#nursingquestions

PHI 413 Topic 2 God, Humanity, And Human Dignity Topic 2: God, Humanity, And Human Dignity

“Do you need assistance in this paper or any other? Chat Us Live!‎ https://mynursingessaypapers.com/2022/07/06/phi-413-topic-2-…nd-human-dignity/ ‎”

Objectives:

1. Explain the Christian view of the nature of human persons. 2. Compare the Christian view of intrinsic human value and dignity in contrast to secular views of personhood. 3. Evaluate how the concept of intrinsic human dignity is applied in the process of ethical decision-making.

Assessments

Topic 2 DQ 1 (275 WORDS, 3 REFERENCES) What is the Christian concept of the imago Dei? How might it be important to health care, and why is it relevant? Topic 2 DQ 2 (275WORDS, 3 REFERENCES)

According to your worldview, what value does a human person have? How does your position affect your stance on controversial bioethical issues, such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research?

Assignment: Case Study on Moral Status (3 pages, 5 references) SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT

Assessment Description Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and the required topic Resources, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

1. What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to intrinsic human value and dignity?

2. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?

3. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?

4. What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?‎

 ORDER HERE: https://mynursingessaypapers.com/2022/07/06/phi-413-topic-2-…nd-human-dignity/ ‎ 

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Buy A Plagiarism-Free Paper Here:⇓

PHI-413V-RS-T3T5 Case Study Healing And Autonomy.

“Let us handle this question instantly for you!

In addition to the topic study materials, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about \”Case Study: Healing and Autonomy\” as the basis for your responses in this assignment.

Answer the following questions about a patient\’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.

In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient\’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.

In 400-500 words, respond to the following:

 How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention?

 What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James\’s care?

In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?

Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.

https://mynursingessaypapers.com/

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN ) 5.2

Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.

Attachments PHI-413V-RS-T3T5CaseStudyHealingAndAutonomy.docx RUBRIC Attempt Start Date: 13-Sep-2021 at 12:00:00 AM

Due Date: 19-Sep-2021 at 11:59:59 PM Maximum Points: 200.0

ORDER AN A++PAPER HERE!

https://mynursingessaypapers.com/2022/07/21/phi-413v-rs-t3t5-case-study-healing-and-autonomy/

Week Nine Assignment : Self-Assessment of Leadership Skills

Week Nine Assignment Detailed Instructions

Assignment: Leadership Assessment

What personal strengths do you have that would make you an effective nurse leader? What potential gaps might you need to address to improve your ability to be an effective nurse leader?

As a future DNP-prepared nurse, you will be called upon as a leader in your field, a leader in your practice, and a leader in your organization. Throughout your program of study, you will develop the skills, strategies, and knowledge to not only harness this role successfully but to do so at a high level of achievement and performance.

Photo Credit: [Squaredpixels]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

However, everyone must acknowledge both their own strengths and weaknesses, as a leader, and identify potential areas of improve to enhance these capabilities.

Assignment: (5) pages

To Prepare:

Review the nurse leadership competencies presented in the Learning Resources for this week.

Reflect on these competencies, and consider your strengths and potential gaps in relation to these competencies.

Consider potential goals for your leadership development in relation to the nurse leadership competencies presented.

Order A plagiarism-free paper here

The Assignment: (4–5 pages)

Explain your self-assessment in relation to the nurse leadership competencies. Be sure to identify your strengths and potential gaps in relation to these competencies.

Describe at least four goals for nurse leadership development that you would like to pursue, given the results of your self-assessment. Be specific.

