PRETENTIOUS TURQUOISES AND NARANJA BUTANOS
NOTE: I don't know why, the enter key/space bar spaces do not really work on tumblr? Ironically enough, the text will be distributed in a weird way, apologies.
Orange is -metaphorically speaking- dangerous to use on your paintings, on anything. You have to know how to use it.
"Mum aren't there too many oranges in this pic?"
You can clearly see a sense of untidiness, of disaster, and the girl being annoyed and uncomfortable, beautifully framed not just by orange, but by white.
So-- let's talk about The Mummy (2017). Terrible movie, and at the same time, similar to some of MARVEL's so-so movies, were you see "this could work" but is cancelled by other ideas. Butano-like ideas.
"Oof, Mr. Art director. There's too much blue in this background, not enough orange. Let me fix that for you".
Now you might think, "But this image has the same crowded oranges as the painting of the little girl above! The subject is untidy, chaos, same concept???"
what was exactly the POINT of these lamps?
This sequence from The Mummy is the "reveal" from Dr. Jekyll to Mr. Hyde. He's the monster now. Spooky eyes and all whatnots.
This is a NEW character.
You might say, well, he's hiding between the lights.
But this is not Mr. Hyde. This is Mr. Dystractful.
Can you SEE his eyes? Can you see his FACE? This is a moment which goes so fast and does not frame anything, aka no point. The only thing the lights do is being distracting, not chaotic.
Heck- I tried to fix it- took me 5 minutes? With a mouse because my XP-Pen is lagging?
Listen to Unka Ridley Scott, The Mummy.
Crowe's nicely framed. Chaotic lights. No face. But we as the audience know who he is.
"STOP WITH THE FUCKING GARFIELD ORANGEEEEES"
OT: For some reason people insist on using large mouths on horror movies? It's not scary. IT. IS. NOT. You know what it reminds me of?
Unless you're ironically funny.
"Give Sweet Freddy K. a kiiiiiissssss"
Good fire framing.
SEE THE POPE'S EXORCIST?
AND you can instantly recognize who he is.
Anyway, let's leave The Mummy on one side-
Crowe's good movies. Like Cinderella Man.
"Yes sir, I like this orange. Compositionally not bothering me. Can I have a drink of that whisky over there which is harmonically balancing the lamp? "
Also, for a movie which does not really belong to the "dark" genre, this framing has an excellent use of black which any baity horror movie wish it had.
The Nice Guys- a 70's themed movie. Impossible not to use butanos. But they're used WELL here.
Orange framing and orange MOOD for comedy.
Angular and basic composing? Maybe. But it still works.
Bah, I like Austin Powers. Palette's terrible in this promo, but Goldmember is stupid fun. I guess it's only the 70's movies where you can allow yourself to go crazy fun with colour?
Yep. Art director knew EXACTLY what he was doing.
"It's not the colour, mate. It's how you use it"
Nice poster, but Gosling's arm tangent here is KILLING me, haha.
Find positivity, and you'll find negativity easier- does that mean you have to avoid negative spaces?
Just avoid (+ learn from) people who don't know how to handle negative spaces. How to balance them.
How to kill a concept with terrible colour framing.
The movie does not look like this, but the person who edited the gif is a psychopath. Where are Lilo and Nani, exactly?
"We're fine, our skins are slowly being eaten by hell"
Anyway, as long it does not happen on Disney movies themselves--
"Ooooooh so you wanted me to show my full potential through an underused classic literary character? Well, too bad! Now I have the potential of a car AD!"
(Actually I like this frame. Absence of f oranges, no poor CGI, just Crowe being natural.
And throwing in his WTF eyes
Did they throw red on his eyes for a moment? Subtlety? REALLY?
THE MUMMY IS TRYING TO REDEEM ITSELF.
But even if you have a good actress as the villain and Crowe as the antagonist- it will self-explode.
(to be continued in part III)