#fighterpay

UFC President Dana White has pushed back against calls for full transparency in fighter pay, saying that revealing exactly what fighters make would make their lives “a lot tougher.” While UFC recently inked a massive $7.7 billion media rights deal, discussions around how fighters will benefit continue to stir debate. White says incentives and bonuses will increase, but he maintains the company won’t be disclosing all pay details publicly.

Where Things Stand with Fighter Pay and Transparency

Dana White argues that there is no “gag order” keeping fighters from sharing what they make — the implication being that many simply don’t want that information public. The UFC boss claims that revealing exact pay could lead to pressure, negative perceptions, and expectations from people outside the sport. While transparency advocates see this as accountability, White frames it as a protection of fighters’ well-being and privacy.

With the UFC’s new broadcasting deal with Paramount set to begin in 2026, many assumed that this windfall would also bring more openness in how pay is managed. White confirmed that bonuses — including post-fight performance bonuses — will go up under the new deal. Yet, when asked for specifics about base pay, revenue share, or how that media rights income factors into athlete compensation, the answers so far remain vague.

The Financial Reality for Fighters

Under current pay structures, many UFC fighters receive relatively modest guaranteed purses, especially in early or mid-career. The minimum purse for a newcomer is reportedly around $12,000 to show and $12,000 to win, though many fighters have earnings far above that depending on experience, popularity, and fight card placements.

Meanwhile, bonuses like Fight of the Night or Performance of the Night are fixed (historically $50,000), though White says those amounts will increase. Inflation and rising costs for training, travel, coaching, and medical expenses all eat into what fighters can take home after a fight. These ancillary costs are often under-appreciated in public debates.

Why White Believes Full Pay Disclosure Isn’t Ideal

White has argued that public disclosure of fighter pay could bring unwanted scrutiny and pressure. He suggests that some fighters prefer to keep details private, in part to avoid being hassled for portions of their earnings. He also frames incentives as more important than simply raising base salaries — that drivers like performance bonuses or media exposure push athletes to excel.

Another complication is that under the new Paramount deal, the old pay-per-view model in the U.S. is changing. Moves like this shift what transparency might look like, especially with revenue streams that previously tied fighter pay to PPV sales. As the structure changes, so too do the questions about how much fighters will receive from new revenue flows.

What Fans, Fighters, and Critics Are Saying

There’s growing frustration among fighters and fans who argue that UFC’s revenue share for fighters lags behind other major sports leagues. Some estimates put the percentage of revenue that goes to fighters in the 16–20% range, which is far lower than what players in leagues like the NFL or NBA receive.

Critics also point out that while bonuses might be increasing, they don’t always make up for the relatively low guaranteed base pay, especially when fixed costs are deducted. For many fighters, going into a fight still entails personal financial risk.

On the other hand, UFC leadership contends that spectacular fights, high performance, or name recognition can yield significant earnings. White often cites veterans who have fought long careers as examples of those who have been rewarded through exposure and putting in consistent work.

What to Watch Moving Forward

The transition to the Paramount deal in 2026 will be a crucial moment for how monetary incentives are structured. Changes to revenue streams, how much of the broadcast deal filters down to fighters (especially outside the top tier), and whether bonus structures become more transparent are all areas to monitor.

Also, if fighters themselves begin publicly sharing their pay details, that could create momentum for more transparency. Increased media scrutiny and contractual reforms are likely to follow.

Policy changes or collective bargaining could force shifts in what's disclosed, how much fighters earn, and what obligations they have — especially with changing media landscapes and how fans access events.

Fighter pay in the UFC remains complex — between base purses, bonuses, media deals, and behind-the-scenes arrangements. Dana White’s stance is firm on some aspects of privacy and incentive structure, but with the UFC’s financial growth, the pressure to more clearly share how revenue is distributed to fighters is only likely to intensify.