Explain why these goals are pertinent to your development as a nurse leader. How will developing these leadership competencies support your healthcare organization or nursing practice? Be specific.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

Grading Rubric:

javascript:ActivateLink('WK09.AS1.RUBRIC',true)

Learning Resources to use for references provided by instructor and school. Please use it first; if you need to go outside, it's ok.

https://www.ache.org/about-ache/our-story/our-commitments/policy-statements/healthcare-executives-role-in-ensuring-quality-and-safety

https://www.aonl.org/resources/nurse-leader-competencies

https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/training-leaders-culture-quality-safety/docview/2202726368/se-2?accountid=14872

http://www.healthcareleadershipalliance.org/

https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/designing-pilot-testing-leadership-intervention/docview/2241967041/se-2?accountid=14872

https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/deprecated-unorganized/imported-assets/tjc/system-folders/topics-library/sea_57_safety_culture_leadership_0317pdf.pdf?db=web&hash=10CEAE0FD05B6C3A4A1F040F7B69

MSN-FP6016 Capella University Adverse Event in Healthcare

MSN-FP6016 Capella University Adverse Event in Healthcare

Write a comprehensive analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or near miss from your nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative to your current organization.

Introduction Health care organizations strive to create a culture of safety. Despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to be made. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Many errors are attributable to ineffective interprofessional communication.

This assessment’s goal is to address a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities with a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents. https://mynursingessaypapers.com/2022/06/08/225 Instructions For this assessment, you will prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss that you or a peer experienced during your professional nursing career. You will integrate research and data on the event and use this information as the basis for a quality improvement (QI) initiative proposal in your current organization.           The following points correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. The subbullets under each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your adverse event or near-miss analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels relating to each grading criterion.

Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss. Describe how the event resulted from a patient’s medical management rather than from the underlying condition. Identify and evaluate the missed steps or protocol deviations leading to the event. Explain the extent to which the incident was preventable. Research the impact of the same type of adverse event or near miss in other facilities. Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders. Evaluate the short- and long-term effects on the stakeholders (patient, family, interprofessional team, facility, community). Analyze each stakeholder’s contribution to the event. Analyze the interprofessional team’s responsibilities and actions. Explain what measures each interprofessional team member should have taken to create a culture of safety. Describe any change to process or protocol implemented after the incident. Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. Analyze the quality improvement technologies put in place to increase patient safety and prevent recurrence of the near miss or adverse event. Determine the appropriateness of the technology application for a specific patient or situation. Research scholarly, evidence-based literature to learn how institutions can integrate solutions to prevent similar events. Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near-miss incident to support need for improvement. Identify the salient data associated with the adverse event or near miss that is generated from the facility’s dashboard. Note: Dashboard means data generated from the information technology platform that provides integrated operational, financial, clinical, and patient safety data for health care management. Analyze what the relevant metrics show. Explain research or data related to the adverse event or near miss that is available outside of your institution. Compare internal data to external data. Use resources such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), and the World Health Organization (WHO). Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent the recurrence of an adverse event or near miss. Explain, from an evidence-based viewpoint, how your facility now manages or should manage the process or protocol. Evaluate how other institutions addressed similar incidents or events. Analyze QI initiatives developed to prevent similar incidents. Explain why they are successful. Provide evidence of their success. Propose solutions for your selected institution that can be implemented to prevent similar future adverse events or near-miss incidents. Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Example Assessment: You may use the Adverse Event or Near-Miss Analysis Exemplar [PDF] for an idea of what an assessment receiving a proficient or higher evaluation would look like. & https://mynursingessaypapers.com/2022/06/08/225 Additional Requirements Submission length: 5-7 typed, double-spaced pages. Font: Times New Roman, 12 point. Number of references: Cite a minimum of five current scholarly and/or authoritative sources to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Current literature is defined as no older than 5 years unless it is a seminal work. APA formatting: Citations and references must adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines. Consult these resources for an APA refresher: Evidence and APA. APA Module. American Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA style. https://www.apastyle.org/ Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses. Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss. Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders. Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. Outline an evidence-based quality improvement initiative to prevent an adverse event or near miss. Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures. Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near-miss incident to support need for improvement. Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Order An Oiginal Copy Of MSN-FP6016 Capella University Adverse Event in Healthcare Here