The cancer toll on nuclear workers: $15.5 billion in compensation and counting Nuclear fallout: $15.5 billion in compensation and counting They built our atomic bombs; now they’re dying of cancer Nearly 33,500 former nuclear site workers died due to radiation exposure- report NUCLEAR INDUSTRY WORKERS FACE INEVITABLE AND UNAVOIDABLE RADIATION HEALTH RISKS Nuclear industry workers face…

TL;DR: Rabbits-of-negative-euphoria’s post is objectively wrong. Multiple studies show that the belief that a newborn isn’t the cutest is a typical belief.

This post fascinates me because it is Objectively Wrong. When anyone uses the phrase “objectively wrong”, they’re claiming that something is wrong in an objective way rather than subjective or biased way : with a basis in observable facts rather than feelings or opinions.

Now, if @rabbits-of-negative-euphoria ‘s statement was true, then the “rule” that they refer to would be backed up by scientific studies. The thing is that multiple scientific studies discovered that a counter claim could very well be the standard. I’ve provided links below.

Rabbits posts is objectively wrong. Rabbits is entitled to hold the opinion that a infant is cute on the grounds of small stature and lack of independence. However, it’s only an opinion. Presenting their opinion as fact could make a negative impact on parents of newborns who don’t find the newborn particularly pleasing to the eye.

The option selected from this post

(Marinette wishes to know Hawkmoth’s identity)

-Marinette decided that the simplest wish would be the best. She wished to know Hawkmoth’s  and Mayura’s identity

-Her mind flashed, she saw a casket, a comatose woman that looked familiar. She could see Hawkmoth standing over it, she could see him De-transform, she knew who he was. She was right, it was Gabriel Agreste. 

-She heard him speak “Nathalie’s Sacrifice and my work were not in vain, we fixed the Peacock Miraculous, We will soon have the Ladybug and Cat miraculous, and you will be here with us again.”

- She undid her transformation, reverting back to her civilian self, she held her knees. Gabriel Agreste was Hawkmoth. Nathalie’s Sacrifice? Was she part of it? Was she Mayura?

- Her partner asked if she was okay.  Covering his eyes to ensure he didn't look.

-She assured him she was okay, without looking at him.

-Ladybug took off the ring, fed tikki to retransform back into Ladybug and had Plagg hand it back to her partner.

-”Gabriel Agreste is Hawkmoth.”

-Chat noir was very shocked to hear that.

-”Wait didn't we already see that he wasn't?”

-”We were mislead, likely a ruse to make sure we never figured it out.”

-Chat noir had to take that into account. The wish had no reason to lie.

-”Why? Why was he doing this?”

-Ladybug tried to think, she remembered her vision.

-”I don't know the details, but he was standing over a glass casket. Someone was inside.”

-”My mother?...” Chat noir muttered aloud

-”Huh?”

- Chat noir realized what he muttered aloud.

-The two failed to realize that there was an invisible creature watching from the shadows, and it caught a glimpse of the two detransforming, 

New Post has been published on https://is.gd/JuTU9E

WASHINGTON | Survey of economists: Some Trump policies could slow growth

WASHINGTON  — U.S. business economists are concerned about the risks of some of President Donald Trump’s economic policies, saying they fear his tariffs and higher budget deficits could eventually slow the economy.

More than 90 percent of economists surveyed by the National Association for Business Economics in a report being released Monday said they think the Trump administration’s current and threatened tariffs will harm the economy.

The administration has imposed tariffs on goods from many of America’s main trading partners — from China and Europe to Mexico and Canada. Trump officials argue that the tariffs, which are taxes on imports, will help the administration gain more favorable terms of trade. But so far, U.S. trading partners have simply retaliated with tariffs of their own.

Seven in 10 of the economists surveyed by the NABE said they thought Trump’s tax cuts were “too stimulative” because of the resulting increase in the national debt, even though two-thirds said the corporate tax cuts generally benefit their companies.

The 251 respondents, surveyed between July 19 and Aug. 2, said they do envision some of Trump’s policies as supporting the economy. Eighty percent, for example, told the NABE that the administration’s efforts to ease regulations would boost growth in the short run.

As a whole, though, the responses of the business economists represent a rebuke of the Trump administration’s overall approach to the economy. The administration has been hailing a recent pickup in growth as heralding the start of an enduring and more vigorous economic boom.

Job gains have been solid, and the economy expanded at a brisk 4.1 percent annual pace in the April-June quarter. The Trump team has also portrayed a bump in retail sales and the confidence expressed in surveys of consumers and small businesses as evidence of more robust growth ahead.

“Our economy, our investors, our workforce are crushing it right now,” Larry Kudlow, the top White House economic adviser, said at a Cabinet meeting Thursday. “Any business economist worth his or her salt would look at these trends and tell you we’re going for a while.”

But the surveyed business economists said they thought the $1.5 trillion in tax cuts over the next decade would produce higher budget deficits that should be reduced. The survey showed that while the economists expect the tax cuts to boost the economy this year, 62 percent forecast that the lower taxes would accelerate growth by an annual average of just 0.1 percent or less through 2027.

Though most respondents told the NABE that they thought the administration’s drive to end many regulations would lift growth in the short run, nearly half said they felt deregulation would have negative consequences over the long term.

In addition, 60 percent said they believed economic policy should do more to address climate change. The Trump administration announced last year that it was withdrawing the United States from an international climate accord that was designed to reduce carbon emissions.