what if our two distinct 4-dimensional perduring selves shared a sole temporal part and we were both girls <3
seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Italy
seen from Mexico

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from China
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Thailand

seen from Poland
seen from China

seen from Singapore
what if our two distinct 4-dimensional perduring selves shared a sole temporal part and we were both girls <3

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Patru-dimensionalismul în filosofie
În filozofie, patru-dimensionalismul (cunoscut și ca doctrina părților temporale) este poziția ontologică conform căreia persistența unui obiect în timp este ca și extinderea sa prin spațiu. Astfel, un obiect care există în timp are părți temporale în diferitele subregiuni ale regiunii totale de timp pe care o ocupă, la fel cum un obiect care există într-o regiune a spațiului are cel puțin o…
See also: endurantism
I had written something that seemed of importance. It is gone now.
Time is but an illusion. I sense now what I had felt before my prudence; it is gone now.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
~300 more words left to go..
"Perdurantism or perdurance theory is a philosophical theory of persistence and identity. The perdurantist view is that an individual has distinct temporal parts throughout its existence. (As opposed to endurantism, which is the view that an individual is wholly present at every moment of its existence). The use of "endure" and "perdure" to distinguish two ways in which an object can be thought to persist can be traced to David Kellogg Lewis (1986). However, contemporary debate has demonstrated the difficulties in defining perdurantism (and also endurantism). For instance, the work of Ted Sider (2001) has suggested that even enduring objects can have temporal parts, and it is more accurate to define perdurantism as being the claim that objects have a temporal part at every instant that they exist. However, as Stuchlik (2003) states, the stage theory won't work under the possibility of gunky time, which states that for every interval of time, there is a sub-interval, and according to Zimmerman (1996), there have been many self-professed perdurantists who believe that time is gunky or contains no instants. Some perdurantists think this means there are no instants, since they define these as intervals of time with no subintervals. Currently there is no universally acknowledged definition of perdurantism."
Perdurantism
Perdurantism or perdurance theory is a philosophical theory of persistence and identity.[1] The perdurantist view is that an individual has distinct temporal parts throughout its existence. (As opposed to endurantism, which is the view that an individual is wholly present at every moment of its existence).[1] The use of "endure" and "perdure" to distinguish two ways in which an object can be thought to persist can be traced to David Kellogg Lewis (1986). However, contemporary debate has demonstrated the difficulties in defining perdurantism (and also endurantism). For instance, the work of Ted Sider (2001) has suggested that even enduring objects can have temporal parts, and it is more accurate to define perdurantism as being the claim that objects have a temporal part at every instant that they exist. Zimmerman (1996) has said that this won't work, as there have been many self-professed perdurantists who believe that time is 'gunky' and that for every interval of time, there is a sub-interval. Some perdurantists think this means there are no instants, since they define these as intervals of time with no subintervals. Currently there is no universally acknowledged definition of perdurantism (see also McKinnon (2002) and Merricks (1999)).