I was listening to McGear today, and I need to hear all of your opinions, theories, and head canons about Norton
Oh, that's an excellent question!
As usual, I tried to keep it short, and as usual, I failed, so: the rest (a lot of it) is under the cut.
First of all, for some context: McGear is Mike McCartney's second solo album. It was recorded during the first months of 1974.
Basking in the success of Band on the Run, Paul wanted to gather & rehearse a new constellation of Wings. Mike was looking to revive his musical career. And so it happened that Paul co-wrote and produced McGear and became part of his brother's backing band.
With the perceptiveness they're sometimes capable of, Kozinn & Sinclair (in The McCartney Legacy 2) compare the arrangement to the Beatles getting their start by backing Tony Sheridan: Instead of the front man, Paul was one of the gang, the bass man. For the first time in years, the pressure was off.
Now for Norton. This is one of the first songs they recorded for McGear, and, as Sinkozinn point out, it bears Mike's signature more than Paul's: it's "spoken rather than sung" in a fake posh accent, and includes a brief sketch performed by Mike, Paul, and Denny.
Here are the lyrics:
Norton is a mummy's boy, Norton's very clever Norton's very good at sport in the nicer weather
Norton is a pretty boy, Norton is a sissy Norton's got a lovely girl, now isn't that a pity?
Norton is a daddy's boy, Norton joined the Army He thought they'd make a man of him--he must be bloody barmy!
Truck on!
22431333, Private Norton reporting for duty, sir! A-jolly good, Norton, recommend a commission, Sergeant! Sir! About turn! Left, right, left, right Left, right, left, right...
Norton's still a pansy boy, Norton's still a pet And if he gave me half a chance, I'd wring his bleedin' neck!
I love you, Norton Right on!
Kozinnclair offer that the song is "pitched (<- ?) as a satire on the androgyny at the heart of the glam movement [...] more in Scaffolds bailiwick than Paul's [...]."
(Paul Aug. 22, 1966 voice:) Oh. Do you believe that? Do you?
I don't.
I mean, sure, I briefly entertained the possibility that Paul, Mike and Denny were making fun of effeminate boys in the army as part of some kind of we are all so normal and grown-up and straight now game of make-believe. But it didn't make sense to me, and now I'll explain why.
⢠The song doesn't make fun of Norton, it makes fun of the people who mock himâtheir nasty tone, the underlying jealousy (Norton's got a lovely girl!), the obsession with being good at "sports."
⢠Knowing Paul's special fondness for men who were made men of in the army, the second verse sounds more knowing and a little darker than the first: Norton was a fool for thinking he could be changed. But also:
⢠calling everyone who thinks he's so tough for joining the armyâare you sure you're not just a daddy's boy? Enjoying the presence of men in uniform? An idle thought experiment about no one in particular (typical of McCartney) except, perhaps, inspired by Brian.
⢠then the un-funny sketch, possibly re-enacting many a playground bullying, and a very weird final verse:
⢠Norton will not change, and he refuses to die. He does not even give you half a chance to wring his bloody neck, so keep ranting, posh asshole/representative of the straight establishment.
⢠I love you Norton! (Wings harmonies: right ooonnnnnnn!) So, I guess that was my headcanon. Mocking the mockers.
I also have two tinhats about the song. One is very probably not viable, and the other is, I don't know.
Tinhat nr. 1: During the work on McGear, Paul and his family were staying with Jim, Angie and Ruth McCartney. Every day, Paul and Linda spent hours in the car with Mike, driving to Strawberry Studios in Stockton. Could the speaker of Norton be...Jim McCartney? Is this about the brothers remembering their father's sermons about proper manly behavior? Reasons in favor: Jim was old-fashioned, did not tolerate that Lennon alone in the house with Paul, had strong teen pregnancy>>gay eyebrows views. Also, Paul had tension with Jim at the time, and his "Northern Men don't touch each other, they cut the turkey" theories must have originated somewhere. (Lee Eastman, though?) Reasons against: Mike remembers Jim as someone who was a secret raver, lover of music, unconventional in his own way. Also, Jim wasn't posh. Hm. Tinhat nr. 2: Koclair redeem themselves for their "glam rock satire"âflop by pointing out that Norton is inspired by Napoleon XIV's (Jerry Samuels) They're Coming to Take Me Away, Ha-Haa!, "a 1966 American novelty record, the title of which is scribbled across the top of Mike's handwritten lyrics sheet."
The musical similarities between the two numbers are obvious (listen to They're Coming... and to Norton, both on youtube). Lyrically, it gets interesting: They're Coming to Take Me Away, Ha-Haa is a rant by a mental patient who has been dumped by his lover.
If you can step away from hearing They're Coming as making fun of mental illness, and instead listen to it as a parody of someone insisting he's just fine, totally mad but just fine after a break-up â which, similar to hearing Norton as a satire of the mockers rather than an attack of Norton himself, I do â you'll find parallels to a situation that has unfolded not very long ago in the life of one of the people in the studio. The speaker goes in hard, spitting blame and sarcasm at his ex:
Remember when you ran away And I got on my knees and begged you Not to leave because I´d go beserk? WELL,
You left me anyhow and Then the days got worse and worse And now you see I´ve gone completely out of my mind
He then declares with fiery mania that he is being taken away "to the funny farm" (I know the expression, but come onnn, farm), where "life is beautiful all the time, and I'll be happy to see these nice young men in their white clean coats."
He continues:
"You thought it was a joke, and so you LAUGHED, YOU LAUGHED! When I had said that losing you Would make me flip my lid,
RIGHT?
You know you laughed. I HEARD you laugh, you laughed And laughed and laughed And then you left, But now you know I´m utterly mad"
Oh! Darling, anyone?
The song continues: "I cooked your food, I cleaned your house, And this is how you pay me back For all my kind unselfish loving deeds
HUH?"
Steaks and spuds! And an apron! All for you! But just you wait:
"Well, you just wait, They´ll find you yet, And when they do, they´ll put you in the ASPCA, you mangy MUTT"
(full lyrics here)
Hmm.
Now, did Mike simply enjoy the Napoleon XIV song and use it as inspiration? OR did he listen to one or more Paul-monologues about quote unquote recent events, and did this bring the song back to his memory?
I really couldn't say. But, you know. *adjusts tinhat nr. 2, come hither pose*
(Only a few weeks after recording Norton, Paul learned of yet another Lennon-issued roadblock to the Beatles divorce and, "livid," abandoned Linda and their children for a breakfast ranting session with Jim at Rembrandt.)


















