The weird digression on my last post into whether plural systems are inherently alterhuman or not made me completely forget that there are plurals for whom their plurality is alterhuman because it forms a gestalt identity (ex. a plural system collectively identifying as dogs not on an individual level, but on a metaphysical and/or physical one) or because they're a median system and their facets happen to be separate people but also past lives or kintypes. Like, I knew it in the back of my mind (hence why I even made the post) but I forgot to include it in the conversation.
Which I guess, is another way how median systems and collectivist/gestalt systems keep on getting sidelined out of the community, because people can't imagine being two or more things at the same time.
