#clock_speed

Will take place on December 14 Intel has already announced that it will introduce Meteor Lake processors on December 14, but only now has it announced the corresponding event.  [caption id="attachment_78904" align="aligncenter" width="780"] Core i. Intel[/caption] On this day, Core Ultra will replace Core i. Intel announced the AI ​​Everywhere event It's called AI Everywhere, and the name clearly tells us that Intel will place a lot of emphasis on AI when announcing new CPUs. Let us remind you that Meteor Lake will be the first Intel consumer processors with a hardware unit to accelerate AI. Some mobile Ryzen 7040 APUs already have a similar solution, but so far for most users this is a meaningless part of the CPU. However, according to multiple leaks, a big emphasis on AI will be placed in Windows 12, so perhaps then all these processors will reveal a new side.  At the agreed event, Intel will also present Xeon Scalable processors of the Emerald Rapids generation.  

In single-threaded mode, the Core i9-14900KF beat everyone The Core i9-14900KF processor appeared in the PassMark benchmark database and immediately became the leader in the single-threaded performance rating. [caption id="attachment_58562" align="aligncenter" width="780"] Intel CPU[/caption] Despite the fact that technically the Core i9-14900K/KF is a complete copy of the Core i9-13900KS, apparently, there are some settings related to power limits. As a result, the new model is still a little faster than its predecessor, although this is unlikely to be noticeable in practice. The results of the new Intel CPU have appeared in PassMark But in multi-threaded mode, which is much more important from a practical point of view, everything is more interesting: the new product differs vanishingly little in performance from the Core i9-13900K and is even inferior to the Core i9-13900KS. And all of them are noticeably behind the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

Although it's unclear why The Core i5-14600K processor appeared in the latest Cinebench 2024 benchmark. The result is unexpectedly noticeably higher than that of the Core i5-13600K, although these processors are almost completely identical. [caption id="attachment_56242" align="aligncenter" width="780"] Core i5-13600K[/caption] The new product scores 124 and 1430 points in single-threaded and multi-threaded modes, respectively. This is respectively 8% and 14% higher than the previous model. For comparison: in Cinebench R23 there is a 3% increase only in multi-threaded mode. The Core i5-14600K significantly outperforms the Core i5-13600K in the new test [caption id="attachment_56243" align="aligncenter" width="780"] Core i5-13600K[/caption] Let us remind you that technically we are talking about the same CPU, only the new product has a frequency of 200 MHz higher. It is still unclear where the difference of 14% comes from, especially given the lack of difference in the other version of the benchmark. However, this gives hope that in several other applications, Raptor Lake Refresh processors will look better compared to their predecessors. Let us remind you that the older new items in the line will be presented on October 17.

Announcement of new items is expected in October The Core i9-14900K processor appeared in Geekbench, and now this result can be compared with the Core i9-13900K and other CPUs. [caption id="attachment_52345" align="aligncenter" width="780"] Core i9-14900K[/caption] The novelty scores 3120-3140 points in single-threaded mode and about 19,100 points in multi-threaded. In the first case, this is about 6% more than its predecessor, and even a little more than the Core i9-13900KS, and in the second, even less than the Core i9-13900K, but this may well be since the testing conditions are not are identical. In a fresh test, the Core i9-14900K managed to lose to the Core i9-13900K in multi-threaded mode [caption id="attachment_52346" align="aligncenter" width="780"] Core i9-14900K[/caption] In general, technically, the Core i9-14900K should be a complete copy of the Core i9-13900KS with a frequency of 6 GHz out of the box. The configuration of the cores is the same here, the architectures are the same, so the results should be as close as possible. Let us remember that in CPU-Z the new CPU managed to outperform its predecessor by 8–10%.