How can we see the cultural work of filk being taken up and transformed in the arguably more professionalized Wizard Rock of the Harry Potter fandom, or in the proliferation of amateur musicians on MySpace and, more recently, SoundCloud?
Filk, expressions of the ideals and sentiments of a fandom through folk music, is a marginal cog in the fan machine. Often ignored by larger fandom until the late 1970’s, filking is becoming a more common practice in the current fandom landscape, especially as updated technology and the internet has made access to filk and the creation of it that much easier. Filk is also a gender-neutral fan activity; it does not tend to lean towards one gender more than the other, making it a very accessible practice for many. In the words of Henry Jenkins, filk is “at once a personal expression of one fan’s response to the film and a statement of generally shared sentiments and experiences within fandom” (Jenkins 250.) Filk is a communal fan experience, a sub-community within the fan community, and embraces a number of different fandoms. It allows for a multitude of interests to be explored and creates a bond of commonality among diverse interests.
Filking also offers fans the chance to speak from a number of different points of view, often marginalized characters in their chosen fandom, and give them a voice. It also allows them to engage with unexplored aspects of the primary text and create a discourse on these themes through song. Filk is also derived from (usually) already popularized songs or folk music, building new culture on a previously existing foundation. This also ensures participation from many filkers: “Filk songs may evoke the negative stereotypes of fans circulated by the mass media or by cultural critics, yet inflict them in directions more sympathetic to the community’s own interests” (Jenkins 260.) A central feature of filking is the ‘song circle’; one fan begins a song and others join in and at its end, a new song begins in response. This folklore, or filklore, of sorts allows a fandom to express thoughts on their behalf and share their ideals and interests and “define its relationship to the outside world” (Jenkins 273.)
Updated audio technology and wide internet access is making the creation and sharing of filk easy, but eliminates some of the close bonds of a filksong. Websites like SoundCloud allow for anyone willing to create their own song and share it immediately with friends or strangers via websites like MySpace; both sites have become a hub for amateur musicians, filkers or otherwise. In a way, this is filk being taken up and expanded in a way unlike before. Wizard Rock from the Harry Potter fandom is classic filk taken up a few notches. Many ‘wrock’ bands record their songs, usually from the point of view of a Harry Potter character or about the series, and release them via YouTube or MySpace. The songs are then shared across the fandom; unlike most filk, however, these songs are not set to the tune of other songs and are their own incarnations. Diehard filkers believe this trend is damaging to the concept of filk: “[it] has become more hierarchical due to the push toward professional standards of technical perfection” (Jenkins 275.) The culture of wizard rock and websites like SoundCloud and MySpace have taken filk into the mainstream much more and provided more access than ever before but have also disturbed the democratic ideals filk was built upon.
Jenkins, Henry. “”Strangers No More, We Sing”: Filk Music, Folk Culture, and the Fan Community.” Textual Poachers: Television Fans; Participatory Culture. Twentieth Anniversary ed. New York: Routledge, 2013. 250-77. Print.