And there's no physical description of Loki other than "beautiful and comely to look at." Put "Loki is a ginger fire god" away, Wagner.

As to stop making him out to be a fucking villain, there's like 2 mainstream IPs that have him as an antagonist... this is nothing (come back when you have at least half a century of evil characterizations).

There's also this other account that was complaining also in the other post I made.

Sif's a harvest goddess not "just Thor's wife".

Loki can shapeshift without the need of animal skins. I don't remember he got a horse cloak or salmon cloak or fly cloak (among other things like a woman and a giantess). Loki can also shapeshift others (e.g. he turned Idunn into a walnut).

For context, I really HATE Loki TWT (I find Lokiblr more tolerable, maybe because it's easier to avoid shit as I have the algorithm recommendations turned off. Y'all should try that.). Everyone's awful over there, be it anti series, Sylki, or Lokius.

Like do they all know they can express grievances without getting ableist and nasty?

If you complain about Sylvie being "harmful queer rep" BUT want "Lady Loki" in the MCU, which was Loki possessing Sif's body just to torment Sif, I need you to sit down and shut up. a. Genderfluid people don't go by "Lady " when they're femme or women. b. If you don't see the transphobic dogwhistles in the comics possession subplot, I don't know what to tell you... But let's say that hag that wrote those crappy books would love it. c. If you weren't aware about this, maybe you should read the wiki at least before giving uninformed opinions.

I definitely agree that they should not have led people on with the promise of genderfluid rep during the promotion of the series. But get mad at Disney/Marvel for that. Not at the writers or Sophia Di Martino that had to cave in to Feige's demands. That's literally what they have to do.

I really don't give a damn about the "autogynephilia" allegations, which again, is ALSO PRESENT IN CIS WOMEN. Like why the fuck should I care about someone finding themselves hot? There's fascists out there. AGP even if it was a trans-specific thing harms no one. The only harm said to come from it is DUE TO FASCISM because it plays into RESPECTABILITY POLITICS.

If you use AI to create a "proper" Lady Loki or love interest for Loki, you can't complain about the blatant product placement in S2. I am not a fan of product placement either and won't defend it, but those are the rules. Show some integrity. And before you ask, I have not given a cent to Disney since they pissed me off with attempts to trademark Dia de los Muertos for Coco.

If you complain about how being a "Loki" is not a role (unlike Spiderman) and how it should have been all 100% Tom Hiddleston, you don't get to call it selfcest as a gotcha, because you're already differentiating between the variants with different DNA. Like do y'all hate selfcest or not? Make up your mind. The series treats a Loki as an archetype of sorts, so it can be a role. Also, having the same name does not make you related because we don't know what Sylvie's parents are? And we don't even know if Sylvie is also a Jotun, a prop claims she isn't.

If you say you want Sylvie dead but claim to not be misogynistic, because you'd love if a specific love interest from the comics or mythology replaced her, STFU. You only like those because you can project whatever the fuck you want onto them.

If you claim Sylvie is a misogynistic depiction of women but salivate over characters written by cishet white men in the 1960s-1980s that made wanting to fuck Thor or being in a monogamous marriage with Loki their entire personality (there's so MANY OF THESE), STFU. Do you hear yourself? And no, it's not misogynistic of me, a woman, to criticize offensive depictions of women by cishet white men. They're not real.

Our MCU!Loki is not the young adult Ikol reincarnation currently. Of course 20-something Verity is not going to be there! The Loki show should be praise for having multiple female cast members around the same age as the protagonist and pragmatic clothing choices that allowed SdM to nurse her baby.

Selfcest isn't real and I cry tears of boredom whenever someone clutches their pearls over it.

The comics aren't perfect. As much as I loved the recent Dan Watters run (and German Peralta's art), the comics art has some very questionable tendencies, especially regarding Loki's nose when she's femme. It's associated with how some kinds of facial features are considered masculine or feminine (and racialized). Noses have no gender, ffs! Women with nose bumps exist! For some reason Loki always has a tiny button nose when she's a woman or femme. There's also the BLATANT physiognomy that has ALWAYS PLAGUED Thor comics since their inception, and Loki's facial features as they've become more "grey" and less evil is an interesting study. Peralta's far from being the only artist with this problem, and is far from being the most problematic. For comparison from Loki (2023) run:

Loki from ye olden days:

Joking about Femicide isn't Cute

If I see another "joke" about how Sylvie should get killed by Loki or Mobius so they can get with Mobius or whatever, I will go apeshit. I am from a country that has a VERY HIGH femicide rate, joking about this isn't funny. And as someone that grew up surrounded by news of constant graphic and hyper-violent news of women's deaths, it's a bit triggering. Hell, I even find fridging in comics a bit triggering and try to avoid it, and it's the trope I loathe most. You are myopic, disgusting, and privileged to consider this funny.

On "Larry"

I need you all to tone down the borderline ableist comments when talking about how Loki is now a "foolish" character named "Larry" and that you want "Larry" dead so the "real" Loki can come back. Or that the Loki from the movies would kill "Larry." Loki or "Larry" as you all like to refer to, shows some pretty overt ND traits in the series. In the movies, they're more ambiguous and more "masked" and thus more palatable (Loki also has less screentime). In Thor 1, I'd have considered Loki "ND-coded (especially in my heart, always) but not explicitly so", whereas in the series, it's more in your face (not confirmed by Word-of-God, but I do similar shit and went like "He's just like me!").

I think it's fine to say that you think the characterization was inconsistent with those from the movies and to not like the writing of the series, but tone it down with the insults. How do you think it looks like when people say a character that acts a bit like you is now "foolish" or "stupid" and that you'd rather Larry be dead because he's overtly expressive and "exaggerated"...

Subjecting Loki and Sylvie to the Aloy Treatment "from fans"

So, I didn't want to say it on my post about how people are too harsh on Loki and Sylvie's wardrobes on the series and are putting more importance on aesthetics rather than storytelling, but you all are sounding like the "fans" that redesigned Aloy, from a post-apocalyptic setting, with a full face of makeup. I find it interesting it's a primarily male-presenting queer character also getting this treatment. Here's my post:

Imagine tagging Neil Gaiman, whom you constantly complain about because he doesn't depict Loki the way you wish, to confirm some half-assed theory (by that salty Tumblr user I know suibaited me at least once on anon).

I know you're referring to this frame:

Sandman spoilers!!!