thanks for running your blog, I think you're doing a great job!
I resonate with hetgnc, and initially thought virago could become a useful term for me personally...
but I am not attracted to intrafem/Mollis men, so I am feeling a little out of place again. (please picture the "happy for you" kid meme)
have you found in your journeys a term or community for intramasc women who are attracted to intramasc men?
cheers
Aww, thank you so much for the kind note about the blog!! About your questionā a few things!
Firstā HetGNC is a broader label, so anyone whose identity is significantly GNC in a āheteroā (M/F) context is included with it! You donāt have to be either virago or mollis to be HetGNC, those are just two specific identities that fit under the HetGNC umbrella as well. So youāre totally good to keep using HetGNC for yourself!
Secondā The definitions for virago and mollis are actually a little looser than that!
Virago is a label for women attracted to men, and also are: masculine, OR dominant (sexual OR nonsexual), OR attracted to feminine men⦠itās most common for viragos to be all three, but not required!
Mollis are men attracted to women, and also are: feminine, OR submissive (sexual or nonsexual), OR attracted to masculine women⦠itās most common for mollis to be all three, but not required!
Also, there are many ways the words āmasculine,ā ādominantā/āsubmissiveā, and āfeminineā can be defined, and itās left to be subjective like that on purpose.
So, just like how there are feminine (including intrafem) viragos, there are also masculine (including intramasc) mollis!
Thirdā You absolutely do not HAVE to use the virago label for yourself if you donāt feel like it resonates with you / is useful to you. Itās entirely possible that you ātechnically fit the definitionā but maybe donāt relate to other viragos enough for it to make sense to you to use the label. The label is intended as a tool, not a box!
HOWEVER, being attracted to intramasc men (or even masc men in general) doesnāt disqualify you! You ācountā already, on the basis of being a masculine woman attracted to men. (In fact, I think that could be an interesting perspective to explore if you ever feel like posting about it! Most of the conversations in the community are currently about masc x fem, but thatās not all thatās allowed! I encourage everyone to create the content they want to see!)
Lastlyā PLEASE go check out the definition/info pages I have on my blog for virago and mollis for an explanation of the definition and what the labels are intended to be for! Itāll help you understand how and why masc mollis and mascxmasc viragos exist.
Hopefully that helps! Iām here if you have any more questions!












