seen from United States
seen from Sri Lanka
seen from Yemen
seen from Croatia
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Maldives
seen from Türkiye
seen from China
seen from China
seen from France
seen from Brazil
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Netherlands
seen from Türkiye
seen from Jamaica
seen from China
seen from Italy
seen from Netherlands
I stopped ~dreaming~ advising.. & did it 4 myself.. ~idealist~ Now I’m on a mission to build the dream and empower the Team🙌🏾 Until we start living “the Dream”🥂 #PingklingOnline 🇿🇦🇺🇸 #constructivity #CurrentSolutions📖 (at Gauteng) https://www.instagram.com/p/BntKW5rhu2N/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=uqtgozo60zs
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
218 --- Constructivity
For my class, ‘Interactive Technology & Systems’, the class has been asked to define what the title of the paper is. This seems like a very strange way for a university paper to operate. Asking the class to define what is being learned within the class seems ridiculous. I don’t know what I don’t know. The lecturer criticised previous students who had simply looked up the term in Google and used the first result as the definition of Interactive Technology. I understand the criticism but this seems to imply that using the colloquial understanding of the term is not valid. This makes the assignment rather arbitrary.
I recently asked the Youtuber Anna Elizabeth (who is currently studying teaching) on her views on education. She spoke about two different pedagogies, behaviorist (direct instruction) and constructivist. The University course I am taking appears to me to be mostly constructivist and this is one of the reasons I love the degree I am taking. However, I am starting to understand some of the weaknesses of this type of education. As without a strong drive or curiosity of a given topic, constructivism will not be beneficial towards the student’s education. This is because, without any direct instruction, it comes down to a matter of chance of whether or not the student is on the same wavelength as the teacher. Even worse, when the teacher works on the assumption of a ‘behaviorist-style’ theory of knowledge, where all knowledge is only valid when referenced from an authoritative source, this seriously clashes with constructivist ideas of knowledge. I hold a firm belief in Constructivity, the idea of being able to tacitly build ideas from common knowledge and experience.
The Wall Street Journal is getting poetic and I don't like it.
