#exploding watermelon

Hey guys, this is my first drawing in 3 1/2 weeks not including that OC Template I did yesterday, I am terribly sorry about that, I went through some pretty bad artist block and couldn't figure out what to draw, which is why this took so long. But this is what I was able to get during these 3 weeks.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Anyways, these drawings are mostly based on Part 3(and one Part 4), and it goes clockwise:

When Molten Salt hits a Watermelon

In present video we’re finding out what goes on when molten salt plus fruit come head to head! Vender: Things get messy!

Sign up & “Ring the Bellâ€?

Get TKOR Merch:

Observe What Else I’m As much as:

Instagram:   Facebook:   Pinterest:  

Business Queries: For sponsorship requests or even business opportunities please contact me personally directly:

Music by: Anders Bothén – “Rock Teddy 04”

Kevin Draper wrote a brilliant analysis on Internet Video views in Gawker that really puts things in perspective.

“100% bullshit,” is what he called Internet Video View metrics.

I'm not sure I agree that the numbers are BS.  I do, however, agree that the way people use the number is.  People hear big numbers of digital viewing and compare it to TV viewing in an illogical way since the measurements are completely different.  They, therefore, draw incorrect conclusions. Here’s the logic behind the statement Kevin made:  we see these gaudy numbers about video views – like the BuzzFeed exploding watermelon.  At its peak, 807,000 people watched it.  People compare that to Television viewing numbers and conclude, inaccurately, that more people are watching online videos (like exploding watermelons) than TV programs.  But what’s being reported is peak viewing – the maximum number of people watching any portion of the video.  Draper compares that to the CNN audience, which averages 712,000.  On the surface, it sounds like the BuzzFeed video had more viewers, right?  But let’s dig in.  Not everybody watched the whole watermelon video.  Measuring it the same way we measure TV – which is “average minute audience” as opposed to 3 seconds of viewing that Facebook uses – would show a much, much lower number. In Draper’s watermelon example, he took the total views of the watermelon explosion (10.7 million to date) and broke that down to an apples-to-apples comparison with the way we measure TV audiences.  He says the 10.7 million digital views would equate to… 28,563 average minute TV audience.  So instead of beating CNN, it actually delivered (in total) about 4% of what CNN delivers every minute. He cites two other examples:

Nielsen: The 2014 World Cup on ESPN received 115.5 million digital views.  That equaled just 7% of the TV audience.

FX: Applying the same digital video viewing metric to “OJ Simpson” on TV would have shown 143.9 million hours viewed and 259 BILLION VIEWS.

Rubber Bands vs Watermelon GONE WRONG | Will It SlowMo? | 700fps Slow Motion

Obvious inspiration came from The Slow Mo Guys, so go check them out, they made it look so easy! It was fun using that sledgehammer again though!

Thanks for leaving a “Like” on the video as this really helps me out and continues to grow our amazing community! Thank you 💙 ►SUBSCRIBE to my channel for more videos: http://bit.ly/WICSub

Watermelon explosion: Amazing Slow Mo Guys video in super slow motion

Subscribe to ITN News: http://goo.gl/zRYiYn The Slow Mo Guys’ latest viral video features incredible slow motion footage of an exploding watermelon. Daniel Gruchy and Gavin Free are called the The Slow Mo Guys and, over the years, they have become YouTube sensations. They used a large firecracker to explode the fruit as one of them…