#american values

Enough!

If there was ever a red line in world history, we are here.

It really doesn't matter if you are liberal or conservative, or who you voted for in the last election-- there is no way you can be a good American, good Christian, or good person if you support a leader that makes statements like this.

If you try to dismiss this, try to explain it away as "good negotiating tactic", or try to justify it in any way, you are just a bad person. It's that simple. If you don't understand this, you just prove the point.

The American people are not the Mafia or the mob. We don't threaten to kill whole families or civilizations if we don't get our way, especially if "getting our way" means stealing from and killing other people that have not attacked us.

If our elected representatives can't understand this, don't have the moral courage to stand up and represent us the way they should, and reign in this megalomaniac, We The People will have no choice other than revolution.

That's the point our revered founding fathers got to and that is where we are now.

"…That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…"

Pregnancy contraceptives

Including:

1. Birth control pills

2. IUDs

3. Hormonal implants

4. Patches

5. diaphragms

6. Sponges

7. Injectables

8. Surgical sterilization for males and females

9. Morning After pills

10. Spermicide/gels

11. Vaginal rings

12. Condoms.

The Necropolitics of the American Right: A Death Cult - by HoodooBarbie

"I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new-age term, and it does a lot of damage." - Charlie Kirk

According to the brutal, self-fulfilling logic of the ideology he championed, Charlie Kirk would not have wanted anyone to feel empathy for him. On a stage in Utah, in the midst of a debate on the very gun violence that would moments later claim his life, the far-right commentator was the architect of his own philosophical prison. His murder, a grotesque act of violence witnessed by his family, is a profound tragedy. Yet, it is also the ultimate indictment of the modern conservative and Christian nationalist movement he represented—a movement that has shed the core tenets of its claimed faith to embrace a necropolitical worldview, a cult of death masquerading as a crusade for life.

Kirk’s dismissal of empathy is fundamentally at odds with the bedrock of the Christian doctrine he purported to defend. The Bible does not see empathy as a “made-up” modern concept but as an essential expression of God's character and a non-negotiable command for believers. It is the engine of compassion, the bridge to loving one's neighbor, and the glue of a unified community. The Apostle Paul commands it in Romans 12:15: "Rejoice with those who rejoice; weep with those who weep." The Apostle John weaponizes it against hollow faith, writing in 1 John 3:17-18, "If anyone has material possessions and sees a brother or sister in need but has no pity on them, how can the love of God be in that person? Dear children, let us not love with words or speech but with actions and in truth."

This was exemplified by Jesus himself. Matthew 9:36 states, "When he saw the crowds, he had compassion on them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd." His empathy was active, leading to healing and advocacy. This extends to a mandate for social justice, as in Proverbs 31:8-9: "Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy."

Kirk’s life’s work, however, was a systematic rejection of this biblical imperative. His platform became a safe space for hate, and his rhetoric consistently targeted the very people Scripture commanded him to defend. This reveals a chilling truth: for him and his movement, Christianity was not a faith to be lived but a tool to be weaponized.

· Un-Christian Attacks on CRT & Minorities: While preaching a gospel of "love," his movement demonized efforts to address America’s racial history (Critical Race Theory), directly contradicting the call to "defend the rights of the poor and needy" and seek justice.

· Un-Christian Attacks on the LGBTQ+ Community: Instead of weeping with those who weep or offering compassion, his rhetoric often dehumanizes a vulnerable community, the antithesis of the Good Samaritan’s active love for the "other."

· The Idolatry of the Gun: The movement’s core tenet is a fetishization of weapons that rejects any call for communal safety, placing an object above human life.

This active rejection of empathy is the hallmark of a death cult. It is anti-life. This ideology doesn’t seek to conserve or save; it seeks to dominate. Its end goal is not flourishing communities but a hierarchical oligarchy sustained by a diminished middle class, suppressed free speech, and the economic and social servitude of minorities, the poor or unworthy white, and non-conforming individuals. History is littered with its fruits: the atrocities of colonialism committed in the name of Christ, the violent oppression of the Jim Crow South defended by pious segregationists, and various modern injustices like denying healthcare to the vulnerable or separating migrant families at the border, all while waving the flag of faith.

Just moments before the trigger was pulled, Kirk was likely articulating the central dogma of this cult, a sentiment he and his allies have expressed countless times:

"GUN DEATHS ARE AN UNFORTUNATE BUT ACCEPTABLE COST OF PRESERVING SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO PROTECT OUR OTHER GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS. THAT IS A PRUDENT DEAL. IT IS RATIONAL." - also Charles Kirk

In a horrifying twist of fate, Charlie Kirk became the cost. He lived by the sword of violent rhetoric and an unflinching devotion to the instruments of death, and he died by it. In his own words, he rationally justified his own murder. This is the insidious psychological trap of the Conservative Christian Nationalist death cult: it convinces its adherents that the inevitable violence it cultivates is a noble, even holy, sacrifice.

Therefore, our response must be mindful. To guard our own souls from the spiritual death this ideology promotes, we must not mirror its lack of empathy with gleeful celebration. His death is a tragedy—not for the man he was, but for the situation it reveals. It is the tragic endpoint of a poisoned worldview. We can, and should, feel empathy for the human terror of the moment, for his family’s trauma, and for a nation so sickened by political violence that such events feel almost inevitable. This is not empathy for Kirk’s ideology, but empathy despite it—a crucial exercise in mindfulness to prevent our own empathy fatigue and moral descent.

Despite his unlikable and damaging qualities, Charlie Kirk was ultimately a victim. A victim of the very anti-life, unempathetic death cult he evangelized for. He truly believed its tenets were godly, but God, as defined by love, compassion, and empathy, was absent from his theology. His Christianity was the one corrupted centuries ago by hierarchical elites—like King James, who commissioned a Bible translation to legitimize his divorce—and modern grifters who twist scripture to serve power, not people. Kirk was a charismatic tool in this project, used to spread poisonous ideas that make people more fearful, more hateful, and more docile, easier to manipulate into supporting their own servitude.