#disappearence

Audio version of this post below

Uranus and mars were conjunct and both sextiling venus, which was representing jolissa (the asc) above in the chart where she was last seen on cctv.

If you have anything else to add or see something I don't please lmk.

HERE'S AN UPDATE!

One of my fav professional forensic astrologers who's found many missing persons before has just posted a video on Jolissa Fuentes showing us a map of where to look👇👇

Another thing to add that kristy the criminal astrologer mentioned is Venus is in cancer in the 12th right? Very close to the Sun and Asc, she said she might have been on her way home (Cancer) and had a car accident on the way there. Her car may be hidden (12th house) near her home in an open field.

Jolissa fuentes found!!!

UPDATE 10/10/2022: (click to zoom)

In the location right where it says trimmer is where she was found.. her car went off a cliff and into a area 250ft+ down.. between the mars and uranus line. The car was basically hidden underneath the trees and bushes... From that road there I can see how easy it is to get into an accident at that sharp turn.

She was found October 10th 2022 at around 1-6pm.

I looked up the chart of the day/exact time she was found and uranus was and is currently in retrograde at the EXACT degree that she had this accident (uranus wasn't in retrograde at that time)...isn't that crazy? I believe that this uranus retrograde is possibly what played a part in locating her bc it took us back to a time-even the investigator himself said these words "went back to the area that was one of the 1st places searched" so retrogrades have this way of bringing us back to the past so we can revisit, redo, gain new information from past events, it basically gives you a 2nd look or 2nd chance to make things right. Atleast that's my opinion anyway.

When reading a crime chart always pay attention to the aspects. What's aspecting the most important placements? Venus was very important here. The 2nd chart at 5:24am (top) shows the aftermath of the 1st one.. crazy.

At 1st look of jolissas chart before this case was swarmed with conspiracy theories, I was less confused. As you can see at the top before the updates, that was my initial interpretation of what could have happened. That's the thing about stuff like this or whatever the situation may be, always trust your 1st instinct. The most simple one bc when you allow other people's judgments to define your own you end up being very confused. For a while I had this post on private bc I was looking to other people for information since I couldn't confirm my own. They were saying she was in the open field by her house (bc there is many empty lots around) or possibly taken by someone, trafficked.. as more time passed it was like the crazier the theories got and I believed some of them. I didn't wanna say the wrong thing so that's why I privated. But now knowing what we know, I feel like more cases/investigators/searchers should try thinking outside of their own perception. Yes you may not be able to see off a cliff or imagine something happening but you just never know and you have to be bold enough to trust yourself when you have a strong gut feeling. Cut off all the noise, theories and stick to the facts + evidence only, that's the closest thing you can do to finding a missing person.

And focus on those who have experience too, Kristi the criminal astrologer helped me so much in this case. Very much an underrated astrologer

Aspects to note:

Saturn square mars, uranus and sun (transit). Saturn conjunct Jolissas sun, mars/uranus/sun square jolissas sun too.

Sun square mars and uranus (transit)

Venus inconjunct saturn and square pluto. (Transit)

To see the rest of my criminal astrology posts that get lost on my page, search and follow hashtag #forensicastrology 😊 <- (no spaces)

May you rest in peace, jolissa 💜 I heard great things about you, so sad you're gone..

An international publishing sensation, Stieg Larsson’s The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo combines murder mystery, family saga, love story, and financial intrigue into one satisfyingly complex and entertainingly atmospheric novel. Harriet Vanger, a scion of one of Sweden’s wealthiest families disappeared over forty years ago. All these years later, her aged uncle continues to seek the truth. He hires Mikael Blomkvist, a crusading journalist recently trapped by a libel conviction, to investigate. He is aided by the pierced and tattooed punk prodigy Lisbeth Salander. Together they tap into a vein of unfathomable iniquity and astonishing corruption.

Normally I’m not much of a mystery, police or thriller kind of girl because if I have to read mediocre books, I turn to romances. Those at least make me laugh and the characters are written to be likable when they can’t be interesting.  

 This is the book that changed my opinion about thrillers.

Our first main character, Mikael Blomkvist, an investigative journalist that recently fell into disgrace when up against one of the most powerful men in Sweden. He ruined not only his career but his personal life and had even to serve time in prison after losing his case in court.

