seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Netherlands
seen from Netherlands
seen from South Africa
seen from Russia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
"In the end, landing a man on Mars may prove easier for Musk than expunging corruption and fraud from the federal government. Who would have thought?!…"
READ & LISTEN NOW: https://www.undergroundusa.com/p/no-doge-is-not-unconstitutional
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
"It's quite simple, Senator: if you're more upset at the whistleblower than you are at the lawbreaking they revealed, you're not in a position to be questioning anybody's judgment."
Edward Joseph Snowden is an American-Russian former NSA intelligence contractor and whistleblower who leaked classified documents revealing the existence of global surveillance programs.
Whistleblower on Mass Surveillance – Edward Snowden, a former NSA contractor, leaked classified information in 2013, exposing global surveillance programs operated by the U.S. government in collaboration with international allies.
Former Intelligence Operative – Before becoming a whistleblower, Snowden worked for the CIA and later as a contractor for the NSA, where he gained access to classified materials.
Asylum in Russia – After leaking the documents, Snowden fled to Hong Kong and later sought asylum in Russia, where he has lived since 2013. He was granted permanent residency and eventually Russian citizenship in 2022.
Public Debate on Privacy and Security – Snowden’s revelations sparked widespread debate on government surveillance, privacy rights, and national security, leading to some reforms in intelligence practices, particularly the USA FREEDOM Act of 2015.
Author and Speaker – He wrote a memoir, Permanent Record (2019), detailing his experiences and views on privacy and government overreach. He also continues to advocate for digital privacy and government transparency.
An open letter to the U.S. Congress
Pass a bill to make Trump’s trial viewable by ALL Americans!
1,333 so far! Help us get to 2,000 signers!
I understand that the Senate just passed a bill, S. 3250, to permit victims of crimes associated with the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 to access court proceedings in the criminal case against the perpetrators. This new law will mean that affected people who are too old or infirm to travel to Washington, D.C., or those who are too far away to readily make the trip will still be able to observe court proceedings. Prosecutors at the Justice Department supported the move because they thought it was important for people affected by the crime to see justice in action. They are correct. Bearing this precedent in mind, I would like Congress to swiftly pass a similar bill for Trump’s prosecution for interference in the 2020 election. This case, United States v. Donald J. Trump, is of even more singular importance than the Lockerbie case. If such access can be offered for those victims it can be offered to the American people for a trial in which they have a distinct and unparalleled interest. This is one of the most important court cases this country will ever see. It is in the best interests of every US citizen to provide full access to it. There are, furthermore, no compelling reasons not to do so. Please introduce and/or support such a bill right away. People will be able to learn more about the arguments being made and it is more difficult to pass off disinformation about a proceeding that the public has full access to. Thanks.
▶ Created on January 22 by Jess Craven
📱 Text SIGN PIYDKC to 50409
🤯 Liked it? Text FOLLOW JESSCRAVEN101 to 50409
Text SIGN PIYDKC to 50409 to send this to your officials.
Navy Photo Restrictions Spark Transparency Debate ⚓
The U.S. Navy is facing attention over restrictions involving leadership photographs on official websites. The discussion has opened a wider conversation about military communication, public access, and accountability.
Supporters believe the Navy needs clear rules to protect its image and maintain professional standards. Others argue that limiting access to official information could make it harder for the public to stay informed about military leadership.
As digital platforms become more important for government communication, the challenge remains the same: finding the right balance between control, security, and transparency.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Global energy crisis: Government prioritises balanced approach to conveying information – Saifuddin http://dlvr.it/TS0z31
Trump administration defends partial Epstein files release as Democrats accuse DOJ of cover-up and excessive redactions.
Trump administration defends partial #Epsteinfiles release as Democrats accuse #DOJ of cover-up and excessive redactions.
Jeffrey Epstein Files Released: Incomplete DOJ Document Dump
Jeffrey Epstein Files Released: DOJ Delivers Partial Document Dump Amid Controversy
The Department of Justice released thousands of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein on December 19, 2025, meeting a congressional deadline but falling short of full transparency requirements. The partial release has sparked immediate criticism from lawmakers and victim advocates who demanded complete disclosure.
#Jeffrey Epstein Files Released
What the Epstein Files Contain
The released documents include previously unseen photographs, court records, FBI investigation files, and evidence from multiple criminal probes spanning nearly two decades. Among the materials disclosed are images of former President Bill Clinton, including one showing him in a hot tub with an unidentified person whose face was redacted.
