#monetary fraud

I believe that I'm in one of the smallest interpersonal minority’s comprised of people who thoroughly enjoy entertaining paradigm threats that force the individual to reconstruct convictions from a new elementary foundation. I would love to hear a pragmatic, air-tight argument supporting creationism, the return of the mythical Jesus and his misfit band of Israelis or a stimulating dialogue idealizing eugenics, because all of these concepts challenge my intellectual foundation, and this foundational shift forces me to reevaluate the social lens I've constructed with a new depth and dimension. In short, it enriches my mind and subsequently my life thereafter. Unfortunately, in the unlikely event that historical records of any kind begin to suggest the possibility of Jesus having existed at all, there is absolutely no chance that this ridiculous quagmire of a homicide, embodying an overwhelming deceleration of potential progress would ever resurface on this planet. This fictional, glorified, bird house builder would be institutionalized and scolded for shit work on Angie's List.  It is perplexing that "God" made the heavens and Saturn's Rings, Aurora Borealis, the double helix of DNA and a book. Paris Hilton wrote a book, and God apparently wrote a book a little longer. Everything "God" created is well beyond the capacity of human understanding, much less human synthesis, besides a book. In retrospect, that is without a doubt the shittiest thing he created, and yet I know the name of the Pope but I don't know, nor do I know of anyone who can name a single person on the human genome project. He made that too. No one cares. I'm going to have to assume that every book ever written was written by man, because it would embarrass me to say that there are 131 million books written by man and 1 dictated by "God".  That sounds grossly out of character and an absurd deviation from the clear pattern: author- long winded guy, author- long winded guy, etc. times 131 million. Before I lose the entire demographic of unreasonable people, I have heard one rational, pragmatic argument outlining the plausibility of a creator and challenging contemporary beliefs regarding evolution, but it was detractive in nature, offering little in the way of alternative explanations. (I spent the 45 minutes following that period trying desperately to find that lecture online. If anyone cares, the intriguing questions raised were by Kent Hovind, with the charming title “100 Reasons why evolution is so stupid” at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Up-0E4Qetfg. His stance is unreasonable, yet he does raise some sobering questions.)  

I am in a growing minority of people who are deeply interested in obtaining answers, getting a clear understanding and refraining from hasty dismissals of deviant thought. Prior to 2006 I had a complete construct of the world that was comforting in its simplicity and ignorance. Then I hopped in the car and traveled the country, landing in Portland, Oregon for a lengthy duration. I settled in a bazaar, cultural bubble of the over-educated and underemployed. In late summer 2007 I was invited to play music with an established producer 2 hours outside of Portland, although, in retrospect, it felt like days away from the grid and my notions of reality. On the car ride to this life altering weekend I inquired some details about the person we were going to meet, to which my close friend Peter, with a complete understanding of my cynicism toward the vagrants populating Portland, responded "He's a militant anarchist outwardly verbal regarding anti-establishment." It was so ridiculous and amusing that I fell into a fit of laughter that clearly expressed my dismissal of the statement as solely for amusement, and Peter dropped the subject without clarifying it as entirely accurate. So I subsequently went into this meeting completely blind to the fact that I was going to spend the weekend in a reality far removed from my previous 26 years on earth.

Fortunately this person, who entered and exited my life in a single weekend, engaged my interests tactfully, leaving an impression that was harmless, palatable and unassuming. He started from my square-one, not the global banking, Rothschild heiristocracy perpetuating and funding all sides of harm and violence, capitalizing off the military-industrial complex and hoarding gold in subterranean vaults, setting the price of gold as a global traded commodity twice a day free from auditing while harnessing a majority interest in all reserve banks and global GDP with an unpublished, speculative net worth larger than that of every country combined, in a modest estimation of several hundred trillion dollars which in the hypothetical wake of its altruistic redistribution back to the globe would undoubtedly send us into a universal utopia of unprecedented proportions. Fortunately he didn't start there. He came off as intelligent, reasonable, articulate and well informed with regard to the social text and more interestingly the subtext; informative not unlike Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States. It was a plain, apparent and undeniable account of an obvious misrepresentation of historical events and contemporary policies. Up to this point I had immediately discredited deviant speculation as conspiracy theory, but this anarchist whose name I can't even remember turned me onto literature that deconstructed my world view with logic that was undeniable.

