ICF and occupational therapy
This was this week's learning objective.
It did not sound like anything occupational therapy-ish and definitely had me underestimating its impact on my learning. THERE WAS SO MUCH TO LEARN ABOUT THE ICF><
Nonetheless, I'm really liking the learning that we're going through at my school - getting us to think about learning objectives, and then coming back together to share our findings. The generation of new questions or doubts would undoubtedly emerge and this type of learning is much more engaging as compared with the traditional mode of teaching.
The ICF seems to be moving in the direction of becoming practice based, with its recent development of assessment tools, core sets and also documentation tool. What is the WHO's real objective on developing these tools - really?
None can deny that the activities and participation factor/qualifiers is not comprehensive enough to encompass the subjective components to participation, and the person's ability to make decisions about which occupations to engage in. This is the direction that we should be advancing towards - to delivering occupation-based intervention and treatments. And ultimately leading to clients being satisfied with therapy outcomes and resulting in eudaimonic well-being. Really hoping for occupational therapists to have a larger say in the next revision of the ICF.
Lets go, lets make a difference!
signing off,
the typical occupational therapy student