#jonathan djanogly

Circles of our health - lets end this distortion in our political life which appears to be affecting health chances

The decision by David Cameron and his advisers to exclude the NHS from his top 6 priorities as announced on Monday was yet another indication of how important health is to our election, albeit as a consequence of its absence. This comes hot on the heels of the disastrous news from Hinchingbrooke at the end of the previous week. Whatever the reason for the policy gap when compared to 5 years ago…

[caption id="" align="alignright" width="240" caption="Image via Wikipedia"][/caption]

JUSTICE UNDER THREAT

With much of our law now ‘Made In Europe’, and complicated, being able to challenge perverse legislation is a must. In 2009-10, the Conservatives opposed Labour’s plans to try to restrict those found innocent in reclaiming ‘reasonable legal costs’. Now the Coalition is to revive them, for a saving of £40m a year – maybe other EU countries need it more...? newalliance.org.uk Innocent people will be forced to pay thousands of pounds for their own defence lawyers after a controversial coalition U-turn on legal aid. The move, which lawyers' organisations claim puts a price on justice, comes at a time of mounting concern over cutbacks proposed by the Ministry of Justice. Clause 52 in the legal aid and sentencing bill removes the right of defendants to have the "reasonable" costs of hiring their own lawyer reimbursed if they are found innocent. The plan was first drawn up by the previous Labour government, but was scrapped in the face of Tory opposition. The attorney general, Dominic Grieve, the solicitor general, Edward Garnier, and justice ministers Jonathan Djanogly and Crispin Blunt all opposed the plan, and signed an early day motion against it in October 2009. But their decision now to back a similar proposal has alarmed justice groups. which have branded it a U-turn. "We are deeply disappointed that this government is trying to bring this back," said Robert Khan, head of law reform at the Law Society. "It is wrong in principle that the acquitted person should then have to pay the costs of their defence for the temerity of proving their own innocence." Ministers expect to save £40m under the proposals. More than one million defendants who appeared before magistrates courts in 2008 did not receive legal aid, meaning the estimated tens of thousands subsequently found innocent would have lost out financially. more @ The Observer

Related articles

Record high for prison population (independent.co.uk)

David Cameron's barrister brother Alex in legal aid earnings row (mirror.co.uk)

Expenses judge slams party chiefs (bbc.co.uk)

16,000 police to take to streets as Parliament is recalled (independent.co.uk)

Home owners to use reasonable force legally against burglars (money.marksandspencer.com)

London riots: Prime Minister's statement in full (telegraph.co.uk)

David Cameron's full statement on the UK riots (guardian.co.uk)

Clarke's sentencing plans attacked (mirror.co.uk)

Conservative party unease grows as young rebel MPs take on coalition (guardian.co.uk)

ICO won't investigate Tory minister (go.theregister.com)

How MPs are making an illegal U-turn on protection for innocent motorists (blogs.confused.com)

One in three law centres will fall victim to public spending cuts (independent.co.uk)

Legal Aid Cuts (socyberty.com)