Progress - Mindhive Crowdsourcing Platform
Iâve spent a good amount of time in this blog talking about how important culture is in creating an innovative public service. Itâs not an easy thing to achieve, and people arenât even entirely sure what the best approach is. Is it a top-down approach or grass roots initiative? Does it need hands on leadership or unit autonomy? External or internal coaching? Itâs a big challenge, we know this and readers of this blog will know that its something weâre trying to help solve here at MindHive. Iâm pleased to say there have been some positive shifts inside of government. Indications that these questions are slowly being resolved and that calls for celebration. Government culture has for a long time been transactional in the way that it sources input and information. Closed tenders represent a spokes and wheel approach where the central unit (government) extracts ideas and solutions from various sources, collates, costs and presents a solution. This has its obvious downsides in so far that the sources of information, the subject experts, are restricted to varying degrees from collaborating and assisting in the collation of this information. This puts enormous and unnecessary pressure on the central unit to deliver a policy that takes account of each individual interest and contingency. But we can alleviate this pressure and improve policy outcomes at the same time. By shifting to a model where the central unit no longer conceives of itself as the arbiter and final adjudicator to one where they openly acknowledge their ignorance of the solution, step back and work in a more facilitative role. This method allows stakeholders to interact more organically and earnestly in an attempt to develop one comprehensive policy or solution with government rather than seeing a number of them produced for government consideration. For this to work there needs to be a shift in the public serviceâs understanding of what its role as âpolicy makersâ is. A more willing acceptance of the fact that the answers arenât always going to be found by implementing good graduate programs and recruiting well from external organisations. This is the familiar critique of siloed government. Iâm pleased to say itâs not as forceful or accurate as it once was. Weâre seeing a number of initiatives and government departments starting to approach challenges in this more open and blunt manner. Coming to the table, acknowledging the enormity of a problem and asking for help. Not only does this attract more stakeholders and increase transparency, its builds good faith. Crowdsourcingâs great promise is that it will be able to make this an increasingly viable and sustainable approach to solving problems. It allows more people to be involved with greater transparency and for more challenges to be tackled simultaneously. In recent weeks at MindHive weâve seen the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science appeal directly to SMEs of any stripes to develop solutions to some of the big challenges. Theyâre encouraging more than just a dialogue, theyâre encouraging meaningful interaction with the challenge and the development of thoughtful solutions in collaboration with each other. This is a positive sign that the âinnovation revolutionâ is starting to gain traction and as these innovative approaches begin to breed innovative results weâll soon the benefits trickling down into frontline services in the form of new programs and initiatives. While many questions still remain about the best way government should approach innovation and how the public service can motivate and mobilise the behemoth that is its constituent parts, there is progress and where goes progress credit and commendation should follow.








