No, Sarah Silverman. YOU are being ridiculous.

The DNC NOT being impartial is already proof of corruption. Their OWN RULES state: "The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and even-handedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process." Found here: http://usa2016elections.com/stein-urges-sanders-withdraw-clinton-endorsement-leaked-dnc-emails/ And yet you, obviously NOT impartial writer Nicholas Loffredo, basically forgive them in this gem of a quote: "It shouldn't be shocking if top DNC officials thought a highly experienced former secretary of state, U.S. senator and first lady would be a better bet in November over a candidate who would have been caricatured by Republicans as a tax-loving liberal who wants to give everyone freebies." Arguing their side (and, in essence, Hillary Clinton's) by basically arguing their bias (which, once again, is AGAINST THEIR OWN RULES) can be forgiven because who WOULDN'T be partial to Hillary Clinton is an argument so baffling I'm at a loss for words. And while you do condemn the 'religious questioning' e-mail, going so far as to call it "gutter politics," it is after this that you basically forgive the DNC as shown in the above quote. To you sir, I suggest you actually check the Tweets you showcase in your article, specifically the Tweet by Jonathan Issacs. You either need mental help or writing classes, because I can't believe any sane person oe decent writer would believe they were fooling anyone. Even more hilarious is that considering this isn't the first e-mail scandal that Hillary Clintion has been involved in, if you think SANDERS is the 'caricature' for the Republican party than I definitely question where you get your sources, or if you even follow the Trump campagin at all. And FYI, for those looking for a lot of the OTHER nasty things from the DNC leaked e-mails that Mr. Loffredo failed to mention, I personally recommend this article: http://usuncut.com/politics/robert-reich-dnc-leak/ I think my favorite quote would be from Robert Reich himself, who is quoted: "I've known Hillary Clinton since she was 19 years old, and have nothing but respect for her. In my view, she's the most qualified candidate for president of the political system we now have. But Bernie Sanders is the most qualified candidate to create the political system we should have, because he's leading a political move for change." And a special message for you, Newsweek: With your obvious blunder, stemming from either your own corruption or a lack of viable choices for writers, I will be spreading my dislike of your branding FAR and WIDE. And by allowing a writer under your brand to slander Bernie supporters throughout this article, at one point calling their (as it turns out, FOUNDED) claims of corruption as "juvenile"? Is it just me, or, with more comments like this, is Newsweek headed for a slander lawsuit? Anyone?