I have since learned to keep my mouth shut regarding all dissenting information as it takes far too much effort to explain the blatant inconsistencies in the official stories. There's no point in explaining that all sources are equally credible because credibility comes from the logic in your understanding of the information, not from the source itself. What happens when the newspaper is owned by manipulative, wealthy people publishing in the interest of the capitalists?  Well, they pull their money out of the stock market, publish fraudulent information to mislead the public about competitive banks, causing pandemonium and financial collapse, while the very people who caused the crisis buy out devastated banks for a fraction of their worth and plunge an entire country into a depression. The collapse of 1929 is very well documented, main-stream information at this point. It's moronic to trust established sources of information after perpetuating criminal fraud that makes Bernard Madoff come off as genuine.

In 2008, there was a global financial crisis that effected wealth universally across the globe. Suddenly every country lost fiscal value... simultaneously. There was endless speculation as to the cause of the greatest financial collapse since the criminal deception of 1929. Listen to the news to this day and you will find the most qualified, educated experts explaining the cause of the collapse. Of course they were nowhere to be found in 2007, but they have definitive information after the fact. For starters, if I was a middle aged professional economist I would be embarrassed to show my face in public spouting garbage with credentials unless I published information about the collapse beforehand. If I'm an expert and I couldn't see this coming I am a sad, dimwitted failure that deserves air time as some intellectual elephant man. Witness a life of work in financial understanding amounting to absolutely nothing. Buy a fucking ticket to see an expert who has wasted his entire life. You only live once and this suit and tie contributed absolutely nothing in his one chance at life. Try not to cry as you witness the most appalling excuse of human life.

What’s even more important is that these people are explaining global financial collapse. You don't need more than ten minutes to explain the concept of currency from scratch to establish an elementary understanding capable of easily recognizing that currency doesn't disappear universally. Anyone with even a GED who has the audacity to say, "Yeah, and then all the money disappeared," is unfit to live without restraints or supervision, and yet we have veteran experts explaining this and people actually believe them. It's clearly not a credible source if it lacks the principles of simple logic. Money never disappears. It gets stolen. It gets repossessed. But universal bankruptcy is sophomoric. You can say global currency was approximately 600 trillion dollars and now it is 100 trillion dollars. In this case based on the principle of scarcity, each unit would be worth 6 times its previous amount. You can say wealth was predominately held by Western Europe with an annual GDP of 400 trillion in 2007 while China had a GDP of 100 trillion that same year, and their respective GDP's for 2009 had shifted to 100 trillion and 400 trillion. That would mean that a lot of unproductive, arrogant white people went broke very quickly. You could also say that the global gross amount of currency due to fractional reserve banking went from 100 trillion to 500 trillion between 2007 and 2009. In that case handing a homeless man your empty Coke can as a gesture of generosity rather than throwing it on the ground would be 5 times more offensive than it was two years earlier, unless you're in Maine, in which case it would be 2.5 times more offensive, as long as the homeless man had moved there within the past two years, which might explain why there's less violence in that state. But you're an embarrassment to your profession to mouth off about all the money disappearing. It's ridiculously laughable.

Money is a concept. It represents goods, resources, property and services. Hypothetically, if 3.5 billion people filed onto an arc carrying their houses, cars, watches, cookies, plutonium, potable water, more cookies, profitable thoughts, dildos, bonds and the trademark for Pacman and his wife, disabled the arcs GPS and sailed into the Bermuda triangle, without warning, never to be seen again, then its plausible that all the money lost its value simultaneously, but even in that event there would be an absurd amount of job openings and automation, 3D electronic printing and acreage, not to mention the phenomenal resilience of human intellectual capacity to resolve issues creating evolutionary claves at an unprecedented rate and reckless alcohol induced, trailer park condom-less sex to repopulate every lost Denny's waitress for night-shift bottomless coffee at 4% gratuity.

