Itās my understanding that the reason why itās antisemitic to unilaterally call out infant circumcision is similar to the reasons why African feminist activists have noted the imperialist lens through which the West tends to understand female circumcision/āfemale genital mutilation.ā
SayingĀ āthe outgroup is being inappropriate about how theyāre assessing this issueā isnāt the same as supporting the issue.
I donāt know much about how various modern Jewish communities feel about the issue of body autonomy as it has been raised with regard to infant circumcision, but Iāve read very nuanced critiques by African feminist anthropologists who have basically saidĀ ālook, we donāt like non-consensual female circumcision either, but the West refuses to even acknowledge any potential cultural context that it has and overwhelmingly acts off of white saviorism toĀ āspeak outā about thisĀ āissueā as if actual Africans havenāt actually been speaking out on their own already... and the explosion of this regional issue into a global one has created an unchallenged platform for pointing to this practice as evidence of AfricanĀ ābrutalismā andĀ āprimitivism.āā
And sinceĀ āyou canāt just useĀ āitās antisemitic to be against circumcisionā as an argumentā discourse is gaining traction (again), I feel like it might be worth throwing in my own unnecessary and irrelevant two cents thatĀ āyour analysis of this situation is biased and founded in the ideals and virtues of your own monolithic culture, and the fact of the matter is that regardless of whether or not we come to an agreement about the act and its nature (which we might!), a conclusion ofĀ āthis is badā which comes from outsideĀ of the culture in question must be challenged in a way that a conclusion ofĀ āthis is badā which is appropriately informed and sensitive of the culture doesnāt need to beā is a perfectly reasonable take.
Like. I value bodily autonomy just as much as the number of activists speaking out against circumcision right now, but itās also ridiculouslyĀ shitty to turn to imperialist values as definitive proof of why something is universally bad (after all, these same people would probably eagerly argue why itās necessary to put head-shaping helmets on flat-headed babies despite the fact that babies cannot consent, because itās For Their Own Good as determined by Western science and its values that conflateĀ āconforming to a normative understanding of The Bodyā andĀ āhealthā).
You can, in fact sayĀ āculture isĀ relevant to this discussionā while also arguing that The Cultural Thing Is Bad.Ā āCulture is irrelevantā is a bad take.
(Iām pretty self-conscious about this take, though, because despite the fact that I think thereās more nuance to be had in this discourse discussion, I am also quintessentially Very Far From This Issue and am not necessarily confident that my view represents anybodyās best interests.)