cn
(source code)

seen from Netherlands
seen from Russia
seen from China
seen from Russia

seen from Canada

seen from Brazil
seen from Russia
seen from India

seen from Switzerland
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Switzerland
seen from India
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Switzerland
seen from Russia
seen from Russia
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
cn
(source code)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Here's a neat equation for an inverse function:
forall z contained in the circle C and functions "f" analytic over the closure of C
You do need to find the constant for the outer integral, but this should work.
The proof is pretty short, and is done using the Inverse function theorem.
Recommended preliminaries:
basic complex analysis is recomended
The most advanced thing that is really used is Cauchy's integral formula.
Idea: Complex Analysis Yaoi
3Blue1Brown explains how (and why) to take the logarithm of M. C. Escher's lithograph Print Gallery [Interactive sandbox here]
Region I’m integrating the boundary of is the crust of a pizza. Function gives sauce plus cheese. Poles of function are toppings. Residues are how much I enjoy a given topping. So the residue theorem just says that how much I like the pizza (ie. The value of the integral) is equal to 2pi i times how much i like all the toppings.
Argument principle? Just saying that (for me at least cause I hate pineapple and love pepperoni ) the pizza from f’/f has one pineapple at each topping (pole) of f and one pepperoni at each zero of f.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
doing complex analysis and the lecturer is using n(γ, a) for the winding number of the point a in relation to the curve γ which is fine
but i keep reading n(γ, a) as nya~ and now it's just silly to me