#ce fandom

I really don’t want to come off harsh, but some of the ideas around manifestation—especially when it comes to manifesting a celebrity crush—are getting a bit out of hand. There needs to be a serious reality check here!

First of all, the person you're trying to manifest has no idea who you are. Manifestation isn’t a magic spell to override someone’s free will. It’s about alignment, timing, and mutual resonance. If something—or someone—is meant for you, it will naturally be drawn to you through shared frequency and divine timing. You can do all the techniques, affirmations, and subliminals in the world, but if it’s not meant for you, it simply won't happen.

Especially when it comes to people, manifestation must respect free will. You CANNOT bend someone's will or force them into your life just because you want it badly enough. That includes celebrities. If there's no soul connection or divine alignment, you're essentially chasing a fantasy.

This is why so many of you end up feeling drained, disillusioned, and stuck—because you’re exhausting yourselves trying to claim something that was never yours to begin with. Then you spiral when you see that person or desire align with someone else who was always meant for them/it.

At some point, we have to ask ourselves: are we using manifestation as a tool for empowerment and alignment, or as a form of escapism? Imagine how many amazing, authentic experiences and relationships you're missing out on while being laser-focused on manifesting someone who might not even be part of your path.

It’s time to take a step back and re-evaluate how we're approaching manifestation and what the New Age / Law of Assumption / Attraction space is really promoting. True manifestation is about co-creation with the universe, not control or obsession. Let’s not lose ourselves chasing what isn’t aligned when what is meant for us is waiting to meet us halfway.

Be blessed.🙏

And its made me think...

I wonder how many other people had the same experience of entering this fucked up fandom as I did?

For me, what really solidified it was definitely this:

I fucking miss that guy.

It took me such a long time to let go of the thought that he actually wasn't that guy.

It took me even longer to realize that he was never that guy, but that that guy was a PR made personality. It was never him.

It was all just created and manufactured for mass consumption.

I'm still dealing with accepting that.

Because deep down, in my deepest most darkest depths, I want to root for him.

I want to root for him so bad.

I was content, rooting for him forever.

But I can't anymore.

He ruined it.

He fucking ruined it.

Because no matter how much I wish him the best, I can't wish him this. I have tried to put my personal opinions aside, I have tried to look at this whole thing objectively.

But no matter how I look at it, it's just wrong. It's gross, it's racist, it's disappointing.

No part of me can support it.

So I cling to the person he used to be. At least until I'm ready to let go.

And while I do it, I lie to myself.

I tell myself he was truly this person, once.

And no.

I am not a fan of Alba. I don’t know anything about her, besides the fact that Chris seems very happy and in love. I don’t feel one way or another towards her, because I’ve never heard of her and I’m not about to spend all my time googling her. So don’t jump in my messages with some bullshit, cause I am not the one.

THEIR personal lives are just that: THEIR personal lives. Why you’re all being mean and nasty to each other, over people who DON’T EVEN KNOW YOU, is just wild to me. Grow the fuck up. Jesus. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again:

FOCUS ON YOUR OWN FUCKING LIFE!

Newsflash, people will do anything for money and image - including faking an entire baby!

The machinery is the same: PR teams, strategic leaks, curated "authenticity"—all to make money and control the narrative.

If you can be skeptical about one, you should at least question the other. It's time to grow up and see the world for what it really is!

This reading was inspired by a perspective shared by someone who was clearly well-versed in PR strategies and the smoke and mirrors of Hollywood. Sadly, this insightful individual had to deactivate their blog due to bullying and attempts to silence their voice.

I hope they’re doing okay and know how deeply their words resonated with so many. Their perspective stuck with me, and recently, I felt called back to it, reflecting on the truth they laid bare.

It moved me enough to do a reading on the situation, and unsurprisingly, the cards echoed everything they had originally pointed out. Their insights remain powerful and relevant, shining a light on how calculated deception often comes at the expense of authenticity.

This reading offers a deeper dive into those dynamics, confirming the patterns of manipulation, control, and fear that continue to drive this narrative. The truth always has a way of rising to the surface, and it’s only a matter of time before the reckoning arrives!

So, let’s talk about the recent Interview Magazine piece—the one that's supposed to spotlight Chris Evans’ and his "friend's" career but somehow manages to spiral into half-baked gossip, suspicious phrasing, and a level of weirdness that can’t be ignored. Here’s a breakdown of why the whole thing feels off, and what it might really be signaling behind the scenes.

🚩 1. The “PR Wife” Mention: Strategic or Sloppy?

The reference to "the wife" was jarring. In an interview focused on Bryan and Chris’ work, suddenly dropping in a vague, nameless mention of a spouse feels shoehorned at best, and desperate at worst. If you’ve followed the fandom discourse, you already know:

It’s not neutral language. Calling her “the wife” instead of using her actual name after three years of headline-making PR pushes? That’s intentional.

It’s not forgetfulness—it’s soft distancing and plausible deniability. You don’t leave out a name the media spent years trying to sell unless you’re actively trying to shift the narrative.

