Or they always planned big for her, but were limited by the 2000s™️?

Either way I'm so happy with what we have today, one of the best designed characters in the world. ♥️

Did you ask this before?

I’d argue that Diana was well developed by Blood Money, rather than being saved by the trilogy. She’s been described by Michael Vogt as being the main character for a long time.

Plus, I really loved the original idea of Diana and 47 being from opposite sides of the world of assassination.

But...

In light of how Diana and 47 are bound to each other, I kinda love it now.

Diana has always been the one in control of 47, and H3 really spells that out. She has used him, abused him, and he's always come back for more. Really, she owes him kindness. She owes him freedom.

But, now that the story made it so 47 killed her parents, 47 owes her too. In fact, everything Diana has done, everything she has ever done to 47, has been because of a single order he followed in 1989. His actions drove her into this life.

Diana was also specified in the contract as acceptable collateral damage, but 47 chose to keep it clean and only kill the adult Burnwoods. He chose to orphan her rather than kill her, and in the strangest way, he is responsible for who she is now.

I’d love to know more of the context for this question because a) Diana and 47 frequently explain this, and b) your question makes it sound like you think the ICA was the only reason they worked in assassination. 

Both Diana and 47 lived lives of crime before joining the ICA. The ICA simply provided the infrastructure they needed. 

Hitman 2016 for game Diana, except for the terrible hair 😂 Although the annoucement trailer Diana for Hitman 3 was the best Diana overall.

That’s a big question, can you be a little more specific?