I have yet to hear "credible" bankers or economists mentioning the fact that reserve banks, including the Fed are privately owned. This means the US doesn't own its currency; it borrows money from private entities resulting in unaffordable interest. If there is 100 trillion dollars of US currency in circulation, all 100 trillion, plus the interest on it is actually owned by the private interests of the Federal Reserve. If the established medium of value across the globe is currency, the United States has zero dollars. Monetization is suspiciously much more convoluted than that, but no matter how much Wall Street verbiage one can throw at this equation, the result is always the same. Here are a few insignificant, vacant branches that would be denied access to the Federal Reserve and their monopolistic spreadsheets: The President, the Supreme Court, the CIA, FBI, the IRS, the Treasury Department, THE IRS and THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT. That means that a few elusive people, who are completely off of the Forbes’s radar own all of the currency, most likely in concert with any reserve banks operating in roughly every country across the globe. That is the entire news story. Any "credible" news organization working in the interest of disclosure to illuminate the most important, pressing issues of the day would put forth endless investigative resources for full, accurate, objective exposure, because at the honest root of investigative journalism are people and their relation to anything, which is apparently monetized. The money trail is the story. We invaded Iraq, supposedly looking for weapons of mass destruction. We're still active militarily despite the fact that the official story went cold. Ultimately, what did it amount to? An evident disregard for humanity and 2 trillion dollars, that’s it. That money didn't disappear, nor did money disappear in the financial wake of 2008. It went somewhere. Technically, the US has no currency. The Federal Reserve issues currency in the form of Federal Reserve notes. The story blatantly became death and money, and not one news organization is following the money, which clearly becomes the story of the war in Iraq. That, without question, discredits "credible" sources as infallible and influential as The New York Times. That paper amounts to a steaming heap of misdirection that actively institutionalizes its patrons as human capital.  Bernard Madoff and Enron are patsies for a criminal element that would dwarf 10,000 Madoff’s and Enron’s combined. That’s a practical number not to be glazed over. Imagine living through one Enron a day for 27 years. That would be less disastrous than what is happening today, regarding private proprietorship of the Federal Reserve and the useless redundancy of the US Treasury Department. Follow the arithmetic.    

If you do some digging you will find that the Rothschild dynasty has funded both sides of almost every war or conflict since the Napoleonic wars. They became the wealthiest family on the globe, bar none, during the 1800s. They were the financial backers for every profitable bank in England, France, Great Britain and Austria, as well as financing the building of the rail system in Europe, backing Andrew Carnegie's US steel, The National City Bank of Cleveland which in turn financed John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil and possessed a dominant 81% share of JPMorgan. That's all front page news if you follow the bullshit that the mainstream pushes out. It's not remotely conspiracy, yet the strange thing is that they seem to go off the financial radar in the 1920s.  They're obviously still prominent and conspicuous, but not nearly to the extent that their wealth and power warrants. You know how rappers reference Rockefella? That’s a colloquial expression representing power and dominance. John D. Rockefeller is the non-monopoly single proprietorship of Baltic Ave. while the Rothschild’s own the rest of the entire Monopoly board with Hotels. They were the most prominent banking family on the globe, and today the central bank is privately owned. I have to assume that since the Rothschild's had financial, controlling interest in anything profitable since before the industrial revolution, that they must have omitted their name from financial prominence since the disproportionate level of wealth is criminal and sickening. If you're apprehensive, explain to me why the Rothschild's set the global price for gold as a traded commodity? They have control over the commodity that once backed the entire US currency. That's plain information that you can find from any source, despite the fact that it's appalling. They set the price for gold, yet Bill Gates is regularly touted as the wealthiest. Why? They have over 150 plant and animal species named after them. It's absurd, yet no one seems to take any of this insolent, tyrannical excrement seriously.

Hong Kong is one of the most lucrative financial hubs on the globe. I’ve been alive since 1982, and not once in my life have I ever heard anyone mention the fact that Hong Kong was part of the British Empire until 1997. I received a bachelor’s degree without ever hearing this ridiculous fact. Hong Kong is the most densely populated and least diverse city on the globe. You can’t swing a dead cat from a restaurant window without Feng Shuing, a math prodigy on a bamboo rickshaw late for Kama sutra with giggling chicks in the Mandarin province of Chang. It’s that Chinese. As in no British anywhere, yet Hong Kong was fucking British until 1997, and no one ever mentions this at all, as if it’s not a piece of the puzzle. If it was British, and it’s well documented that the Rothschild’s clearly backed the British in all military industrial endeavors since the 19th century, it would be obtuse to assume that the Rothschild’s didn’t have their avarice mitts in this humanitarian atrocity.     

These facts, to my astonishment, are easily dismissed. They are viewed as conspiracy, yet I only listed accounts that are well established facts about the family; just the facts that they themselves own up to, and "reputable" sources have verified. What we have is a family that has established and financed the most profitable banks and industries for well over 100 years and the fact that the central banks in the dominant industrial countries are privately owned. Then there is the conspicuous lack of information regarding the private interests of the people behind these banks. The US tax payers bailed out banks that are member banks of the Federal Reserve System, the central banks that create the currency, to the tune of 900 billion dollars. That's exactly the same as everyone individually buying 100 pints of ice cream and renting a refrigerated U-Haul to deliver the ice cream that you just purchased back to Ben and Jerry. Who gives a shit if they fail? They can easily put a new name on it, and the money is going to the same place. Have all the economists forgotten the deception that led to the consolidation of wealth in 1929? How is it possible to get so lost in the convoluted world of high finance that you overlook simple, elementary nonsense? Yeah, the single mother of 6, substitute teacher needs a forth mortgage. Definitely approve that. Why not? Because they’re all anonymous sperm bank children with no child support? Who cares? The system failed because it was designed to fail, intentionally. There were private jets and 8 figure bonuses’ because they don’t care. Humanity is at its peak, intellectually every day. The amount of conniving, backstabbing, manipulation it takes to get to the top of global control leaves no room for careless bankrupting accidents. They asked for a bail out because they can do that whenever they want to, and they obviously don’t care about people at all. There was never any crisis. Just like the crash of 1929, there was only news that you heard about several years after a reckless round table of Adolph Stalin’s came up with it. They don’t make mistakes. If you find Wall Street insiders giving any other explanation for the crisis they are culpable in the sinister perpetuation of the worst evil known on earth.

I'm going to assert speculation that should be taken with more authority than information distributed as fact by media moguls with private interests, because I am admitting that it's speculation and because I don't stand to benefit at all from the information I'm delivering as an amalgamation of information I've read from various sources and filtered using logic. There is an interesting segment of a documentary on YouTube asserting that the Rothschild's dynasty owned a controlling interest in the sum total of global capital; their wealth being estimated at 500 trillion dollars. It's ludicrous until you logically project the family's capital from the final public records of their wealth in accordance with exponential global inflation due to the practice of fractional reserve banking after the abolishment of the gold standard. Also, I feel obligated to ask myself: If central banks are privately owned and there has never been any sort of regulation or public audit of the privately owned central banks, why is there no information about their owners, their reach, their earning potential and their value? If these banks had 3 trillion dollars, with an earning potential of 250 billion a year, that information would be palatable with little to no need for blatant, offensive secrecy. The logical answer to that question in a pragmatic rational breakdown given the limited public information that is irritatingly absent from the news is that the reason for the secrecy behind the private ownership of the banks that ultimately control those very countries they lend to is because the information that is untold is sickening. The amount of information that is misleading or absent from public records would elicit universal public hostility and action. Obviously, since the US owns absolutely no currency that is not owed to the Federal Reserve, that private group is financially responsible for the unnecessary death of countless people. These private banks have financed a war under the "credible" assertion that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. They own and control the country and they are recruiting and killing our citizen’s right in front of our eyes, and I'm the lunatic for connecting dots that lead to a place that's uncomfortable. That's fine, feel free to get your news from the same people who told you about the nonexistent weapons in Iraq, or the people that said the money has all disappeared. Not to worry, they are the same people that are killing people every day and sleeping soundly by night.

You know what else is uncomfortably absent from the news? There was a third skyscraper that was not hit by a plane that collapsed on September 11th. It was the 7th building in the world trade center complex. I know that this is under-reported, as it is all but absent from The 9/11 Commission. I used to mention it in my comedy act until I realized that no one had heard of it; no one, meaning maybe 10% of the audience had a semblance of an idea. What is known from records prior to the attacks is that aside from Fort Knox, building 7 housed one of the largest reserves of gold in history totaling 300 billion in gold bars in its sublevel vaults. Less than 500 million of which was recovered. Again, that point regarding the recovery is speculation as very few people have access to this information. What we do know for certain is that an unjustifiable war was financed by private interests in the wake of a "terrorist attack" ( I refuse to own up to regurgitating misinformation established by people who blatantly lied about the war itself as well as the global financial crisis and countless other mistruths, but feel free to believe institutions that have obviously lied regarding issues leading to widespread uncompromising human negligence) that resulted in the under-reported collapse of a building that was never hit by a plane, which housed billions in gold, and the fact that, in a completely unrelated note, a global banking family happens to hoard gold and fix the global price of gold and has a history of financing wars dating back to Napoleon. Those are just the public facts, which beg the uncomfortable question, what the fuck are they suppressing? Fraudulent claims regarding global warming to find yet another way to tax oil with regard to carbon output? The patent for batteries that allowed for the electric cars of the 90s? Wars? Murder? Famine? Unprecedented avarice, cures for cancer, eugenics, pooling large amounts of donated blood leading to vast amounts of contamination in underdeveloped countries that have no value with regard to human capital, intellectual property, minerals or resources? Indoctrination towards subservience under the guise of education leading to a thoughtless profitable population? What is the honest reason gold is valuable whatsoever? The Rothschild's know. Does anyone else? It's not nourishing. It's irritating when people say, "because it's pretty." That’s clearly an asinine, hollow rationalization. At its most polished it looks heavy and unappealing, especially when compared to platinum, most gems, mercury, plutonium every liquid in the form of a pure solution, fossilization, or even a really good skipping stone. If I had no preconceived notions about gold and I found it in its natural unpolished state right next to a stone I could skip 12 times with confidence, I wouldn't even acknowledge the aesthetically bankrupt hunk of gold. Can someone give me a plausible explanation to its value? All of these questions are readily labeled conspiracy theory, but the entities financing all global atrocities have no public records. They may be sound like ridiculous questions, but they deserve a respectable discourse that doesn’t end with the indoctrinated portion of the argument contributing nothing but patronizing personal attacks. Global warming is an issue. I’ve never met someone who has proof of this, just people who have repeated information someone else collected. In fact the only evidence that is readily noticeable to a small portion of the entrepreneurs is a tax on carbon emissions. Every summer I go to the ocean where a cottage hangs precariously over an eroding sand dune, and every year I expect that house to be absent from the panoramic seascape but it’s still there. I’ve been waiting for that house to get washed away for 31 years. At this point I expect Jesus to return before that house falls. If carbon emissions are leading to global warming why isn’t there strict regulations preventing this? Nothing, but the same carbon output plus a tax. We had fully functioning electric cars in the 1990s. The patents for the batteries were purchased in the interest of potential oil revenue, and thousands of the cars were intentionally destroyed. Wikipedia explains “the oil companies were afraid of losing their monopoly on transportation fuel over the coming decades; while the auto companies feared short term costs for EV development and long term revenue loss because EVs require little maintenance and no tune-ups.” What is apparent is that capital gain takes precedent over anything on earth, including the earth itself. Money comes first and no one will shed light on global capital hoarding. That’s front page news, and every day that The New York Times prints something else is yet another testament to the blatant misdirection of this terrifying journalistic success story.     