It’s not love, it’s optics. If this was a genuine, beloved partnership, using her name would boost SEO, fan engagement, and lend credibility. But instead? Ghosted. 👻

This reads like someone checked a box: “Mention her—technically.” Done. No warmth. No context. Just a disjointed drop that screams: This isn’t working and we don’t want to admit it.

🙄2. Tone Mismatch & Interview Weirdness:

The interview feels/reads weird. Disconnected. At times, borderline AI-generated or edited. The tonal shifts are wild—from thoughtful reflections on his projects, HW perspective, to chaotic blurts about tanning, fanboying, and... not knowing his bestie’s house burned down?

Buried in the middle of the interview is one seemingly throwaway line, but fans immediately picked up on the weird energy:

📝 Quick Correction & Context Add: So I mentioned earlier that Chris said something about “she should start writing”—and I want to clarify, that was my mistake. What he actually said was:

“I was just telling my wife this the other day…” Then he launches into a whole reflection about how the industry is a draining cycle of hope, regret, burnout, and ego spirals.

But honestly? The vibe still clocks weird. Like… what kind of pep talk is that for someone starting out or trying to break into the industry? It’s not a “we talk about this together” tone—it’s more “here’s the loop I’m stuck in and why this all kind of sucks, but hey, you do you.” It comes off like a burnt-out dad giving his daughter tired advice he no longer believes in himself. 😬

It’s that same flat energy we’ve been noticing: the name-drop with no warmth, no real connection. Just a checkbox mention and then boom back to his existential spiral. And even if he is over it and mentally checked out of the industry, it’s still jarring to see someone speak about their own career this way—while using their partner as the setup line. It doesn’t feel collaborative or mutually inspiring—it feels like a guy going through the motions and letting her know, “eh, you’ll see for yourself.”

So while I fully retract the “writing” quote (thanks to the anon who helped catch that), I stand by the overall tone being a red flag. Still weird. Still distant. Still part of the bigger puzzle.

It's subtle, but shady. It reads less like a supportive husband and more like someone giving a vague career suggestion to an acquaintance. Not “We’ve been talking about her writing,” but “I told my wife she should.” Casual dismissal? PR jab? Either way, it lacked warmth or intent.

It’s a loaded line—and here’s why it feels so off:

Passive Tone: Not “Alba and I talked about her career growth” or “she’s interested in writing,” but he told her she should. It doesn’t read like a supportive husband. It reads like a Hollywood dad suggesting his kid “just keep doing it, cause I did” because nothing else is sticking. (But… how could that possibly be true? She’s an “international star,” flying between NYC and LA like it’s nothing. She’s SAG certified, speaks a million languages as a humanitarian, and paints adorable dog trays to cope with being kidnapped and having a fling with racists who kidnapped her! Not to mention her flawless eyebrows—thanks to years of yoga and fighting against racism and Nazism, all while being Chris Evans’ "perfect spouse." Everything’s totally genuine, not at all like some carefully orchestrated PR contract with a whole lot of greased palms behind the scenes like the mean ole jealous fans say. What do they know? Oh, The horrors! How could nothing else be working otherwise? 😱)

Comparative Jab: Framing it as “that’s how I got started” lowkey implies she hasn’t done enough or doesn’t have what it takes unless she copies someone else’s route. That comparison wasn’t needed—and it’s not flattering.

Dismissive Energy: If this is someone you respect and love, why reduce her potential creative work to something she “should try even though you've clearly had enough and want out”—like it’s a hobby, or stay and be miserable like me until you're ready to move on? The energy is off. No affection, no personalization, no shared anecdotes. Just a flat, formal distance that makes it feel like a contractual mention rather than a genuine part of his life.

It doesn’t feel like a genuine endorsement. It feels like, “Welp, nothing else is working… but this is how it goes - so stay and be miserable” 🥴 We all saw it for what it was: casual shade wrapped in a PR-friendly sentence.

And let’s be real—it tracks. The avoidance of her name, the lack of public praise, the absence of shared moments or mutual respect? It all adds up. Everything about this mention was flat, awkward, and performative. That line was just another glitch in the matrix.

📰 3. Media Strategy: Drama Over Depth:

Why even include this in a career-focused interview?

Clickbait: Relationship rumors = traffic. Even respected outlets bend the knee to algorithms.

Low-effort journalism: Instead of diving deeper into his creative process or evolution, they tossed in gossip to stir up buzz.

Disrespectful to the subject: It undercuts Chris’ artistry by reducing the conversation to tabloid fodder.

💥 4. What This Signals About the PR Narrative!!

The energy is giving frantic cleanup with a side of sabotage. 😭📝

The PR wife brand is fading. This interview feels like a last-ditch effort to fulfill a mention quota—without fully re-committing to the narrative.

The “Single Working Man™️” rebrand was working. Fans were embracing the shift. Lowkey press, dog dad content, solo-focused energy. This clunky mention derailed that momentum.

It’s possibly a contractual mention. Some theories point to obligations—either she/ her team two friends pushed for a final nod because they're desperate as usual and to save face from Borderline flop, or it was required. If so, Chris fulfilled it as minimally as possible.

