#gemindia

Want to sell your products or services directly to the Government? 🚀

With Miloy And Company, getting started on the Government e-Marketplace (GeM) is simple, fast, and hassle-free.

We provide complete support—from GeM registration to tender bidding, product listing, and profile management—so you can focus on growing your business while we handle the process.

Whether you're a manufacturer, service provider, or startup, GeM opens the door to huge government opportunities. Don’t miss out!

📈 Start your journey today and scale your business with trusted expert guidance.

👉 Contact Miloy And Company now to get started!

Coal procurement tenders India are meant to discover market prices through competition. The SECL Kusmunda handling and transport tender highlights how an inflated base value can dilute that purpose. The buyer pegged the estimate at Rs 439.08 crore and invited percentage quotes on GeM for a three-year contract. This framing sets the context for analysing cost discovery under Coal procurement tenders India.

Financial bids converged sharply. L1, L2, and L3 were separated by just over one percent. Such clustering indicates bidders priced near the cost floor. Yet the final award went to a bidder quoting Rs 320.09 crore, about Rs 34 crore higher than the lowest offer. In Coal procurement tenders India, awarding to a non-L1 bidder without a visible disqualification note undermines bidder confidence.

Contract conditions follow Coal India norms on paper. Option clauses allow quantity variation, and PBG is fixed at 5 percent. But the details matter. The base value was around 35 percent higher than L1. PBG validity stretched to 39 months. Excess settlement is permitted with documentation but without caps. These features reshape risk transfer, a recurring concern in Coal procurement tenders India.For SECL, higher participation and GST credit reduce immediate fiscal pressure. For contractors, prolonged validity, working capital blockage, and unaddressed escalation risk remain material. The tender illustrates why Coal procurement tenders India must align base estimation, award logic, and disclosure standards. Without clarity, future Coal tenders linked to Coal handling plants may see conservative pricing or reduced participation, weakening genuine competition, Coal Procurement, GeM India, Coal Handling Plants, Tender Analysis.

Coal handling plants are entering a tighter commercial environment after a Rs 254 crore mining services award under the GeM platform. The tender, issued by Coal India Limited and tied to Central Coalfields Limited operations, combines mining, overburden removal, and coal logistics into one long-duration contract. This structure directly influences how Coal handling plants are priced within integrated mining packages.

The GeM service bid follows a percentage-quote model, shifting emphasis away from negotiated unit rates toward baseline definitions and deduction mechanics. For Coal handling plants, this raises the importance of how payable quantities, penalties, and productivity thresholds are enforced over the ten-year term. The award outcome reveals a sharp price gap between the lowest bidder and the rest, suggesting either a unique operational advantage or acceptance of significant margin stress.

From a sector perspective, Coal handling plants are no longer insulated as standalone logistics assets. They are embedded in broader mining performance contracts where delays, equipment downtime, or safety non-compliance can cascade into financial deductions. This award demonstrates how buyers are pushing risk outward while standardising procurement through GeM templates.For professionals following Coal power projects, the signal is clear. Platform-driven tenders are setting new pricing floors that may not reflect traditional risk buffers. Coal handling plants linked to future Coal India packages will need stronger cost control, equipment planning, and contract management discipline. EnergylineIndia.com tracks these shifts closely as they reshape mining-linked logistics economics, Coal Handling, Mining Contracts, GeM India, Coal Sector.

Coal tenders usually compress margins, but the Dudhichua handling and transportation award raises deeper questions about execution risk. In these Coal tenders, the spread between accepted bids spans almost the full value of the owner’s estimate, with no mechanism to test whether prices are executable.

Against an estimated value of Rs 93.3 crore, the L1 stands at Rs 53.9 crore, while several accepted bids reportedly fall to Rs 5.9 crore. The bid text explicitly disconnects the estimate from price reasonableness, meaning extreme pricing is structurally permitted. This explains why the bid field contains radically different interpretations of the same scope.

The scope embeds the contractor at the surface miner face, tying performance to live production and dispatch. Yet there are no stated productivity norms, equipment deployment rules, or tonnage-based service levels. Contractors are left to self-price assumptions on fleet size, manpower, downtime, and buffers. Some bids appear to treat the work as marginal logistics, others as full-risk mining support.

Single-award concentration magnifies consequences. Although a note mentions possible splitting, it is not applied, leaving continuity risk with one contractor. Arbitration and mediation are excluded, escalation is absent, and no performance bank guarantee is required. For analysts following Coal tenders, this structure has implications across Coal market news and Coal procurement tenders India, Coal Handling, Mining Risk, GeM India, Tender Analysis, Coal Sector.

The verified breakdown is available on EnergylineIndia.com.

The Rs 16 crore strategy and application rollout mandate awarded by IREDA marks a telling moment for POWER CONSULTANCY CONTRACTS IN INDIA, particularly those routed through GeM. While the scope is framed as management consulting, the structure of the tender reveals a deeper shift in how advisory risk, pricing, and control are being redistributed.

All four Tier-1 consulting firms cleared the technical stage, signalling that qualification filters were not intended to shape outcomes. Instead, price ranking alone determined the award. In such an environment, POWER CONSULTANCY CONTRACTS IN INDIA cease to be evaluated on transformation logic or delivery architecture and are reduced to a cost-compression exercise.

The winning bid from A.T. Kearney sits far below competing offers, yet the tender does not disclose manpower intensity, acceptance benchmarks, or escalation protections. The onsite requirement further transfers logistical and deployment risk to the consultant, without any compensatory clauses. This asymmetry favours the promoter, who retains wide discretion over milestone acceptance.

For IREDA, the upside is clear: flexibility, audit defensibility, and cost certainty at award stage. For consultants, however, the model rewards firms willing to absorb scope ambiguity and pricing risk in exchange for institutional positioning.The wider implication is structural. As more POWER CONSULTANCY CONTRACTS IN INDIA migrate to GeM, firms may be forced to rethink pricing strategies, cross-subsidisation models, and appetite for PSU transformation work. Price divergence, rather than convergence, may become the norm, Power consultancy contracts in India, GeM consulting awards, PSU strategy tender, renewable finance consulting, government advisory contracts.

🚨 Procurement Alert for Transport Services! Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution invites bids via the GeM Portal.

Visit for more information:  https://gem.gov.in/

Calling out all GeM Sellers