#nospecwork

These things get complicated, so let’s break it down to 2 categories:

1) Doing work on a project until a client knows they want to go with your direction. Many “art contests” fall under this category too. This is bullshit. It’s called “working on spec” and feel free to forward them this website: https://www.nospec.com

2) Doing work on a fictional project that definitely is not going to be used by the company in order to show your ability. This is called an “Art Test” and is frequently used in many industries — but for long-term projects or staff jobs, not for single project freelance. For that, a client should be able to tell from your portfolio how you will work and to what quality. That’s what a portfolio is for. If they’re asking you to do as much work to get the job as you will be doing ON the job then that’s also bullshit. You can definitely push back. Start politely, of course, but say you stand by your portfolio work. If they want to hire you just for sketch/idea stage first, they can do that, and then decide whether to go further past that, but you must prioritize paying work.

Protect yourself!

—Agent Negative Space

Absolutely NO! If they don’t have the budget then design without art. This just makes me mad. 

You have plenty exposure on your site and promo emails. If your work is good and strong, AD will reach out to you. 

Oh wait, AD DID reach out to you because he/she wanted your work.  

—Agent Bleed

P.S. Here’s a great “Should I work for free?” chart by Jessica Hische. http://shouldiworkforfree.com/

NOTE: If you wish to have your name added, sign the petition here: https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/Stephen_Fry_Reconsider_your_approach_to_Spec_Work

Background info: I was alerted to these two spec-work items aimed at promoting Stephen Fry's latest book, 'More Fool Me' by the blog ShitSpecWork.tumblr.com I've been a fan of Stephen. He's charismatic, intelligent, eloquent. What's not to like? These two Spec Work items has greatly disappointed me, and the resulting glum has haunted me for weeks, so I decided to write this open letter. Details can be found on http://yourfry.com/details. and https://www.talenthouse.com/i/design-a-poster-for-stephen-fry. This has been spotted by the site shitspecwork.tumblr.com. More info on what is classified as Spec Work can be found here: 

http://www.aiga.org/position-spec-work/

http://www.nospec.com/faq

Dear Stephen, 

You strike us as an all-round good guy. Intelligent, vulnerable, funny, and we don't believe you would ever do something that cause someone else harm.

In that spirit, we are writing you to kindly reconsider the approach you've taken (or allowed your publisher to take) to promote your latest book 'More Fool Me'. We're referring specifically to the YourFry Mashup invite. and your poster contest. 

Inviting a bunch of creative mash-ups aimed ultimately at promoting your book, may seem like a harmless, fun exercise on the surface. But it truly isn't. Two reasons why this is actually a harmful exercise: Firstly, most respondents to this challenge would fall into the category young creatives, eager to make a mark in the industry, and willing to create something for nothing but exposure. It perpetuates the notion already held by many end clients that asking for something for nothing is completely acceptable. We'll assure you that the eventual result of this kind of thinking can be felt by the entire creative industry: from the bankruptcy of post production company Rhythm and Hues (despite winning Academy Awards on the year they close down) as well as the ill-health of the post production industry in general, to the average freelancer battling requests for pitches or 'free samples' from clients who are too pampered to make a judgement based on their portfolio as to whether they're the right fit for the job or not.  Secondly, these mash-ups involve the use of what's actually a highly specialised set of skills. Illustration, animation, film-making, and so on, are all fields in which to create something that's truly great requires an enormous amount of hard work, skill, and dedication. Asking for the end product without offering proper financial reward, makes it look like we all do this for a 'hobby', and that our profession is not a difficult one, requiring enormous amount of rigorous training and experience. It diminishes the value of professional training that a lot of artists like us have gone through in order to pursue our dreams to the best of our abilities.  As for the request to design tour posters for you, the same arguments apply as the above. Instead of following the respectable method of approaching the appropriate artists / designers for the posters and paying them to create a range of options, your team wants the luxury of getting thousands of choices without paying a single cent. Again, you're helping to foster the damaging trend that artistic talent isn't worth much, and it's perfectly fine to get something for nothing.  In summary, the entire premise of these two things is a little hurtful and insulting, and it is hard not to feel disappointed that you, Stephen, of all people, would stand behind your publisher for something that cheapens the dream of supporting oneself through one's passion. Perhaps you, Stephen Fry, can afford to do something for nothing, but we can't. Some of us are involved in the very real struggle of making ends meet, which we speculate is something that you haven't had to worry about in a long, long time. 

We illustrators and artists love our work, just like you love yours. We train for years and years, in school as well as afterwards, honing our craft with patience, sweat, blood, and tears. We cannot help being in this profession. As a wise person once said, it's like a compulsion. People who choose to be in creative fields are simply obeying the irresistible 'calling' they feel within their souls. It takes courage and determination to get someplace whereby you can pay your bills doing it. The passion and the drive sees us executing commissions to as excellent a standard as possible; sometimes beyond what the money would pay for. In truth, in an ideal world we won't have to worry about calculating how fair our monetary compensation is, and just let ourselves get lost in the work. 

Unfortunately, in the world of commerce, this attitude has been taken advantage of, time and time again. And in the market where admittedly supply is higher than demand, illustrators, artists, and designers are facing an increasingly difficult challenge to be allowed to pursue their passion and keep a roof over their heads.  So please, Stephen, rethink this competition a little. We truly believe your marketing team shares the blame (if not fully shoulders it). As a highly respectable, popular public figure, you have enormous power to educate them and the rest of the world on why this is not an acceptable way to treat artists. If this trend is allowed to continue, we'll be choking artists out of what they do best: creating beauty to make this world a less grim place.  We truly believe you know the right thing to do now. Please, help us stand up against Spec Work, starting with what's currently going on with YourFry.com. Thank you in advance for listening, and for your time.  Best,  Lilian Darmono Jing Zhang Dan Woodger Michiel Van Den Berg David Andrews