#researchworkflow

Treating literature as static content can lead to outdated insights and weaker decisions. In pharmacovigilance and research workflows, static evidence quickly becomes irrelevant as new data emerges.

When insights are not continuously updated, important signals can be missed, limiting the ability to respond effectively. This lack of current context results in decisions that do not reflect the latest evidence.

Repeated literature screening is a growing challenge in pharmacovigilance and scientific workflows. The hidden cost of re-screening the same literature is not just time-it impacts decision quality, efficiency, and team productivity.

Duplicate effort occurs when the same articles are reviewed multiple times across teams, leading to unnecessary repetition. This creates a time drain, where manual re-screening slows down critical safety and research decisions.

Over time, lost context becomes a major issue, as past decisions are not reused or connected to new evaluations. Combined with inefficient workflows driven by fragmented systems, this results in inconsistent outputs and reduced operational efficiency.