Lore Map Update!
First off, big thanks to @white-hole-station who helped out a ton with these new lore cards! They decided to share their work on documenting and analyzing Hearthian dialogue, and this shall save me a lot of precious time :D
I will try to regularly post updates like these if you don't mind! One purpose is to remind people that the Outer Wilds Lore Map exists, sure, but most importantly, it's so that you guys can give criticism on what's being put in it. Do you disagree with the conclusions or the wording? Are the tags wrong? Do you see a typo? Tell me all about it so it can be fixed!
A couple lore cards in this bunch seem to me like there is definitely more to explore here, and that some debate may be in order (because there already has been some debate while writing them already!). So if you have more evidence about this or that, please comment here so we can have a proper conversation!
Without further ado, here is the list of today's new additions:
And the save point that will let you open them and view their full contents all by yourselves:
{"Pins":["MarlTreeKeeper","MarlBigTree","RutileMarlGrudge","MoraineMarlGrudge","EskerMarlFriends","EskerMarlGrudge"],"DLC":"Show"}
(grah I hope Tumblr won't be dumb about copy/pasting these. I do not want to have to figure out a URL-based system for save points PLEASE)
.
A few screenshots:
PS: Let me know if you'd like me to make posts like these also for lore cards that are already present on the web page, so that you can give them the same kind of scrutiny and criticism! Alternatively if you see something you'd like to talk about, you can totally @ me or DM me (though it'd be best if multiple people could join the conversation and give their opinion --- that's what the Discord server is for! Purely lore talk to debate what is or isn't appropriate to put on the Lore Map).
I've already seen one post taking a screenshot of a specific lore card -- you can do that and @ me in it if you have some criticism about it, that way it's public and anyone can take part in the debate!
Since this is an alternate kind of wiki, this means that agreeing with what you see there is crucial. Agreeing with only 99% of it is not good enough if the 1% of disagreement you hold is factually true.
.
.
.
And now for some fun bonus ramblings strictly meant for speculation/headcanon territory and the funsies:
