🐶💛| DANIELLE'S THIRD HEARING
Details from the early-morning hearing in the ADOR vs. Danielle case were leaked, and the judge placed several restrictions on the plaintiff's team (ADOR/HYBE)
The judge scolded ADOR over the media spectacle and told them the evidence they presented felt intended to the journalists.
He only allowed them to explain the evidence to the court, but not "put up a show" for the media.
This happened because ADOR brought a PowerPoint presentation with Telegram screenshots pasted into a Word document.
Telegram screenshots were prohibited.
ADOR agreed to limit itself to explaining the "abstract" context without showing the chat itself.
ADOR contradicted itself over "Emotional Oranges"
ADOR argues that it invested money in the "Emotional Oranges" project to prove that Danielle had exclusive artistic activity with them.
Ador refused to admit the filming was interrupted, and the judge answered:
"Stop insisting on something that doesn't match the facts and review your bank records instead."
In essence, he told them that their financial records do not support their claims.
Danielle's defense agreed to an internal review.
When the judge requested verification of the financial records, Danielle's side said they had no objection and would address the matter.
They stated that they have banking documentation to counter ADOR's claims.
It was a bad day for ADOR in court. The judge prohibited no media theatrics and no PowerPoint presentations with chat screenshots.
He also questioned their key argument regarding Emotional Oranges, because they were unable to show that the filming continued.
If ADOR cannot prove through bank records that there was a genuine investment, its claim of "violated exclusive activity" becomes weaker‼️
