#consequences matter

im fine with wolf using any platform as a platform. in case you havent noticed, they have to ‘ignore’ the otherwise anti-woman/anti-gay statements/leanings of the religious group they have teamed up with as well. its not a matter of ‘it’s no wonder you are fine with teaming up with opponents -- you can afford to ignore something when you dont know what its like to experience it’. the women involved clearly are /at least/ knowing what its like to strategically put to the side the misogyny of their TEAMMATES let alone the platform. people already think radfems are xyz. they’re already doing everything to defame our positions, why is it now that we’re apparently thinking these same people will hear us in good faith anyway? collaboration across political leanings is literally what happens in your parliaments/houses of congress/houses of commons everyday.   if the only way to bring up title 9′s erosion is through collaboration, and if the only way to publicize this work is through a platform like fox, and if there is urgency to the plight in question, then this collaboration and platform use is necessary! if you watch the fox interview, the radfem speaker makes it clear that their politics diverge sharply from those of their collaborators. their position is laid out with some clarity -- that female is a meaningful category of people and this group of people deserves certain protections. this is also a way to expose moderately right-leaning people (including women) and centrists to feminist discourse that requires fewer ‘leaps of logic’ than third wave stuff. 

this book series has literally ruined every form of fiction that doesn’t appropirately deal with trauma caused by violence and death.