#existential tension

Every individual has a psychological gravitation of which their emotional security is reactant for the stability and wholeness of their personality. This psychological gravitation stems from the concept of survival, whether it is between self or having to do with others/other things. Something must psychologically remain in order a person to feel secure. The foundation of psychological complexes revolve around emotional security and survival, down to the subconscious. The subconscious, or potentially a cognitive dissonance with the active conscious when it comes to psychological complexity, reforms the individual's sense of need and desire. What is desired is often not what is needed, vice versa. This is a danger of emotional complexity, in which there are many synaptic builds derived from outer influences that guide the individual to become reliant on a particular sense of fulfillment. However, emotional security can reach heights of complexity, this is where the vacuum of desire grows and existential tension is stressed. The momentum of high emotional complexity will drive an individual into a state of activity, this can be either rational or irrational. 

Could it be that the mental spirit of man has accelerated faster than his foundational sense of spiritual effort?

What is meant by this, is that throughout history, we (most of the first and second world) humans have evolved technologically and mentally to its current heights, but our common sense of effort in the human way of survival, from the foundational depths which created definition to evolve from in the first place, is deteriorating. 

A spiritual effort, such as building shelter with nothing but knowledge and materials in the wilds, would sedate the spirit for effort, the spirit, sedated for effort, would not as strongly experience the compulsion to progress unto the lessening of its own existential tension. And without this effort given, not this effort of surviving in a society and becoming victim to the potentiality of the psychological conditioning of immediate gratification, and that of many societal pleasures and comforts, but the mere state of being and existing in its own measures will not as easily conceive of a future of necessity. 

And especially for those rich man that influence the world, are they adapted to the spirit of mentality, or the spirit of being? 

The fundamental nature of desire of which an initiate of the truths of the Universe drives their self into occultism is heavily depended on their psychology. 

The act of seeking truth is not the question, but what drives one to seek truth? What is truth to them, conventional and unconventional? Is it to simply know? Is it a desire for knowledge, harmony, and peace amongst their self and all people? Is it to be closer to God? Is it their own pleasure? Is it a calling bird in desire for verification in the acts of one’s hidden or subconscious intents of malice? Is it a coping mechanism of existential tension? Is it a desire for integration, identification, or a title amongst the common folk? 

I question the underlying nature of occultism, in the very fact of its definition and potentiality of use amongst those who wish to be initiated in the ‘path of truth’. Might there be ‘poison in the cake’? After many revelations and epiphanies, one may find through this truth-seeking journey connotations of the release of dark psychology that may hinder the evolutionary implication of the human being by recessing to animal state, metaphorically, dualism. This part of our self is preferred in spiritual faith because we modern day humans are still bound to the duality of man; we have not evolved quite far to interpret this, only have we in realizations, knowledge, and technology be it physical or mental. We are on a cusp of evolution. It should not be forgotten that our human capability in wisdom is well-prepared to reflect on its own conscious in accordance with an objective reality considered amongst others, but certainly must be inquired. 

Will it be realized that many ‘easily fooled’ occultists are merely shedding light on the psychologically seductive natures of psychotic fallacy? Verifying and enacting to their own pleasure with principles of will? The children must eventually come back inside from play, and children will eventually grow into adulthood. This might not be the case for the easily fooled occultist, namely many of the younger generations inspired by the works of those such as Crowley and the like. The cake has icing, perhaps even ice cream, but again, it might be a poison of the nature of conscious. Even so, the state of psychosis is even praised for its chaotic archetype. What chaos is there is the constructed cosmos, but only what appears to be chaos? It is the illusion same as a coin moving fast enough to appear still. The conditioning and structure of the cosmos, as based on the One Expression, is so very complex it baffles us and trades the faith of learning its Expression into recreating the mystery of this so-called ‘chaos’ all over again, and then flailing this archetype onto ourselves, fundamentally reprogramming our state of mind. 

You must be careful between the notion of one whom tells you that all you know is an illusion, and the one whom tells you that we know very little.

Those who know and understand the Law of Duality we’ll understand that duality is relative, and this lens of ‘mere subjective relativity’ has been placed on our existence as if one created their world alone, without the help or honor of their ‘mother and father’. The saying of ‘the truth shall set you free’ and the notion of spirit having no ties to the physical realm inspires the foolish nature of a cognitively concluded state of cancellation in which one begins to deny some form of reality, shifting the weigh all to ego and will. Logicalities can even be built to overlay divine will, or the ‘will of the cosmos, the perfect DNA of the All’ into the strain of the peculiar. We are often told in new age spirituality that we are perfectly divine, that we are god or the creator. Is this not psychosis? Perhaps we are all a part of god, but can every one of us each be the perfect notion of what the All is? This can only be if we are next told we are peculiar; peculiar gods. But then this creates the underlying notion unto a psychological implication that we are above subjects for our physical capability.

