#judicial integrity

Crazy that Rudy Giuliani was ordered to pay $140 million for saying a rigged election was rigged.

Meanwhile, not a single Democrat or corporate journalist has paid anything for pushing the Russia collusion hoax for over four years.

Let that sink in.

Giuliani gets crushed for voicing what tens of millions of Americans believe. He questioned an election and they’re trying to bankrupt him into silence. But the people who knowingly spread the biggest political lie of the century? They’re still on TV, still in office, still cashing checks.

They told us every day that Trump was a Russian asset.

They told us there was proof.

They told us democracy was under attack.

They lied.

They used fake dossiers, corrupt officials, and complicit media to launch an investigation that cost this country $40 million and tore the nation apart. They knew it was false. They did it anyway.

And they walked away without a scratch.

If there’s anyone who should be dragged into court, it’s the people who pushed the Trump-Russia hoax. Starting with Adam Schiff.

Adam Schiff looked the American people in the eye and said he had evidence. He said it was clear. He went on every network that would have him and repeated the lie again and again. He even read a fake transcript into the congressional record to fan the flames.

He never produced the evidence. Because it never existed.

When the truth came out, he didn’t apologize. He didn’t admit he was wrong. He raised money and ran for Senate.

This is not justice. It is a two-tiered system where speaking the truth gets you punished and lying for the regime gets you promoted.

It is time to change that.

If Rudy Giuliani owes $140 million for “disinformation,” then Adam Schiff owes the American people the full cost of the Mueller investigation, along with every ounce of trust he helped destroy.

He should not be sitting in Congress. He should be sitting in court.

No more free passes. No more protected lies.

Hold them accountable.

LAWFARE: Judge Boasberg—the activist judge actively obstructing Trump’s agenda—has a daughter whose NGO offers legal aid to illegal immigrants, including members of MS-13 and the TdA gang. The NGO is indirectly funded by taxpayers through USAID grants.

A controversial policy of destroying recordings of trials after seven years is to be abandoned, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has disclosed. The policy, affecting courts in England and Wales, had been heavily criticised by lawyers and miscarriage of justice campaigners, who said the destruction of court records makes challenging a conviction almost impossible. They point to cases like Omar Benguit – now the subject of a BBC Panorama investigation – where vital court records were erased. Benguit’s legal team claim the transcripts from his three trials would have provided invaluable evidence for an appeal – but all were destroyed before they could be examined. As a journalism lecturer carrying out research into court reporting, as well as miscarriages of justice, I was keen to investigate, and requested more information from the MoJ through Freedom of Information requests. In its responses to me, the MoJ publicly disclosed for the first time that trial records will now be kept for at least as long as the prison sentence – and possibly indefinitely. An MoJ spokesperson said: “This updated policy safeguards continued access to court records for the purpose of appeals, reviews or any other legal proceedings that may arise during the entire period of the sentence. "Retaining records for the full length of the sentence preserves judicial integrity, and protects the rights of all parties concerned.”