen from Philippines

seen from Italy
seen from Austria
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Brazil
seen from Germany

seen from Oman

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Mexico

seen from Georgia

seen from United States
When someone has a poll with a “results: OP only” button, do you press it?
yes
no
results: OP only

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I recently bemoaned the insistence that every poll have a "no results" button, because I maintain that sometimes things just aren't for you, and if you’re mature enough to be on this website, you're mature enough to know that. And I was directed to a poll where people were asked what they do when they come across a poll without a "see results" button that doesn't apply to them, and roughly 16% of respondents (it was 20% at the time, but had dropped by the time the poll closed) said they choose a random option. And the argument being presented by the person who directed me to it was that this is why we need to include that button.
But I would argue that "I feel entitled to access to discussions that do not involve me, and am willing to skew results in order to do so" is a bad stance to take, actually, and I should not be told I need to pander to it. Piss off.
"But the math is easy to do to find the right answer!" I don't care. It isn't about the difficulty of the math, it's about the audacity.
"But you have to account for the possibility of random result clickers!" That's covered within a margin of error. We've had systems for that for a very long time.
"But I like pushing buttons!" Go play a game, then.