Mikael is a nice enough character, a solid guy that cares about his daughter and has a nice enough relationship with her mother, is good at his job, has respectful even if inconsequential relationships with women with the exception of his co-worker with whom he has been in a relationship for years despite her marriage to another man.

After losing his case in court, Mikael knows that in order to save his magazine, Millennium, he has to step down and that is when he is offered a job by Henrik Vanger to solve the mystery of his niece’s disappearance under the guise of writing his biography. It’s while working on this mystery that he discovers that he had been hacked and then we are introduced to Lisbeth.

Lisbeth Salander is the true star of these books. If she didn’t exist the books would only be well written, with her the books are unforgettable. Lisbeth is an absolute badass: she is so smart that there are theories that focus only on if she suffers from Asperger or another kind of high functioning autism or if she is just smart and has no patience for the rest of the world.

Lisbeth Slander and Mikael as well, are even more interesting and amazing characters if you consider that the first book was published in 2005 and had a bisexual woman and a straight guy in a polyamorous relationship as the main characters. Other themes featured in this book are such as domestic violence, rape, alcoholism, murder and corruption.

The way this book is written is also pretty special because the book is organized into three different parts each one headed by a quote or piece of trivia that has to do with one of the themes in the book and each chapter has to do with a specific time frame of a few days or weeks.

Stied Larsson had the same job as Mikael in the book so you can be assured that he knows how to follow a thread and solve a mystery. When it comes to Lisbeth Slander, the hacking details are amazing to read and I loved to read the chapters that were focused on how her mind worked. This is one of the greatest books I ever read.

Just as a curiosity also, I read these books in Portuguese, and the title for the first book was: “The men who hate women”.

10/10

Rachel catches the same commuter train every morning. She knows it will wait at the same signal each time, overlooking a row of back gardens. She's even started to feel like she knows the people who live in one of the houses. 'Jess and Jason', she calls them. Their life - as she sees it - is perfect. If only Rachel could be that happy. And then she sees something shocking. It's only a minute until the train moves on, but it's enough. Now everything's changed. Now Rachel has a chance to become a part of the lives she's only watched from afar. Now they'll see; she's much more than just the girl on the train...

This book was a phenomenon in the Uk a couple years ago and I’m starting to think that if the Brits like something, it’s because it’s at least a little bit twisted.

This was another one of those books that I read after seeing the movie so by the time I finally got to the book the usual happened: I spent the first part being bored and annoyed at the characters and only really started to enjoy it after I was halfway through.

I'm a bit divided when it comes to this book. On one hand, I know I didn’t enjoy the story as I should have if I had read the book first. As it was I found the writing a bit boring. On the other, I think this is a story unlike any other because of Rachel.

Rachel is an extremely unreliable narrator and watching her peace her memories back together every morning was extremely interesting. Reading about her routine was what made me connect with the character, see the world through her eyes while waiting for the mystery to unfold. Every morning she woke up, looked at herself and tried to connect every bruise to a specific memory. Sometimes she remembered, sometimes she only remembered parts that could take her in a wrong direction or sometimes she just had to resign to never know. Those blackouts open the door to another of the book’s big themes: gaslighting.

When Rachel can’t remember something she has to rely on other people to tell her what she did the night before and for a long time that person was her husband.

I learned to like Rachel as she started to find her strength but I loved to read the descriptions of her when she was drunk: she fell, she threw up, she forgot to clean after herself, she started shaking when she was without a drink for more than a few hours,... the author kept nothing from us, didn’t try to make her a damsel in distress, just a lousy, disgusting drunk. How many female main characters like that have you encountered before? Same here.

Megan (or “Jess”), was interesting as well because unlike Rachel she didn’t wear her pain outside for everyone to see, she kept it hidden from everyone until it started eating at her.

My favorite character though was Anna, Rachel ex-husband's new wife. For those of you that saw the movie, you were introduced to a nice enough woman that is also a victim of Tom but can’t run away because they have a daughter. Book Anna is no victim. Yes, she married an awful man but she is not a good person either, not criminal, just not good and reading about her through Rachel’s eyes or even better, the chapters that were told through her pov were the best part of this book for me.

What set this story apart for me were the female characters: Rachel, Anna, and Megan were all flawed but that did not mean that they were beyond hope just that they were people. Good and/or bad but all deserving of justice.

6/10