#integretave practice

I’ve noticed that I'm doing most of my physical projects and research on the objects side of things. Our finalised disciplinary is the Cross-Disciplinary or approach which is linking two or more fields of study (looking at the outcome from two different perspectives). Out of all the roles in the the qroup, qualitative has given me a greater understanding in terms of qualities, emotion and the relief after death. I still don't know what the outset behind this project will be, but i can’t help feel like incorporating the kintsugi method into place, then explaining the thoughts behind this process to the studio and symbolise the ‘afterlife’, I’ve been getting carried away with my physical approach leading more into a theory approach. I have outlined a brief earlier in the blog for me to stick behind but i feel as though my communication between members is quiet. My final product from the Kintsugi method is too small and will not be sufficient for a final artefact. Will have to talk to the rest of the team about this “out-come”

[ Dillon : Navy ]

The final part of my method to achieving this art, however, it may have been of smaller scale due to size and materials of the project. Before i started this project i feared death in my own way, but researching into William Bryant Cullens poetry i was able to find reassurance and natural orders in his poetic style. The re assurance that death is a cycle has changed my views completely.