The passive delivery, the lack of praise, the awkward vibe? It all supports the idea that he’s phasing this out, not building it up as they've done before.

🔮 Final Thoughts: Rebrand in progress as we've discussed, but the chaos Still Lurking!

This interview was supposed to build hype for both of their projects. Instead, it reignited fandom fatigue, spotlighted awkward PR dynamics, and raised more questions than answers.

The "PR wife" reference reeks of lazy, click-driven editing—a cheap tactic to stir buzz at the expense of the interview’s integrity. The inclusion reflects poorly on the publication. It’s a reminder that even "serious" outlets often prioritize drama over substance.

You all - the brilliant minded fanbase has clocked the pattern. (And they would have gotten away with it too if it weren't for you ole meddling fans!) No name = distancing. Weird phrasing = forced compliance. The “just do what I do and hush” moment = accidental shade.

So where do we go from here?🤔🫣

Expect a redirect. More fan-forward content. Quiet distancing. Maybe even a course-correcting piece that erases this interview’s chaotic residue.

Watch for the next PR twist. If we’re lucky, this was the last desperate drop. But if Ms. PR Brat™ pulls a stunt at a Materialists premiere? Buckle up.

Hopefully by SDCC 2025 (I still think he may make an appearance) if not by Materialists, this will be old news—unless Ms. I deserve to be famous for being married™ pulls a really desperate stunt (e.g., showing up to Materialists premieres). Chris’ team is clearly done engaging, and the fandom’s fatigue is palpable.

🌅 The sun may be setting on this mess—but in Hollywood, there’s always a final twist.

Until then, stay meddling and Keep your Scooby snacks ready!🤭🩵

It’s wild how you’ll say one thing in private and then act completely differently in public. It’s one thing to disagree with someone, but it’s something else entirely to vent in DMs or Anons, then turn around and laugh along with the very people you were just criticizing. That’s not neutrality—it’s disingenuous.

You are being cowardly. If you hate someone or their blog so much, why are you checking their posts daily, laughing with them, then running to me (or others) to complain? It’s absurd!

This space has become even more toxic because people won’t stand by their words and instead expect others to speak up while they play both sides. If you’ve got something to say, say it and move on. But don’t bring your one-sided beef or dramatic sob stories to me—I see through it all.

I’m always going to speak honestly and share my thoughts—especially when things cross into delusion or obsession. I have no issue calling it out. But I’m not here to be anyone’s spokesperson or shield, especially not for people whose actions don’t match their words.

And if you feel called out by any of this? Sit with that discomfort. Don’t deflect or expect someone else to defend you. A lot of you don’t want to hear how ridiculous, delusional, or mean-spirited you’ve become. You want to gossip and obsess over a celebrity who doesn’t know you, then perform outrage when someone calls it out? Be serious.

You clutch your pearls in public, but you live in the gossip trenches—obsessing over someone who doesn’t know you exist. You're online nonstop: writing endless fanfics, stalking flights, his movements, comparing carpet swatches and trees, socially media interactions, stats, further obsessing over which of his ears turns you on, and tying your self-worth to his every move. If your lives were actually full and fulfilling, you wouldn’t be doing this 24/7. You’d log on, share a little tea, and log off.

But instead, you’ve made this your identity and trust me, it’s going to cost you. Not Chris Evans. Not any other celeb you’re stanning. You. You’re the one who will wake up one day and realize you wasted your time chasing something hollow.

Last of all, again, some of you really need to BFFR! A lot of you aren’t mad about the PR mess because you care about his career or staying to see how it ends—you’re bitter because it got in the way of your fantasy.

You’re waiting for it to end, not because you want better for him, but so you can get back to pretending he’s “yours,” thirsting and degrading him without guilt, and sliding back into that “future spouse” delusion.

Newsflash: you weren’t his future spouse before this PR, and you won’t be after it ends. Get a grip.

You are missing out on the best parts of yourself—your peace, your time, your potential—by chaining yourself to a fandom, a fantasy, and a fixation over a stupid PR stunt that every celeb must pay their due and do in Hollywood. This goes beyond parasocial. It’s unhealthy and you're doing TOO much. You need to step back and seriously reflect on where your head is at. Life is too short. Here today, gone tomorrow. Focus on you. Get your life together. We’re nearly halfway through the year, and if you keep going down this road, the “tower moment” you’re waiting to see happen to him will be the very one that humbles and crushes you instead. Face yourself.

I’ll be back soon to start answering messages and sharing some of the incredible pieces I received for the fandom features—I'm genuinely excited to highlight them! Thank you to everyone who sent a submission to @fandomfeaturesxsoultruths.

Thank you to all of you who have sent your love and well wishes to me during this time. I appreciate it, more than anything. Thank you from the bottom of my heart!🤍🙏

In the meantime, take care of yourselves. Truly. Start loving and investing in yourself the way you’ve been doing with this man and these other celebs.

You deserve more than obsession—you deserve a full, grounded life.

Stop degrading yourself and losing your self-esteem online over someone who does not know of your existence!

Stan respectfully and responsibly!

I believe in you!