The files also feature photographs showing Clinton with celebrities including Michael Jackson and Diana Ross, as well as images of Epstein with journalist Walter Cronkite. Additional materials include flight logs from Epstein's private aircraft, contact books, and evidence collected from his estate in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Key Documents in the Release- FBI investigation files from 2006, 2018, and 2019 criminal probes - Evidence from Ghislaine Maxwell's 2019 investigation - Court records from civil and criminal cases - Photographs from Epstein's properties showing potential evidence - Heavily redacted grand jury testimony spanning 119 pages
Missing Files Trigger Political Firestorm
Representative Thomas Massie, who led efforts to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act, declared the partial release "grossly fails to comply with both the spirit and the letter of the law." The legislation required all documents to be released within 30 days of enactment, a deadline that came on December 19.
The DOJ acknowledged to Congress that the release was incomplete and indicated additional document dumps would occur by year's end. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche cited the need to protect Epstein's victims during the vetting process as justification for the phased approach.
Political Reactions Split Along Party Lines
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer accused the Trump administration of orchestrating "a cover up to protect Donald Trump from his ugly past." Representative Ro Khanna threatened potential impeachment hearings for Attorney General Pam Bondi if the documents fail to meet legal requirements.
Clinton spokesperson Angel Ureña pushed back against the focus on decades-old photos, stating the release was designed to shield the current administration rather than expose Clinton connections.
#Jeffrey Epstein Files Released
What's Still Missing from Public View
Attorney Brad Edwards, representing over 200 alleged Epstein victims, highlighted critical absent documents. The 83-page prosecution memo and 60-count draft indictment prepared by federal prosecutor Marie Villafaña in 2007 remain unreleased, despite potential insights into why authorities negotiated a plea deal rather than pursuing full prosecution.
Victim advocates report knowing of at least 20 men accused of sex crimes in FBI possession through FD-302 interview forms. These names have not appeared in the current release.
Timeline of Previous Epstein Document Releases- January 2024: Court documents from Maxwell lawsuit unsealed - September 2025: House Oversight released 33,000 pages including flight records - November 2025: 20,000 records from Epstein's estate disclosed - December 2025: DOJ partial release following congressional mandate
🌸 Hi ladies!
I'm so excited to share that I just launched my new mobile app Mothers&Sisters 💕 — a safe and empowering space created especially for women.
✨ Here's what you can do inside the app:
- • Create your own women's communities (as many as you like!) - • Join existing groups to connect, share, and grow together - • Enjoy familiar social media features designed with women in mind - • Host or join live group calls 📱💬 - • Share your knowledge, skills, or passions — and even earn money by offering paid lessons or sessions 💼🌟
Whether you're looking for support, inspiration, or sisterhood, Mothers&Sisters is all about women uplifting women. 💪👭
👉 Download the app today and be one of the first to try it out:
⚡️ Quick note: When you first sign up, your home screen may look empty at the start — that's normal! Just tap the search icon 🔍, explore, and join a community (we have demo groups ready for you). Let's build this amazing space together. Your feedback means the world to me! 💖
What the Files Don't Show
Despite widespread speculation, the released documents contain no evidence of a "client list" that Epstein allegedly maintained to blackmail associates. The FBI and Justice Department concluded in a memo that no evidence exists supporting claims Epstein blackmailed powerful figures or that he was murdered rather than dying by suicide.
The files show numerous prominent individuals had contact with Epstein, including politicians, scientists, and entertainers. However, most references involve casual social encounters rather than allegations of criminal wrongdoing.
Notable Individuals Mentioned- Former Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump - Scientists including Noam Chomsky and the late Stephen Hawking - Entertainers Michael Jackson and Diana Ross - Former Trump advisers including Steve Bannon - Former Harvard president Larry Summers
Neither Clinton nor Trump face allegations of misconduct in the released materials.
#Jeffrey Epstein Files Released
Survivor Advocates Express Frustration
Lisa Phillips, who says she endured years of abuse from Epstein's network, told CNN the Justice Department appears to be "protecting themselves, not the victims." She emphasized survivors have information that could help connect investigative dots but continue facing bureaucratic obstacles.
The inconsistent redaction approach has added to frustration. Identical content appears redacted in some documents but visible in others, raising questions about the thoroughness of the review process.
What Happens Next
The DOJ promised additional document releases before December 31, 2025. Congressional oversight committees have indicated they will continue pressing for complete transparency, with potential legal action if the administration fails to comply fully.
Victim advocates and lawmakers from both parties have demanded clear timelines for remaining disclosures and explanations for documents withheld beyond what federal law permits.
#Jeffrey Epstein Files Released
The partial release of Jeffrey Epstein files marks a significant but incomplete step toward transparency in one of the most notorious criminal cases in recent American history. While thousands of pages now sit in the public domain, critical gaps remain that prevent a complete understanding of how Epstein operated for decades and why early investigations resulted in minimal consequences. As additional releases continue through year's end, the question remains whether full accountability will emerge or whether redactions and omissions will continue protecting powerful interests over victim justice.
