If you have time or feel like answering, Iâd like to hear your thoughts on how much of Turinâs tragic life issues are the result from the curse, versus how much from the consequences of his actions, and how much does his belief that he is cursed play a part?
a very good question that I donât really have a solid answer for. ultimately I think that the curse was deliberately written to be somewhat ambiguous.
looking at TĂșrinâs mistakes, some of the awful things he did were definitely more accidental than others. TĂșrin had never actually met NiĂ«nor before finding an amnesiac NĂniel. how was he supposed to know that this was his long-lost sister, who was supposed to be in Doriath?
TĂșrin stabbed Beleg because it was dark and stormy outside and he was suddenly awoken by a blade cutting his foot. when youâre stabbed in your sleep while youâre imprisoned at a torture camp, I donât think your first thought is going to be âoh good my friend is here to save me. by stabbing me.â
these sorts of events can easily be chalked up to the curse or the actions of Glaurung. Glaurung wiped NiĂ«norâs memories and sent her in TĂșrinâs direction. and killing Beleg definitely wasnât TĂșrinâs intention. in the latter case, the narrator supports the reading that this was the fault of the curse; see the wording of âbut fate was that day more strongâ, implying that the curse caused Belegâs knife to slip and cut TĂșrin
(side note: I question if TĂșrin and NiĂ«nor fell in love naturally and it was all just a really unfortunate and unintentional coincidence, or if their marriage was designed as part of Morgothâs plan. we already know that Glaurung can influence minds psychically, it wouldnât be too much of a stretch to say that his skill set includes love spells. Glaurung is cancelled for shipping incest.)
yet there are other events that feel much less ambiguous. TĂșrin killed Brandir. this wasnât self defense, nor was it a case of mistaken identity. just straight up murder. TĂșrin also disregarded Aerinâs claims that killing Brodda would only bring about more troubleâbasically claiming that he knew more about his auntâs abuse than she didâand this results in her suicide. TĂșrin was told by elves who had received direct messages from the gods that Nargothrond would only stand if it were to remain hidden, and he still stubbornly insisted that Nargothrond must reveal itself.
this is where the âTĂșrinâs fault vs the curseâs faultâ argument gets murky. did Morgoth force TĂșrin to kill Brandir? if he did, does that mean TĂșrin ever actually had free will? letâs look at how Morgoth himself describes the curse:
But upon all whom you love my thought shall weigh as a cloud of Doom, and it shall bring them down into darkness and despair. Wherever they go, evil shall arise. Whenever they speak, their words shall bring ill counsel. Whatsoever they do shall turn against them. They shall die without hope, cursing both life and death.
Morgoth actually does influence TĂșrinâs actions. I disagree with the idea that TĂșrin has no free will since everything was actually Morgothâs doing, and that none of his actions could be considered his fault, yet Tolkien does outright tell us that TĂșrin really wasnât the only person influencing TĂșrinâs worst mistakes. and we know that Glaurung too can directly influence TĂșrinâs mind, seeing how Glaurung made TĂșrin run away from the battle of Nargothrond by overpowering his mind and convincing him that his mother and sister needed his help more than Finduilas.
the âTĂșrinâs fault vs the curseâs faultâ argument can lead to two very different opinions. on one side, you can argue that Brandirâs death wasnât TĂșrinâs fault because Morgoth forced him to do it. on the other side, you can argue that TĂșrin is a cruel man who uses the idea of a curse as an excuse for his selfish actions.
both sides have their poor-pissing pitfalls. if nothing was ever really TĂșrinâs fault, then that honestly makes TĂșrin a rather boring character, more of a puppet being pulled along Morgothâs string than a multi-dimensional character capable of thinking for himself. he wouldnât be a character who does things, heâd just be a character that things happen to. and if you think the curse isnât real and just an excuse, then, well thatâs just stupid because we the readers are literally present in the scene where Morgoth lays his curse on him. like this is a fantasy world where a dinosaur can factory reset a woman, but you draw the line at the idea that curses exist in this story.
I think the influence of the curse was more of an urge than a compelling force upon TĂșrin. Morgoth was a force in TĂșrinâs mind, a sort of anti-conscience or a gut feeling. TĂșrin was never forced against his will to do anything awful, but his immediate gut reaction to certain situations came from Morgothâs malice. TĂșrin doesnât have to do anything Morgoth wants him to do, itâs just very hard to resist. Iâm imagining it being kind of like the dark urge in bg3, or the cartoon trope of the devil on your shoulder.
the answer lies somewhere in the middle of the fate vs free will question. but what does âthe middleâ mean? how much does the curse really influence TĂșrinâs mind? can TĂșrin be blamed for some actions more than others? did the curse affect TĂșrinâs personality? was the curse a mental illness? itâs up to the reader to decide.
(having read some takes in this fandom, I could just take the cheap route and say that everything that my blorbo supposedly did wrong was actually just that dastardly Pengolodh slandering my precious pookie bear. um akshually we donât know if TĂșrin really killed Saeros or if itâs just in-universe propagandaâïžđ€)