I was asked to address a number in the current film we are reviewing as a group and throw in a bit of a trigger warning. Let me start with
SLIGHT SPOILERS FOR SWING TIME (1936)!!!!
There is a tap dance number in our current film in which Fred Astaire puts on black face. It does not ruin the movie for me personally, but I realize it is a bit awkward and might upset some people. I watch the movies from the AFI list as a bit of a history lesson and I find it fascinating that this would be an acceptable choice to include in a major motion picture. I have no right to decree whether it is or is not offensive so instead I did some research on why it is in the movie and what the intent was:
1) Fred Astaire says he created the steps to credit the style of his former tap instructor, Jon Bubbles. The clothes mimic the character of Sportin’ Life from the Gershwin production of Porgy and Bess, played by Jon Bubbles. Astaire says the black face was a throwback to the Vaudevillian practice of face painting when attempting to portray a black character. He specifically did not include an overemphasis of the lips to avoid harkening back to the infamous Sambo character, which is a stereotyped depiction of Black Africans.Â
2) The number is entitled “Bojangles in Harlem” as a tribute to Bill “Bojangles” Robinson who Astaire credits as an influence on his career. Robinson was the first black man to hold the hand of a white actress on screen in American cinema when he danced with little Shirley Temple. He was the highest paid and most recognized black actor in Hollywood for the first half of the 20th century. Robinson also was famous for his time in and his progression from the minstrel shows from the turn of the century that were known for incorporating black face.
3) John Bubbles had a routine called “Me and My Shadow” in which he was lit from many angles. Astaire immitated this with a twist of having basically a dance off with his shadows that were projected up behind him.Â
In hindsight, the black face was probably not necessary and it would definitely not fly today. I see the logic behind the choice and the intentions seem to be good, but that does not mean it does not come across offensive to some people. It is an amazing number as far as cinematography and technical skill. The routine was well choreographed and earned Hermes Pan an Academy Award nomination for Best Dance Direction, but I am not going to say that this makes it okay. I do not believe that results justify the means. As with most media, it is best left up to viewer discretion.Â
As a side note, this was not the weirdest/most offensive tribute ever made to John Bubbles. That award goes to Michael Jackson, who named his pet monkey “Bubbles” after the star. That is just weird.