The only ultimate concern of any philosopher that prioritizes technology and the advancement of the Universe as a unified whole (as far as the living species) is one that is ironically outside of its own philosophy. It is a philosophy that extends its destination within the path of where the destination does not even exist. But it must be an existential philosophy of animate beings that the unmanifested would be impacted by manifest, some tension between the realms of knowing and wonder, furthermore regulated by the tension of activity.

A.I. is a concern in our modern world because it seems that this is the answer to make things better; essentially it is deeply rooted in the deep affection that the human race has with creation itself, or the mystery of their origin.

Even if the ultimate goal were achieved and Universal singularity were achieved, or maybe at least that of the animate beings' work, the realm of manifestation will eventually collapse, much earlier, the end of that species. What is the matter, then? From our beginning to our end, what is truly the goal of existence other than what is guided through through the laws duration?

What is the guise of technological advancement? Is it something that we animate being desire for a decrease of existential tension or is it a catalyst for spiritual growth? It seems that All-Potential has already been created, so who are we to create further only for a means of existential tension? This represents lack of inner structure and homeostasis within the structure, thus creating the activity of animate beings.

It is not to say that stagnation is the answer to our problems, or that existence itself is. But it is to say that we do in fact exist and all that can be accomplished is neutral to whether is will, should, shouldn't or won't. This inquires that we must carefully decide our endeavors and articulate the focal points of which are existential tensions differ, as well as in how they amass into mutuality. What direction are we really going in furthering technology despite the excitement of artificial potentiality?

Knowledge itself is a force against the primordial creation, it disables potentiality and enables kineticism. In the law of rhythm it is depicted that there is this polarity of activity/passivity for the endurance of creation. But what is it then that it leaves out the philosophy of non-endurance, death and regeneration? To the animated, neutralization is meaningless, yet, philosophers of the same brand give exceeding gratitude to the element of stagnation, or neutralization, in the premise that it is a vertex of creation.

We must ask and interrogate ourselves; "Is the Universe we are created in truly inquiring the direction of complexity on a conscious level?"

The kinetic will respond, "Yes."

The philosopher will respond, "The meaning of creation is itself, and what the one of it makes it."

The passive or perhaps non-ambitious seem to be, in the minds of the kinetic, to merely perish at the standpoint of stagnation, and it is a terrible irony of the kinetic, a "sin" unto true source creation, or God.

Kineticism creates within the material realm, while passivity enables and furthers the dimensional trusion of potentiality, reenacting the source event. It binds itself with resonance and field, whereas activity merely moves through the binds. Furthermore, it would be said that this inner world of creation would better off first move and 'collect data' to enrich the inner world, however the activity of knowledge may become sin when one has become infatuated with it, creating it to be the ultimate philosophy, leading to the possible loss of even creating this inner world through vibrational conversion, if not regulated.

Our world is at ends of societal evolution. Our planet is big, and the history of the beings upon it is more vast than the planet's itself. We must interrogate the Godhead of our human philosophy. Are we able to truly interpret the non-philosophy of all-creation, or the direction of a being that merely presides within it?

To add onto this note:

It seems that our mundane society, the common folk and consumers, are obsessed with futurism and it is prevalent in cinema, gaming, media, television, etc. This obsession has been created by those who obsess in higher positions of wealth and power, for the populace to forge this reality for them, ultimately leaving us behind in a wide gap f capability and survival. This obsession of the mundane creates the direction, builds the railroad tracks to the new world that they and their lineage may not even see the extent of. Yet it is sacrificed in face of the sometimes spiritually overwhelming tension of survival and pleasure. The fact that bliss creates a radian of magnetism in the X-chromosome of our DNA does not incite that this is the true goal; All things have contradiction and are therefore incited balance. Our current human mind could not withstand the sense of pleasure that would override the circuitry of our clear thinking in the future generations. This means that existential tension must be long-suffered, and that the direction must be sacrificed. The linearism of conscious activity is not the necessity as of absolute direction, not one thing is.

The feelings one has for humanity, especially if it is nurturing and excited with its potential, must understand this in every philosophy that the Universe will go on until it is devoid, regardless of our existence in it. What goal then, would one have other than to make its existence what it wants? To share a goal with All-creation, and that is the direction of balance, homeostasis out of and in duration. This requires constant self-evaluation on all levels, which requires the stillness of meditation, further truly creating a something to be analyzed for the vector of movement by which the animate moves. Judgement comes last, and then a new beginning.

In analogy, the cells in our body do not function to evolve merely to transcend its own current veil, it is the body that decides this in its entire complexity; this is what will to the utmost is. If the cells do not communicate it creates cancer, or a virus of some sort within the structure. This analogy is in mutuality with the philosophy of what is desired to be accomplished by the kinetic, but it seems that the kinetic have deconstructed itself of its role.

We’re drinking on Earth, in the physical, because we’re drunk in the spirit. It is on Earth as it is in Heaven. As Above, So Below.