#gap theory

ROUND 1 — Match 145 of 286

Enid Mettle (OK K.O! Let's Be Heroes!)

Identity: Bisexual, explicit Notes: In a relationship with Red Action (a woman), and explicitly referred to as bisexual by Ian Jones-Quartey. Propaganda: N/A

vs. Lady Khun Sam (Gap Theory)

Identity: WLW, explicit Notes: In love with Mon (a woman). Propaganda: 1. "She's funny. "Hot coffee, extra hot" and then after sipping it "oh, hot"" 2. "lady sam is such a good pick for this because she’s not just a popular sapphic character, she’s part of a show that was genuinely a huge deal. GAP is thailand’s first mainstream girls’ love series, and it blew up hard enough to help push GL further into the spotlight after that. it built a massive fanbase, got major awards attention, and helped turn freen and becky into huge stars. and that makes sam feel significant beyond just “i like this character.” she’s from a series that mattered to a lot of sapphic viewers because it was one of those breakthrough moments where a lesbian lead romance wasn’t being tucked away or treated like an afterthought. if you want a character who feels important in lgbt media history as well as just being memorable in her own right, she’s a very solid choice."

ROUND 2 — Match 73 of 143

Lady Khun Sam (Gap Theory)

Identity: WLW, explicit Notes: In love with Mon (a woman). Propaganda: 1. "She's funny. "Hot coffee, extra hot" and then after sipping it "oh, hot"" 2. "lady sam is such a good pick for this because she’s not just a popular sapphic character, she’s part of a show that was genuinely a huge deal. GAP is thailand’s first mainstream girls’ love series, and it blew up hard enough to help push GL further into the spotlight after that. it built a massive fanbase, got major awards attention, and helped turn freen and becky into huge stars. and that makes sam feel significant beyond just “i like this character.” she’s from a series that mattered to a lot of sapphic viewers because it was one of those breakthrough moments where a lesbian lead romance wasn’t being tucked away or treated like an afterthought. if you want a character who feels important in lgbt media history as well as just being memorable in her own right, she’s a very solid choice."

vs. Paige Duplass (The Silt Verses)

Identity: Trans woman, explicit Notes: Her father mentions having paid for her transition. Propaganda: "Isn’t she clever? Isn’t she something? *bursts into tears*"

Some might not like this, so the reaction to this post won’t be “all sunshine and roses”, but this needs to be said, after all, it’s not about feelings, but more importantly about God’s character and His words on the pages of  the Bible. One Grace teacher I admit, I never gravitated towards was Les Feldick, because I found his teachings akin to “semi-nutritional” baby formula, as they have no…

Dr. Bill Barrick—Professor Emeritus of Old Testament and Hebrew at The Master’s Seminary—joins me to unpack what the Hebrew text of Genesis 1 really says.

Does the Bible itself teach a young earth? Is the day-age theory compatible with the Hebrew grammar? What about the Gap Theory, mytho-history, and functional creation views made popular by scholars like William Lane Craig, Michael Heiser, and John Walton?

33) Le teorie scientifiche inventate da massoni accettate dalle ADI

L’ombra della massoneria sulle Assemblee di Dio in Italia (ADI): 33) Le teorie scientifiche inventate da massoni accettate dalle ADI 1. La Gap-theory (o Teoria Restituzionista) 2. La teoria dei miliardi di anni della terra Come ho detto in precedenza, Ernesto Nathan (1845-1921), Ebreo di origine inglese primo sindaco di Roma, che fu Gran Maestro del Grande Oriente d’Italia (lo fu dal 1896 al…

  By Donald Whitchard Genesis 1:1-2,Genesis 1:31,Genesis 2:1-3,Psalm 33:6,Isaiah 45:12,Acts 17:24   Summary: There are four “theories” used by some believers to explain our origins apart from the biblical account of creation.  We looked at “theistic evolution.”  Now we will look at the “Gap Theory.” Is it a legitimate alternative?  We need to examine its claims.   Four basic creation “theories”…

Another question from a friend. This time it was, why are there multiple creations of day?

I was asked the question,

“In Genesis chapter one, day and night are separated twice; On day one and again on day four.”

What was the purpose of this?

Why was it separated twice?

On day one, we see this.

Then God said, “Let there be light”; and there was light. God saw that the light was good, and God separated the light from the darkness. God called the light day, and…