#objecthood

Tablet 01 & Tablet 02

tin, rust, pigment, plaster

Is The Book A Book?

What Immanuel Kant is pointing to is something very real. Your senses do not give you ready-made objects. They give you changing signals, light, color, sound, pressure, all unfolding in time and space. From that shifting input, your mind groups, stabilizes, and says this is a “thing” that continues. That is why you experience a book, a ball, a person, instead of a chaotic stream. Objects as you experience them are constructed. The continuity you feel, the “same thing over time,” depends on how your mind organizes what comes in. Without that, the world would not appear as stable objects at all.

But the claim says that objects “don’t necessarily exist as objects,” as if they were purely invented. That goes too far. There is a reason your mind can successfully group signals into a book or a ball. The world has regularities, stable patterns, structures that persist and interact. If there were no such structure outside you, your mind could not reliably track anything. You would not survive, and your perceptions would not match up with action. The world provides structured input. Your mind organizes that input into objects.

Neither side alone is enough. If you only had raw input with no organizing, there would be no objects. If you only had organizing with no real structure outside, it would not work consistently. Arthur Schopenhauer emphasizes the first side, that the world as you experience it is representation. You are always dealing with a constructed version. But even he does not mean that there is nothing behind it. He means that what you call an “object” is already shaped by your way of seeing. Objecthood and continuity are not simply given, they are achieved by your mind.

Rev-->Table Digital DNA