The Living Quantum
Besides the universe teeming with life, with no extra dimensions, and we are not living in a simulation, there are other logical outcomes from the expanding universe motion that creates our movements and this chain of causes and effects.
In the quantum world, entanglement is a challenge to understand. In the expanding universe motion, since the photon is moving at the same speed of the expanding universe motion, when it is split and becomes in an entangled state, the two halves are still on the same frame. There is no distance on the frame, but to us, there appears to be a distance from the number of frames between us and the entangled pair. In essence, from our point of view, we see the entangled particles separated in distances from each other and in theory, they can even be light years apart, a spooky action at a distance. But in fact, they are on the same frame as they are moving together at the same speed and going through the same number of frames.
In the two-slit experiment, again the expanding universe motion explains this and it is not in a particle-wave dual quantum state, but only a wave or field state. When the wave hits the screen, the high energy localises into one spot. So, in the double-slit experiment, unlike the single-slit experiment, the two-slit apparatus interact with the photon, electron, buckyball wave-field, that causes the wave to travel at different lengths due to change of angles and projectory from the spot of interaction at the double-slit apparatus creating a longer path and the wave lands at different places on the screen.
When the photon, electron, or buckyball is shot out, each take a slightly different path, off centre from each other, towards the two-slit apparatus. Then, when the photon, electron, and buckyball wave hits the two-slit apparatus, each wave hits it at a different location that separates the wave and forces the wave to go through one slit, not two. Because of the different projectory path from this two-slit apparatus to the screen is different for each wave, each then goes through a different number of frames. If we know where each wave hits the two-slit apparatus, we can predict where the wave will hit the screen. Hence, there is no probability and no mysterious cause for the superposition collapsing. There is no measurement problem, as well.
But, to us, they are all appearing to be hitting the same screen. Perhaps we can measure the difference in time it takes for each photon, electron, and buckyball to reach the screen. Be a difference at the Planck scale between each frame.
To us, it appears to be hitting the same screen, but to the photon, electron, and buckyball, each are hitting a different screen, due to the difference in time and increase in length due to the change of angle and projectory from the point of interaction at the double-slit apparatus causing a longer path. Our observation and our consciousness does not collapse the wave function.
This also rules out Hugh Everett’s many world interpretation (MWI) that the world branches off into two worlds when a quantum choice is made. The many world interpretation has an infinite number of worlds and multiverses. In the living universe expansion, there is still the one world, our world. The quantum world is going through different number of frames and to us, they are all on the same frame. But to each quantum, even though going at the same speed, but on a slightly different projectory from each other and thus, are travelling through a different number of frames.
From our point of view, we see the electron hitting the same screen and we use probabilities to explain the results, and that it is a wave probability function which interferes with itself. This becomes a mathematical probability function concept and the wave only exists in reality before reaching the two-slit apparatus and when it hits the screen. Does not exist in between until the wave mysteriously collapses. From the expanding universe motion, the wave exists and is real all the time: from the apparatus, hitting the slits, and travelling towards the screen.
This expanding universe motion could also challenge the age of the universe and the inflationary period. Scientists do not observe galaxies 50 billion years old, only the galaxies, from our point of view, appear to be 50 billion light years away from us. If speed is different for each galaxy, then each galaxy would be travelling through different number of frames. To us, all the galaxies would appear to be all on the same frame, but to each galaxy, each would be on different frames.
The expanding universe motion can also explain the reason for the two different values of the Hubble Constant that are about 9% apart from each other, a larger difference than the range of measurement error. The galaxies are going through a different number of frames from each other.