 We have a right to be angry. We're misinformed and mislead and were dying because of it. Gold is ugly, the wealth of the globe didn't spontaneously disappear, and the educated are making one figure an hour just to be called incompetent by an asshole who doesn't know how to order a fucking sandwich. On a personal tangent, I've spent decades eating at a range of establishments and I can't recall a single time I received the wrong order, ever. I do recall having several servers’ mention the college they attended. I've spent over 16 years in the service industry and I'm baffled by the ubiquitous inability to order food by grown adults. We're not speaking Cantonese. A moderate change in inflexion doesn't signify the difference between what you do and don't want, "I don't want onions, mushrooms... uh bacon, oh croutons," "OK you said I don't want, then you listed several ingredients in several tones rather than separating the ingredients with a cogent modifier like 'I do want.' You're 50 years old. Rattling off ingredients with varying levels of excitement doesn't change the fact that, grammatically you just ordered a God damn salad with no fucking ingredients." Alas, that is the majority. It's plain to see a blatant social discord in the daily minutia. Armed with logic it's easy become marginalized, disenfranchised and labeled stupid or insane by people folding into irrational Stockholm behavior, driving nicer cars than you and asking for nothing more out of their life than the Latin death grip of ownership and medical coverage. Where's the wealth? I enjoy cultural happenings but they don't detract from my desire to enable us, the people, to reach our potential. There's more, and I want it. What's a secure emergency account of money? Six months of rent or mortgage, car payments, gas, internet and food? Well that's out of my reach. I'll settle with enough emergency money to get a bone saw, a shovel and a shotgun. The most irritating part of educating oneself beyond scholastic indoctrination is that you are still forced to entertain absurd conversations in alliance with the ridiculous, irrational ubiquitous stream of delusion because it’s not worth the effort to offer a thought provoking concept of any kind, that doesn’t conform to the established, “credible” blatant fallacies.

Here’s some obvious foresight. Horrible people have always inflated money, then contracted and consolidated wealth periodically. This happens to take a controlling interest in anything and everything profitable. Evolution and unregulated population growth dictates that an exponential technological surplus is inevitable. New products as well as intellectual property will pop up at alarming rates. As a result, aristocratic tyrants are going to apply the very same unoriginal thoughtless game of inflation, contraction, but logically it will have to speed up, barring any political intervention. This means that your investment should be limited to the ever more frequent lows. When you see disenfranchised, middle aged, white males picketing on Wall Street, buy. Then dump it when people are almost happy. Just past panicked, the populous will breathe some relief, BBQ on the forth, and as soon as you see the first sign of joy, sell everything and hold tight until the crime rate peaks again. It’s not entirely that simple though. If you are 20 years old, hypothetically you have another 60 years to deal with terrified capitalists grasping at straws. 60 years ago there were 3 prevalent television stations, no cell phone or internet. In that time, the electric car came, lost their patents to the oil industry, went, and now there is “global warming.” If you had intellectual concepts brewing, you had to go to a library, use a type writer, dui decimal some experts on another continent and wait 6 weeks for a response second hand through a translator. That’s all immediate now, reinforcing the baffling exponential potential before you die. The people in power are not the most intelligent people on the planet. They buy the intelligent as paid minions, but it is clear that at the rate of growth they will have to resort to catastrophic responses to keep up with human potential. So we can expect an ever increasing cycle of growth and recession to consolidate wealth and power, but progress at this rate leads to unpredictable behavior. For them, it is whatever means necessary: Death, war (that’s obvious), famine due to an introduced parasite, China already has population control, so potential sterilization from chemicals used to fight this synthetic parasite. These are clearly conspiracy theories and should be taken as such, but it is to make a larger point that life altering changes are inevitable within our lifetime. Within the next 20 years I assert a new standard of electronic financial exchange. If it’s slightly out of the hands of the Rothschild’s and global bankers, the backlash will make the current recession seem abundant. There are so many things to fight for, but at the top of the agenda is free, private multimedia expression, because our cognitive freedom of exchange trumps their ability to keep up. Because of unrestricted intellectual and technological growth, the means by which the people at the top are going to ensure that they stay at the top is going to become more erratic and sinister than the humanitarian negligence of the 20th century. The holocaust is the most keenly distressing, but it pales in comparison to the volume of atrocities by Mao Zedong. The most promising defense is our social freedoms, our ability to communicate globally. Armed with logic and the dissemination of alternative views, we get a multidimensional humanitarian perspective that will serve as a collective awareness and allow us to take action in the interest of the people and ultimately true progress.

www.danmccort.com

Follow me at:

https://www.facebook.com/comedian.dan.mccort

http://danmccort.blogspot.com/

Feel free to respond publicly or directly to me at:

[email protected]

[email protected]

My special, Audible Toxicology, will be out later this year on a well-established and very public forum.