#paperpack

Conan the Warrior by Robert E. Howard, ed. by L. Sprague de Camp

1977 Ace reprint of the original 1967 Lancer edition, my own copy.

Open collab I joined on insta for @/prmths.c 80k followers! Check their account, everything is so nice!!

LoL, the Paperpack is said to beat the Star Sanses and be a potential rival to the Nightmare Gang XDDD

Undertale (c) TobyFox PaperJam (c) @7goodangel Papercut (c) Me

depicted entity Dysfunktionale Liebe Tod der Liebe

What Compressive Strength (ECT Or BCT Value) Should Be Achieved When Corrugated Cardboard Boxes Are Stacked?

Determining the Required Compressive Strength for Stacked Corrugated Boxes

When corrugated cardboard boxes are stacked, their ability to withstand vertical loads is often measured by Edge Crush Test (ECT) or Box Compression Test (BCT) values. For practical packaging applications, selecting the appropriate ECT or BCT value depends heavily on the stacking height, box dimensions, and product weight. For instance, a 32 ECT board typically supports up to 65 lbs in stacking weight, suitable for light consumer goods, whereas industrial shipments with heavier contents may require boards rated at 44 ECT or higher.

In a warehouse scenario where pallets of electronics are stacked four units high, using boxes with an insufficient ECT value often results in crushing damage at the lower layers. Based on industry standards like those from FEFCO and ASTM D642, a BCT value of around 350 lbs is recommended for boxes expected to endure multi-tier stacking over extended periods, ensuring structural integrity during transit and storage.

Factors Influencing ECT and BCT Requirements in Packaging Design

Box dimensions and product density directly impact the necessary compressive strength. A taller box with a larger surface area will distribute load differently than a smaller, more compact package, often necessitating higher ECT ratings such as 48 or even 51 ECT grades commonly supplied by brands like Baitapackaging. Additionally, moisture content and paperboard flute profile—whether B-flute for cushioning or C-flute for stacking strength—affect the actual performance under compression.

Moreover, the type of corrugated board liner and medium, such as kraft versus recycled fibers, can significantly alter the box’s resilience. In export scenarios, where containers are subjected to variable humidity and rough handling, opting for double-wall constructions with combined ECT values exceeding 60 lbs/in is prudent. In fact, BCT calculations incorporating these parameters provide a more reliable prediction of box performance than ECT alone.

Practical Guidelines and Industry Benchmarks for Stacking Strength

Experience within the packaging sector suggests that for retail distribution, a minimum ECT of 32 and a corresponding BCT near 250 lbs suffice for products weighing less than 20 kg per box. However, logistics companies handling heavy machinery components often specify a BCT exceeding 500 lbs, supported by triple-wall corrugated boards. These specifications ensure compliance with global shipping requirements and minimize product loss due to box failure.

To illustrate, a client in automotive parts export recently transitioned from standard 33 ECT cartons to 44 ECT models supplied by Baitapackaging, resulting in a 30% reduction in damaged goods during pallet stacking and shipment. This case underscores the importance of aligning compressive strength values not only with static load expectations but also with dynamic handling conditions often overlooked in basic packaging design.