New four-square grid game just loaded up. I thought of a better name for it, which is "How Good You Doin'?", but I wrote it like that to impress one thing upon you:
Don't you dare fucking use my shit for evil. There is already potent evilness intrinsic to this game, and I swear by Gilligan myself that if you use this for evil, it's tasteless. You get no points doing anything which started from the seed of this evil, evil, EVIL game.
But some people need to get reality checked actually and factually, with fair and impartial Criteria. I have standardized a way for you to do it as scientifically and human-enough as possible. By using numbers like 4!
Each criteria (they're all different colors for clarity) needs to be scored out of 5. If you/target can't find a number for it, its 0 of course (don't think too hard just move on).
Some of them require special consideration; "Neuroses" is suppose to be judged like "how good is this person at [dealing with] their neuroses" and "choices" is suppose to be judged as "how good is this person at making good choices"
SOME criteria have TWO values to score individually, and as you can see they're pretty symmetrical so its probably correct enough to do it like that (and at very least very sexy.) For a total of 12 values and a max score of 60.
This type of game is very modular, you're allowed and even encouraged to change the criteria as one sees fit! To make a criteria grid, you take 4 intrinsic parts of some.. whatever. (I find it easy to take an established set of 3 and then try to make up one more complementary thing to add š #winning.) you take two boxes at a time, on every side and both directons diagonally, and think about the relationship of these 2 factors. This works so well because FOUR is just TWO TWOS. Twofold twofulness, and that's sacred and holy.
Yes the diagonals end up different based on orientation! What's YOUR orientation do to you??? Sorry, that was crossing a line. Diagonal pairs will often be very complimentary yet distinct. Idk, if you're not finding your shit very matchful, maybe it's not sexy enough to be used!
I've also included an example of how to grade your scores. Me and Aaron tried the game for ourselves and a couple people (like Kyle. Who sucked so much that he's our baseline bad person to not-be) and assigned values thusly. Aaron got a 42 and I got 53! If you get exactly 60, sorry, that makes you a god amongst mothafuckas, and that sucks.
You should definitely make your own score judgement scale if you want due to the personal nature of judging. No one likes doing it, except a hater, hater Supreme, and a hypocrite! Invoking the sacred right to be a hater is often called for, unfortunately. Or fortunately depending on how you feel about it.
I hope my shit can give people a guideline on how to be more fair and more human, and provide some prospective. Don't compare just 1 person to one person, that's lame. Compare TWO people to one person so that you can get a read for how the herd is doing versus one individual. who's really sick or really good! Your welcome.
